CrocMother
Banned
Say that was the last female gorilla on the planet. Do we still kill the gorilla?
Parents bring a kid to a baseball game. Gets hit by a ball in the stands.
Protective services?
Parents bring a kid to a baseball game. Gets hit by a ball in the stands.
Protective services?
Those signs do little to actually keep kids out of the areas. They are not a physical barrier. Signs are not people proof. If you want to end the possibility of kids getting into such spaces you need adequate measures.
Parents are prone to human error like in this case.
Say that was the last female gorilla on the planet. Do we still kill the gorilla?
Could be worse. Could be one of those situations where they kill the animal AFTER it killed a person. That's the kind of shit I never understood. Like there will be a bear attack in a forest, and then park rangers will go kill the bear. Like bro, it's a fucking bear, what do you expect? That's what predators do, they find prey, kill them and eat them.
Parents bring a kid to a baseball game. Gets hit by a ball in the stands.
Protective services?
Say that was the last female gorilla on the planet. Do we still kill the gorilla?
Bears are typically fearful of humans.
An actual parallel to your example: a gorilla gets out of its cage and grabs a child. That's not what happened here.
If you can't properly supervise your children then you shouldn't have them.
If it was endangered, they'd probably keep it in a private, 100% secured habitat, not a public zoo where any manner of fuckery could happen.
An actual parallel to your example: a gorilla gets out of its cage and grabs a child. That's not what happened here.
If you can't properly supervise your children then you shouldn't have them.
Say that was the last female gorilla on the planet. Do we still kill the gorilla?
An actual parallel to your example: a gorilla gets out of its cage and grabs a child. That's not what happened here.
If you can't properly supervise your children then you shouldn't have them.
Of course. Evolution decided the gorilla's are not long for this world.
I know, but it's a hypothetical question. How valuable is the life of one 4 year old, really?
West coast grizzly bears aren't.
Yeah. It'd be an even sadder story, but you always save the 4 year old human.Say that was the last female gorilla on the planet. Do we still kill the gorilla?
Could be worse. Could be one of those situations where they kill the animal AFTER it killed a person. That's the kind of shit I never understood. Like there will be a bear attack in a forest, and then park rangers will go kill the bear. Like bro, it's a fucking bear, what do you expect? That's what predators do, they find prey, kill them and eat them.
Ok, if a gorilla throws a bunch of bananas really hard at a 4-year-old outside the gorilla pit and knocks him out cold...
Child services?
If it took a human life it needs to be destroyed. When I was working out west a cougar killed a female hiker in the area. Rangers hunted it down and destroyed it. It should be the fate of all man-eaters.
Oh yea, that's a high-quality barrier right there.
FUCKS SAKE - anyone can crawl through that shit! And all they had beyond it was BUSHES?
I'm shocked more kids don't fall over into that 'enclosure'.
That is a guaranteed lawsuit right there. That zoo is paying that kid's medical bills and putting him through college.
What would you expect a predator to do when it encountered a human?
I'm not even much into animal preservation, but this just makes no sense to me. What would you expect a predator to do when it encountered a human?
Watched the video. The gorilla looks to be protecting the child :-/ It cuts off before any shooting happens, but there was no rough handling of the child at all, it honestly lookedl ike the gorilla was trying to help. Towards the end people start shout that the gorilla is drowning the kid, but at that point everything is out of view and you can't see what's going on.
It's possible it got more aggressive after the video cuts off though, sad for all parties involved though
I blame the zoo.
If a 4-year-old is able to climb or maneuver his way into a gorilla enclosure, then they failed to secure the enclosure properly. Parents shouldn't HAVE to worry about their child getting into an "enclosure" with a dangerous animal at a zoo. It should be assumed it wouldn't be possible except in the most extreme cases, and CERTAINLY not with a 4-year-old.
This should never happen. It shouldn't be possible. The zoo has to approach their security and animal enclosures from every conceivable point of view.
They failed and have only themselves to blame.
It's not like the toddler had bolt cutters or planned to break in over a period of days and weeks.
The fencing or whatever it was was not good enough and it was defeated by a curious 4-year-old who just climbed and crawled through. That's not a secured enclosure.
The zoo is to blame. Period.
IN FACT, I would SUE the zoo if I were the parents.
WLWT said:OConnor says she heard the 4-year-old saying he wanted to jump into the gorillas habitat before the incident. The boys mother was also tending to several other young children.
The little boy himself had already been talking about wanting to ... get in the water. The mother's like, 'No, you're not, no, you're not,' OConnor said.
So, if your kid got hit by a baseball, you are a jackshit parent?
You look down and see that your kid disappeared in the second you looked away because of a distraction. Do you look to the crowd or the enclosure to find your kid?
Ok, if a gorilla throws a bunch of bananas really hard at a 4-year-old outside the gorilla pit and knocks him out cold...
Child services?
In general, I don't disagree with this at all, but in this case I think the barrier wasn't the problem. Mirroring what was said above, this is the first incident in 40 years - with thousands of kids entering the Zoo per day, I wouldn't say this particular public barrier was ineffective. If the Zoo was advertising this area as a "let your child run around ", then they would absolutely be at fault, but they weren't. Clear signs state kids are the parents responsibility and should be looked after at all times. Yes there's an inherent and, in some cases, uncontrollable risk that the kid could just leg it - but this is a risk that parents accept when taking their kids pretty much anywhere.
Fucking hell I started watching the video and stopped it immediately.
Absolutely, your post reminded me of this reddit post:
https://www.reddit.com/r/nosleep/comments/19fmjf/autopilot/
We should not have zoos. We should stop using animals for trivial purposes and human curiosity. Very sad.
That's what i say. Animals shouldn't be confined to relatively tiny areas just for our amusement.We should not have zoos. We should stop using animals for trivial purposes and human curiosity. Very sad.
We should not have zoos. We should stop using animals for trivial purposes and human curiosity. Very sad.
Swing and a miss.
I disagree, zoos serve an important function in education. And I don't just mean "come look at the animals boys and girls!" I mean many have programs in things like animal biology, and work with local universities to varying capacities. With that said, what we need is to guarantee the animals the best life within reason. Far too many are kept in cages too small, or in regions they are not equipped to handle without the proper facilities. And then there are others like this story which have a failure of proper barriers to keep people out.
You're talking, but you don't understand what you're talking about.If you can't properly supervise your children then you shouldn't have them.
West coast grizzly bears aren't.
I don't know what "west coast grizzly bears" are. To my knowledge the California grizzly is the only west coast brown bear, and it's extinct. Unless you're speaking of like Canadaland and Alaska. Those are probably areas not populated enough to give bears the fear of man.
Is it really? That's easy to say from a humans perspective.
Sad story all around.