Stuff: "Remember Zoids? Those little, plastic, clip-together robo-dinosaur things from the 80s that youd wind-up and send marching across a table at whatever other toys you had knocking around at the time? You dont? Well someone at Guerilla Games must do, because Ill be damned if theyre not the genesis for the attention-grabbing enemies in Horizon Zero Dawn."
Good Stuff
The mechanical dino-animals are brilliantly realised
Genuinely compelling setting and story
Lots of the mechanics are borrowed, but they work
Looks utterly gorgeous, particularly on a Pro
Bad Stuff
Melee combat is rather basic
Your dialogue decisions amount to very little
Yahoo review?
They on Metacritic?
Trust me, as a huge western fan, I completely agree. The atmosphere and world design of RDR is perfection.
And like most open world games, I spent more time in the world, exploring, and taking in the sights than doing story missions
They on Metacritic?
Will it be on Metacritic tho.
I always look at the cons of a review to put it in perspective. Like, if this is the worst you could come up with, this is gonna be damn good.
They on Metacritic?
Your dialogue decisions amount to very little
What about OpenCritic? Don't they just compile everything instead of picking which ones are worthy?Does not seem like it. Sorry just posting reviews i find.
Does not seem like it. Sorry just posting reviews i find.
Yeah people need to stop asking if stuff is on metacritic it does not matter!I think it's fine, the thread shouldn't be only for reviews accepted for Metacritic (imo).
Will it be on Metacritic tho.
Yup.
thisisneogaf.gifNope.
Skate 4 isn't coming out any time soonSigh.. Everybody ignores the greatest sports game on the market
It matters and you damn well know it...Yeah people need to stop asking if stuff is on metacritic it does not matter!
Is Dualshockers on Metacritic? I'm not sure if the same reviews does everything there, (shouldn't be possible) but they definitely seem to value gameplay and strong stories. I think they will give Horizon a 9.5 or even a perfect score.
They are on metacritic but how do you know what score they might give the game.
Looks like it settled at 88, I don't think it's going to move in either direction unless EDGE gives it either a 10 or a 6.
NoWill it be on Metacritic tho.
NopeYup.
RDR is a suspension bridge. It's supported in the beginning and in the end by two very strong females but the middle is dire.
Even edge give a 6, it still hold 88
It's not badI've never understood why people think the Mexico part of RDR is so bad
I actually like this. Dialogue trees are annoying.That's unfortunate, but not deal breaker.
I've never understood why people think the Mexico part of RDR is so bad
I've never understood why people think the Mexico part of RDR is so bad
This Playstation Access video says the game has Mass Effect levels of depth in the dialogue wheels, letting you learn more about the lore and world if you want to, and Witcher-esque morality in that choices are not clear-cut good or bad, and can come back to bite youI actually like this. Dialogue trees are annoying.
RDR has a strong first act and third one, the middle is where it's hit and miss, there're these characters: The graveyard man, the magic potion seller and the drunk, that provides pretty uninteresting quests that belong to the main plot and it's super boring when you you want to do is face Bill Williamson. That part was really boring to me. In mexico starts to get better again but it takes its time.
The Witcher III goes great until you get to Novigrad (don't kill me) and you have to find Dandelion... terribly boring to me, searching to all his girlfriends and stuff... I had to replay the game because I lost my save and when I reached there I literally abandoned it. It picks up again when you reach the last third of the game although the climax is really bland.
Nope.
Nope.
Both.Does this game have an ending or is it the next big franchise in the making, i.e. God of War II or Halo II?
What would the score have been if not for that one low review score? 90/91?
Well considering I stopped playing RDR half way through Mexico, and stopped playing Witcher 3 when I had to track down Dandelion in Novigrad, I'd say you're on to something here.
It is still both. Reviews have pointed out that many questions are answered and it ends on a good note in terms of winding down and completing the narrative that preceded it.Does this game have an ending or is it the next big franchise set into perpetual motion, i.e. God of War II or Halo II?
This is kind of what I'm predicating my interest on. I'm just not very interested in franchises that are set into perpetual motion by never having a cohesive self contained story.
Edited for clarity. I know this is going to have a sequel.
I've never understood why people think the Mexico part of RDR is so bad
Does this game have an ending or is it the next big franchise set into perpetual motion, i.e. God of War II or Halo II?
This is kind of what I'm predicating my interest on. I'm just not very interested in franchises that are set into perpetual motion by never having a cohesive self contained story.
Edited for clarity. I know this is going to have a sequel.
By the end, Horizon comes to a satisfying conclusion in a way that left me feeling like they should probably never make a sequel. It's a near-perfect story that creates a world and also provides meaningful answers about said world. Not to soapbox about it, but games don't do that often enough anymore. The events of Horizon have weight and the game feels less like franchise building and more like a cohesive statement.
I always look at the cons of a review to put it in perspective. Like, if this is the worst you could come up with, this is gonna be damn good.
That's unfortunate, but not deal breaker.
Phew! I'm glad Jeff knows what's up. Thank you for snipping that bit for me; I hadn't had the chance to sit and read reviews, especially to parse for that specific bit of info, but will read the rest of giantbomb's. This addresses my concerns in its entirety.Giant Bomb Review:
Phew! I'm glad Jeff knows what's up. Thank you for snipping that bit for me; I hadn't had the chance to sit and read reviews, especially to parse for that specific bit of info, but will read the rest of giantbomb's. This addresses my concerns in its entirety.
It's not bad
It's just not as good