And no one's ever seen her with it until the first time she's ever commented about Palestine.But they only make my autism toy in this shape
And no one's ever seen her with it until the first time she's ever commented about Palestine.But they only make my autism toy in this shape
Antisemitic imagery for the past 100 years.
Early 20th century:
Nazi Germany:
Modern:
So the toy wasn't a coincidence then? Utterly abhorrent fuck her then.Now I understand why some people had a blue octopus in their pictures.
This really is a resurgence in antisemitism. Not even a century has passed since the holocaust.
Antisemitic imagery for the past 100 years.
Early 20th century:
Nazi Germany:
Modern:
Honestly, it's probably just an unfortunate coincidence but you never know.So the toy wasn't a coincidence then? Utterly abhorrent fuck her then.
Coincidence sounds like a stretch here IMO.Honestly, it's probably just an unfortunate coincidence but you never know.
So the toy wasn't a coincidence then? Utterly abhorrent fuck her then.
I hope the IDF can be creative. What they need is some Wonder flower that changes the outcome. Some Israeli operation were very creative, and I think this one needs that. It needs to be a surprise, something they didn't anticipate. Brute force will be costly. Personally, I would just level Gaza, we warned the people there to flee south.Per FT. ~50,000 terrorist soldiers in Gaza, between Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Gaza is of a similar size to Mosul (about 2x), where we fought ISIS. Mosul had 8,000 ISIS fighters and took 100,000 US-coalition troops to clear, with 8,000 allied lives lost and 10,000 civilians killed. Mosul took nine months.
The invasion will be extremely difficult.
Military briefing: Battle for Mosul points to IDF’s ‘fiendish’ task in Gaza
Israeli military likely to face houses rigged to explode, fighters wearing civilian clothes and weapons stored in mosqueswww.ft.com
“
The mission to clear the city of jihadi militants was ultimately successful. But the fighting was intense, took three times longer than planned, left 10,000 civilians dead, and killed more coalition soldiers than expected.
The battle to recapture the northern Iraqi city of Mosul from Isis in 2016 is a potential guide to what may happen if Israeli forces launch a ground offensive against Hamas militants in Gaza. It also offers a cautionary tale for the Israeli troops massing for the widely expected attack.
“It’s going to be fiendishly difficult,” said David Petraeus, a former US general who led Iraq’s allied forces during the 2007 “surge” and then Nato and US forces in Afghanistan. “I just can’t imagine more difficult circumstances.”
Benjamin Netanyahu, prime minister of Israel, and his war cabinet have clearly set out their war aims after Hamas fighters killed about 1,400 Israelis and took more than 200 people hostage in a surprise attack on October 7. The tasks for Israel’s armed forces are fourfold: topple the Hamas regime and destroy its military capabilities; remove the threat of attacks from Gaza; secure the return of hostages held by Hamas; and defend Israel’s borders and citizens.
But as the battle for Mosul shows, achieving just the first of these objectives is likely to be a gruelling task. Among the challenges facing Israel Defense Forces in Gaza, military officials and analysts said, are likely to be houses rigged to explode, fighters wearing civilian clothes, military facilities hidden underneath schools and other civilian structures, and weapons stored in mosques. Hamas is also deeply embedded in Palestinian society.
“Urban warfare is just one problem after another,” said a western special forces officer who accompanied Iraqi forces fighting in Mosul six years ago. “There is also no limit to the troop requirements,” he added. “Even if Israel sent 10mn soldiers into Gaza, it would still take a long time. And that’s just taking the territory; holding it is another matter.” The special forces officer added: “A more realistic mission would be to send in the IDF to damage a chunk of Hamas’ capabilities, eliminate enough of the leadership, and then pull back.”
Petraeus agreed Israel’s military commanders were likely to be discussing a range of options with the war cabinet and “explaining: look, we can destroy Hamas, but here’s what it would take. This is what it would mean.” A stream of western leaders and senior officials have delivered similar messages.
Rishi Sunak, UK prime minister, arrived in Israel on Thursday to show support but also to advise restraint. Similarly, US president Joe Biden in Tel Aviv the day before said Israel should not be “consumed” by rage and needed to avoid repeating the “mistakes” Washington made after the September 2001 terror attacks.
