Topher
Identifies as young
That's the PS5 score. PC is at 79.
A lot fewer reviewers on the PC side. 66 PS5 reviews. Only 5 PC reviews.
That's the PS5 score. PC is at 79.
A lot fewer reviewers on the PC side. 66 PS5 reviews. Only 5 PC reviews.
These aren't all Japanese films, Silk is Thai I think and Wishing Stairs is S. Korean, but I feel this this game is basically a dream come true for people who sought out those Tartan DVDs back in the day.This is all because umbrellas and yellow raincoats aren't scary.
True, that's why OC is better since it has them both together (currently 75)
Either way there's just way too many better games to play than this
I can count 1 and that is elden ring. nothing else of note has been released recently imo
just a reminder than the way better Evil Within 1 had a way lower score than the dogshit sequel...
Horizon FWI can count 1 and that is elden ring. nothing else of note has been released recently imo
Yeah the tew2 is better in every waySpeak for yourself, sir.
TEW2 was a much better game than the first one.
Horizon Forbidden West is certainly "of note" and has received great reviews.
Speak for yourself, sir.
TEW2 was a much better game than the first one.
-
On topic, I'm surprised the MC is in the mid 70s, I thought this would score higher for sure.
Why is it a shame?Shame that his went through and not another Evil Within sequel, loved those 2 games.
and "great reviews" is a useless metric
Thats because gaming is rated on a 6-10 scale. Movies arent. With movies, you get a big range of review scores on a standard 1-5 or A-F scale.It’s funny how Metacritic has some double standards shenanigans for Games and Movies.
A 75 MC blockbuster movie is considered a huge achievement and automatically a surprise hit. A 75 MC game is considered a flop, unplayable, “buy on sale”, deeply flawed and other stuff.
If that is how you feel then that is fine, but a lot of folks, including myself, look to reviews overall to make decisions on what games to buy. So no.....not useless at all in that respect.
Which is totally weird, IMO. A bad game should be below 5 to better picture its quality for the potential buyer.Thats because gaming is rated on a 6-10 scale. Movies arent. With movies, you get a big range of review scores on a standard 1-5 or A-F scale.
Even bad games games somehow get a 5 or 6.
No. All you need to do is find a few reviewers that have the same taste in games as you and then you use their reviews as a gauge to decide if you pick up a game or not. That's how I decide.so you listen to the opinion of people that often clearly hate their job, that are rushing through games in order to have the review ready for embargo day, that sometimes deduct points because of their political agendas and that often are too stupid to play games properly that aren't walking sims?
Not sure how old you are and how long you've seen game reviews, but back in the 80s and at least some of the 90s, you got a wide range of scores. PC Gamer would give games 20 or 30% out of 100% all the time. And old game mag my bros bought would gives Ds and Fs no problem. The second the internet popped up and became popular in the 2000s, game scores all perked up to minimum 5. Only a tiny number of truly bad games get under 5/10.Which is totally weird, IMO. A bad game should be below 5 to better picture its quality for the potential buyer.
so you listen to the opinion of people that often clearly hatetheir job, that are rushing through games in order to have tge review ready for embargo day and that often are too stupid to play games properly that aren't walking sims?
why? we are talking about people here who are sometimes literally too stupid to make circle motions on an analog stick (actually happened in a review of Wonderful 101 where the reviewer in question had issues forming the fist formation in the game that literally demands of you to *drumm roll* move the right stick in a circle)
we are talking about people that sometimes argue that they don't have to finish the games they review or engage with mechanics in the game and still think they are able to publish adequate reviews.
for every reciewer out there that actually likes what they are doing and actually wants to publish a well though out review there are 2 that barely can hold a controller correctly or are part-time activists that happen to alsoneed to write reviews to keep their jobs
I'm going to wait until I don't have anything better to play. So, probably forever.I don’t usually say this but…
…I’ll wait until it’s on gamepass