Actually, both are a little underpowered for the HD era.Mojovonio said:PS3 is much more powerful.
/thread
PC, Wii, DS.

Yeah, I didn't mention AA because that's obvious. Here are a few comments from the in-game screenshot thread.dark10x said:Ah, I see. I certainly can agree with that. AA and AF are clearly added when the tool is used (though mild AF seems to be in use while playing as well).
"all they add is AA and upscaling."
"The screenshots look like the game. The only difference is they add anti-ailiasing so the photos don't have jaggies."
"Yeah, looks exactly like that, a little more jaggy."
"This thread was really misleading. Holy shit if the game looked like this."
"It looked like these when I played it a bit ago."
"this photomode crap has to stop. Total misrepresentation fo the game.."
Stinkles:
"ALIASING.
Serious Business!
Post some shots or get out."
Added foliage (LOD) and AF was news to me.
I don't hate Halo or Bungie. I think it's slightly overrated and the art/enemy design is atrocious, but I can see why many people love the games.
I just hate this ongoing bullshot-photomode for in-game, CGI trailer, target render bullshit. Most of them still do it and it fucking annoys me.
edit:
HokieJoe said:What it looks like to me is the foliage is simply blurred more thus giving the illusion of there being more foliage. ...