The battle for Mosul — which is similar in size to Gaza’s urban areas and had a comparable population of about 2mn when the city was occupied by Isis — began on October 16 2016. Inside the city were roughly 8,000 Isis fighters, compared with Gaza where Hamas has an estimated 30,000 to 40,000 fighters and Palestinian Islamic Jihad another 15,000 men under arms. Ranged against the militants in Mosul was an attacking force of 100,000 US-led Iraqi forces, compared with more than 160,000 troops in Israel’s standing army and 360,000 newly mobilised reservists.
In the skies above Mosul, international coalition planes provided constant surveillance and air strikes — similar to the Israeli fighter jets that have been hitting hundreds of Hamas targets. “Intelligence soaks”, by drones and other forms of surveillance, provided a detailed set of targets for them to attack.
Initial progress in Mosul was swift, but soon slowed as the attackers encountered fierce resistance. The Pentagon adjusted its rules on the use of air power, allowing air strikes to take place with less oversight. But Isis fighters then packed hundreds of civilians into government buildings to use as human shields, sometimes moving them through tunnels from one fighting position to another. Half-destroyed buildings surrounded by rubble, meanwhile, provided the jihadis with what one US commander described as ideal bomb-proof shelters.
“Cities have thousands of hiding places,” said the special forces officer. “If you want to remove an enemy, you have to clear the area house by house. But that puts you in 360 degrees of danger. You can’t just sweep through.” The battle for Mosul claimed the lives of 8,000 soldiers from the US-led coalition, and a fight expected to take three months ultimately took nine. “Hamas knows Gaza far better than [Isis] knew Mosul,” Petraeus said. “Moreover, it took us nine months [to capture Mosul] and Israel does not have that time . . . They know that international public opinion is going to shift . . . as the damage accumulates, and innocent civilians are killed.”
What the IDF does have is a series of carefully worked out plans to destroy Hamas’s capabilities, according to a 2017 study by the Rand Corporation, a Washington think-tank with ties to the US military. Ranked as small, medium and large, the plans were worked out before the IDF’s last ground invasion of Gaza in 2014. The smallest one involved the IDF taking control of northern Gaza without entering populated areas — a situation similar to the current state of fighting there. The medium plan envisaged a larger ground incursion into northern and southern areas. The largest plan involved taking all of Gaza. Although the plans remain secret, Israeli defence planners have worked out the forces needed to conduct each operation, according to the Rand study. Israel has also established a clear command and control structure, overseen by the general staff but operationally led by IDF’s southern command. Nevertheless, despite this careful planning, the chances of a swift Israeli operation in Gaza are slight.
Isis had only two years to ready its defences in Mosul while Hamas has had several in Gaza, said John Spencer, a former US major now at the Modern War Institute at West Point, speaking on a recent podcast about the potential offensive. Adding to the intricacies of Gaza’s terrain is a huge network of tunnels built by Hamas under the strip. Gaza City also has about 60 buildings of six floors or taller, versus almost none so tall in Mosul, according to Michael Knights at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. “The IDF may yet surprise us,” said Ben Barry, a former British armoured infantry battalion commander. “In the end, it is all relative: if the defenders are highly motivated and well supplied with weapons that can produce a sufficient density of effective fire to stop the attackers, they can hold. If they don’t, it is another matter.”
"
If they took time to make signs, and not just a post, they took time to think what to put in that picture. Not to mention there was zero mention of the hostages or 1500 Jews butchered.Honestly, it's probably just an unfortunate coincidence but you never know.
Say, she deliberately did put the octopus there, what would be her motive to do so? A dogwhistle to show she is a true antisemite?Yes. This is not just a person who has some pity for Palestinians. It's full on racism on display.
Say, she deliberately did put the octopus there, what would be her motive to do so? A dogwhistle to show she is a true antisemite?
I doubt many people would have recognized the octopus as being antisemitic, if it weren't for the uproar. It borders to a conspiracy theory.
We had protests for years saying "Free Palestine" which was always a dog whistle for the annihilation of Israel, most people didn't think it meant that. Most people prob still don't even when they chant from the river to the sea.Say, she deliberately did put the octopus there, what would be her motive to do so? A dogwhistle to show she is a true antisemite?
I doubt many people would have recognized the octopus as being antisemitic, if it weren't for the uproar. It borders to a conspiracy theory.
Such meta-messages are not aimed at normal people but at organizations, mostly political ones so it doesn't matter if they're denying it to people, as long as the people they want the message to reach get it.Say, she deliberately did put the octopus there, what would be her motive to do so? A dogwhistle to show she is a true antisemite?
