SuperStiltzkin
Member
I can't remember, did we ever get Sansa's reaction to losing Rickon?
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
Game of Thrones *NO BOOK DISCUSSION* |OT| Season 7 - [Read the OP]
- Thread starter Cornballer
- Start date
- Status
Nope, she just wanted to know where Jon was keeping Ramsay.
She'd already accepted Rickon as a lost casualty prior to the battle. It was all about getting Winterfell back, for her.
The Artisan
Member
she was right, though. She knew him well enough to know Ramsay would never give him back alive and even explained her logic to Jon.
Did anyone, at all?
The Artisan
Member
The Meera Reed/Tyrion Targaryen theories, my answer to both is that if they do more twists like that, then the twist beforehand with Jon loses its value in the story. I'd rather they not do any more secret Targaryens
SuperStiltzkin
Member
Oh right, I forgot about that argument. But I thought we'd get a funeral or something for him. Even if he was a minor forgotten character, he was still a Stark.
The Artisan
Member
arrow through the heart must be a really painful way to go 
DarkJediKnight
Member
Yep. And Jon got half his men killed because he charged instead of letting Ramsey charge the middle. All that trench digging for the cavalry was for nothing.
arrow through the heart must be a really painful way to go
On the plus side, you get to give love a bad name.
The Artisan
Member
i see now, you're to blame.
He's being Little-Richard rather than Littlefinger.
It sucks that I had a momentary lapse of thought last Wednesday, when I booked Dunkirk tickets for tonight
The speculation was that they would both be in the tower, not that we would find out about it later down the line.
The Artisan
Member
but we would find out about it later down the line since right now the revelation is that Jon is the secret Targaryen. And I know the speculation is them both in the tower hence twins
What? The episode would've told us they were both targaryens, why would we have found out later?
The Artisan
Member
i thought that was the point of the theory in that it would be revealed later on. unless you are arguing against it?
No, we would've found out at the same time we found out about Jon, it would be a reveal for both characters. Since we know that didn't play out, Meera being Jons sister is no longer a theory that works.
It would be weird if the theory rested on us finding out the second twist a season later or something.
DangerMouse
Member
That ep description on my cable, heh.
LOL
LOL of course Jon faces a revolt. Those people can't help themselves lol.
"Tyrion plans the conquest of Westeros." Fucking love it.
LOL
Can't load it on 360 nor in Edge (HBO GO user here)
EDIT: Now is working on Edge.
Let's hope this shit doesn't craps like last week.
The Artisan
Member
i've been seeing discussion for that theory even after last season's finale.
i just got a message that PsN is undergoing maintenance, but that could also be unrelated
How? Only Jon was up there, that theory died the second we saw Jon wasn't a twin.
The Artisan
Member
"how" is just youtube videos and articles being published.
Then they were published before the final came out, because that theory makes no sense once we know Jon isn't a twin. Were they hiding Meera under the bed for shits and giggles or something?
The Artisan
Member
No they weren't. Like I just told you, I've seen them come into convo long after the season finale.
https://youtu.be/2xvgcSPhayA?t=5m16s
That guy just said the theory that was disproved by watching the episode, the exact theory I talked about before, the same one that no longer works.
[edit]
The theory was that Ned goes up, he finds twins, and then via either editing or dialogue, we are told that Jon and Meera are brother and sister. The theory didn't have anything to do with a delay reveal with Meera.
Which is what that guy said but that it's like he didn't even see the episode.
The Artisan
Member
my point to you was that the theory has been in discussion long after last season, nothing more.
neurosisxeno
Member
I swear the PS4 OS hates HBO Now. It's probably my second most used Streaming App, and for some reason doesn't ever appear in the Top 9, and for some reason doesn't show up at all occasionally...
Your original point was this
the implication being that if the theory was correct, it would diminish the already established twist with Jon at the end of this season 6. But there's nothing to diminish, because this theory rests on us finding out two babies at the top of the tower, which would've told us as the same time they Meera and Jon were related, so it wouldn't have lessen the value and it wouldn't have been yet another secret Targaryen twist.
So my point is that this theory isn't a theory that is still in play since it has been disproven, so it's impossible for it to devalue Jon's twist. That's why I brought it up in past tense.
My power went out last season literally when the camera was zooming into Cersei's face for her to say, "I choose violence". She ended up choosing a power out.
darkwing-buck
Member
hacksaw ridge is so good
I dont condone violence but in that case, I would have understood.
I agree, even if the director is a racist pos.
SargerusBR
I love Pokken!
refreshing HBO Go like crazy
BlackGhost
Banned
Almost game time my friends, lessssssgo!
BlackGhost
Banned
UP! HBO now
smokeymicpot
Beat EviLore at pool.
Its up.
The Artisan
Member
Have fun GAF! See you at 10, maybe
No, my original point to you was this:
When I made that original post, I didn't realize that your stance was that of it already being disproven. I thought it was of you in disbelief of it but not denying its plausibility. And my original point was that if it were true, then it would devalue the previous twist.
- Status