I doubt many people would have recognized the octopus as being antisemitic, if it weren't for the uproar. It borders to a conspiracy theory.
You mean when their handlers make signs in that greta pictures, those are 4 disinterested pawns being used , I doubt those 4 even understand what they are doingWe had protests for years saying "Free Palestine" which was always a dog whistle for the annihilation of Israel, most people didn't think it meant that. Most people prob still don't even when they chant from the river to the sea.
When people make signs, sit for a photo-op, and specifically place a doll there for the photo-op, than believe them.
Maybe it's time to stop thinking people didn't mean this or that when they tell you and show you exactly who they are. And again, she didn't say one word about the slaughter of Jews.
It looks like this thing (https://www.amazon.com/TeeTurtle-Reversible-Octopus-Mini-Plush/) which sells on amazon, with "emotional support plushie" reviews FWIW. And I think it's on the knee of the "Climate Justice NOW" chick, so maybe that dame is the real anti-semite in the photo. My opinion of Greta is about as low as possible, so it's meaningless to me who put the plushie there.And no one's ever seen her with it until the first time she's ever commented about Palestine.
She shows me a lot of ignorance with her sign and her silence regarding the Israeli victims of Hamas terrorists. She is on the wrong side here. So I agree with you.We had protests for years saying "Free Palestine" which was always a dog whistle for the annihilation of Israel, most people didn't think it meant that. Most people prob still don't even when they chant from the river to the sea.
When people make signs, sit for a photo-op, and specifically place a doll there for the photo-op, than believe them.
Maybe it's time to stop thinking people didn't mean this or that when they tell you and show you exactly who they are. And again, she didn't say one word about the slaughter of Jews.
I don't know what to tell you. I don't know why people keep thinking people are stupid and infantilizing anything that doesn't make sense to them. They are all grown up, they are in their late teens, they are not dumb and they know what they are holding and what it means. Please stop making excuses for them.You mean when their handlers make signs in that greta pictures, those are 4 disinterested pawns being used , I doubt those 4 even understand what they are doing
US intercepted 4 cruise missiles and 15 drones headed for Israel in the attack yesterday.
But that's the thing, it strikes you as odd. Why is it there? It's not a coincidence, it was placed there for the photo-op.She shows me a lot of ignorance with her sign and her silence regarding the Israeli victims of Hamas terrorists. She is on the wrong side here. So I agree with you.
She also shows me a stuffed, blue animal, which strikes me as odd. She could be signalling pure, hateful antisemitism there, but I am not so sure.
I have no idea under what circumstance this picture was taken. Was it meticulously orchestrated? Possibly. Was it just a informal, posed picture at some guy's/girl's place? Who knows.But that's the thing, it strikes you as odd. Why is it there? It's not a coincidence, it was placed there for the photo-op.
I don't know what to tell you. I don't know why people keep thinking people are stupid and infantilizing anything that doesn't make sense to them. They are all grown up, they are in their late teens, they are not dumb and they know what they are holding and what it means. Please stop making excuses for them.
,
She's def being 'handled' but still, who's doing it, what's the reason. it's pretty disgusting.I don't think people are stupid. Those college protestor and pro Palestinians protestor are vile,
I'm being very specific to greta thunburg, she's a total pawn , mindless and obedient, selectively mute, translation only can read from a script,
Maybe the other 3
but regardless you're right they don't deserve an excuse and should be confronted and ideally face consequences for their complicity with hamas's evil
The expose from earlier got picked up. This is the lead author of the NY Times article on the Gaza hospital explosion.
“
A New York Times reporter who came under fire last year for a praising Adolf Hitler in multiple resurfaced Facebook posts was rehired by the Gray Lady to cover the Israel-Palestine war.
Palestinian filmmaker Soliman Hijjy hailed the Nazi leader as recently as 2018 in a post on Facebook, when he shared a photo of himself captioned that he was “in a state of harmony as Hitler was during the Holocaust,” per a translation from Arabic by pro-Israel media watchdog site HonestReporting.
“
And no one's ever seen her with it until the first time she's ever commented about Palestine.
Her asshat parents are probably part of it, gotta look like you support the "underdog" even when the "underdog" is a group of murderous scum to get invited to the right partiesShe's def being 'handled' but still, who's doing it, what's the reason. it's pretty disgusting.
What I don't get is where the hate is coming from toward the Jews. The muslims, I can understand, but the Indian American lawyer? Like what motivates her? I mean at this point it's quite clear all these people coming out of the woodwork wants israel gone. The dog whistles are unambiguous at this point, delivered with the kind of bravado you would have when you think victory is at hand and there won't be consequences.We had protests for years saying "Free Palestine" which was always a dog whistle for the annihilation of Israel, most people didn't think it meant that. Most people prob still don't even when they chant from the river to the sea.
When people make signs, sit for a photo-op, and specifically place a doll there for the photo-op, than believe them.
Maybe it's time to stop thinking people didn't mean this or that when they tell you and show you exactly who they are. And again, she didn't say one word about the slaughter of Jews.
Common sense would say that the world needs to see the ugliness committed by these terrorists and DO something about it. Yes, we need people signing petitions and exposure for the release of the hostages. Even given the nature of the enemy, it'd be incredibly ignorant to assume they're all dead. You'd probably want the whole world looking for you and given all the nationalities of the hostages too...this would be logical.I'm legit confused on the hostage posters. Why are people putting them up around the world? What's the purpose here, I assume it's just to put faces to those currently captured by Hamas?
I think the issue is that these people making anti-Semitic remarks and going pro-Hamas were either:What I don't get is where the hate is coming from toward the Jews. The muslims, I can understand, but the Indian American lawyer? Like what motivates her? I mean at this point it's quite clear all these people coming out of the woodwork wants israel gone. The dog whistles are unambiguous at this point, delivered with the kind of bravado you would have when you think victory is at hand and there won't be consequences.
I get that it's an extremely accessible plush toy, but don't you find it odd even one bit that it is featured in the picture/Tweet?Yeah, so, for what it's worth, the octopus plushy is a very popular thing. I have the exact same one that Greta has in that shot. My kid gave it to me, and it's sitting on my work desk. It's reversible. Angry/sad one way, happy the other. Mine's currently angry.
It's a child's toy. What even is this bullshit drama over it?
Shit's got me defending Greta Thunberg.
What a world.
What I don't get is where the hate is coming from toward the Jews. The muslims, I can understand, but the Indian American lawyer? Like what motivates her? I mean at this point it's quite clear all these people coming out of the woodwork wants israel gone. The dog whistles are unambiguous at this point, delivered with the kind of bravado you would have when you think victory is at hand and there won't be consequences.
No one wants to state plainly that one big reason that the US should keep supporting Israel here is that if they are left to fend for themselves and get attack by other nations they'll use their nukes, they have no qualms about that to protect their territory.
What I don't get is where the hate is coming from toward the Jews. The muslims, I can understand, but the Indian American lawyer? Like what motivates her? I mean at this point it's quite clear all these people coming out of the woodwork wants israel gone. The dog whistles are unambiguous at this point, delivered with the kind of bravado you would have when you think victory is at hand and there won't be consequences.
Are you sure she is indian (not that there aren't a lot of idiot indian leftists)? Choudhary is a pretty common surname in Pakistani Punjab too. A lot of Hindus who were converted to Islam in that area kept their original surnames.
No one wants to state plainly that one big reason that the US should keep supporting Israel here is that if they are left to fend for themselves and get attack by other nations they'll use their nukes, they have no qualms about that to protect their territory.
I can't follow this back to the original context, I don't know who this is, but yeah most Indians are among the most staunchly Israel-supporting country outside of the US as they're quite familiar with being plagued by terrorism from a neighbour since inception. Israelis are also the country with the highest favorable impression of India. It's a weird mutual love boner thing. Choudhary is indeed sometimes a surname kept from families that were forcefully converted to Islam either in Mughal times or at partition if they were stuck in Pakistan, where you know there's not a lot of Hindus left. Or if not, there are always those trying to be so cool and uber woke to the point of self destruction, all as Kitoo said.
If Mia Kahlifa, an ethnically Maronite Lebanese porn star can be vile enough to support Hamas, there are no limits to how wide a range of people can be useful idiots.
The expose from earlier got picked up. This is the lead author of the NY Times article on the Gaza hospital explosion.
“
A New York Times reporter who came under fire last year for a praising Adolf Hitler in multiple resurfaced Facebook posts was rehired by the Gray Lady to cover the Israel-Palestine war.
Palestinian filmmaker Soliman Hijjy hailed the Nazi leader as recently as 2018 in a post on Facebook, when he shared a photo of himself captioned that he was “in a state of harmony as Hitler was during the Holocaust,” per a translation from Arabic by pro-Israel media watchdog site HonestReporting.
“