Opinions, how do they workImo reviewer clearly let her emotions impact her score or was done for attention
I deeply regret reading the 4chan spoilers. I really wasnt expecting this amount of praise.
with the 3 reviews left to score, can it reach 90 atleast?
Is there tons of grinding in this game? I don't have time for that if so![]()
Imo reviewer clearly let her emotions impact her score.
I know rightThe dreaded 8.8
Or you know, opinions and she just didn't enjoy the game.
We all know it's important for people to review things in as antiseptic a way as possible. Perhaps they should have focused on number of lines of dialogue or number of side quests. That way we get some analytical, unequivocal content. Gotta kill that emotional response.
![]()
And that's a problem because...
Or do you think people's emotions, personal experience, and perspectives don't impact every review score ever?
Edge and what are the other two?
with the 3 reviews left to score, can it reach 90 atleast?
Why are so few reviews even mentioning the dungeons/cauldrons? Are they not allowed to talk about them or were they simply not done?
Gamers are the worst fam, them forever apologizing for the mediocrity that is 3D Zelda is nothing new.SS got a 93 meta... Gaming media have no objectivity when it comes to Zelda. BotW actually looks great so it will probably get a 97-98 meta though. 94+ is a lock.
Yeah, that is a bit strange. In one review (Easy Allies I think it was) they outright said, they can't talk about those yet.
with the 3 reviews left to score, can it reach 90 atleast?
no, that review is dragging it down , too far from the other scores, it's like 50/100
Yeah, it is fairly evident in the tone of the review. I mean I have graded papers that, if I was to go with personal standards, would have failed to meet the criteria, but because of the context and situation, it wasn't appropriate to do so. Also, in study it is a learning experience to a degree, and you don't necessarily want to shoot people down straight away.
BRocknRolla: Strawman argument. Of course emotions affect your judgement, but that is why there are criteria and weighting. To balance judgement.
it's not a problem if it's professionally done which in this case was not. The reviewer was clearly again in my opinion not being professionally objective.
it's not a problem if it's professionally done which in this case was not. The reviewer was clearly again in my opinion not being professionally objective.
Nintendo games are reviewed by Nintendo fans most of the time so I take them with a grain of salt.
I deeply regret reading the 4chan spoilers. I really wasnt expecting this amount of praise.
I always loved the combat encounters in KZ too, and from the sounds of it, it's a huge part of HZD's successful gameplay, right?
Im still trying to grasp the comparisons people made to Far Cry and actual RPGs. Is the game in between that, in that it's not full out RPG, but retains hints of RPG elements, or strips away the bloat?
I understand there is dialogue choices, but is it pointless like Witcher 3? It seems the heart of the game is different weapon types matching with enemy types. How deep is that? Is there where Zelda comparisons come?
Also, I really want this game to be impressive with lore. SIdequests do a good job of fleshing out the world, so does that mean you can take quests from numerous tribes while managing to learn the details of their cultures and histories while doing so?
And while the world looks varied, does it feel like its actually a big scale world? For example, galloping through Witcher's world or Skyrim feels so good. It feels like an adventure because it mixes some typical locales with stretches of nature. I guess Im asking just how BIG forests, mountains, etc. The idea of a full day system and weather makes me happy, but I always look for those long stretches of dark forest to turn the HUD off and just walk through.
Yet despite all that, Ive always been turned off by open world games as Ive always grown bored with them or hesitant. I loved the Witcher, but couldn't finish the game, mostly for the combat. Horizon sounds more and more promising, but Im incredibly hopeful the world has sprinkled in tons of "lore" or mystery to discover and think about. Some of that comes in discovering unexplained things, like finding ruins that have no direct explanation (think of how ICO games build a world).
It's hard to explain what I mean, but the Far Cry comparisons have always worried me a bit because those games dont feel as immersive as something like Shadow of the Colossus, Skyrim, Witcher, etc.
There is a very unique set of embargos on this one. Sort of like Gears 4 where Broll or specific footage had to be used and so forth until a later date.
http://www.reactiongifs.com/r/jlaw-whtvr.gif[IMG][/QUOTE]
S/he is right tho.
it's not a problem if it's professionally done which in this case was not. The reviewer was clearly again in my opinion not being professionally objective.
Metacritic should start dropping the highest and lowest scores from their average (they can still list them).
Nintendo games are reviewed by Nintendo fans most of the time so I take them with a grain of salt.
There is a very unique set of embargos on this one. Sort of like Gears 4 where Broll or specific footage had to be used and so forth until a later date.
Yeah, that is a bit strange. In one review (Easy Allies I think it was) they outright said, they can't talk about those yet.
Yeah, that is a bit strange. In one review (Easy Allies I think it was) they outright said, they can't talk about those yet.
Metacritic should start dropping the highest and lowest scores from their average (they can still list them).
I'm so glad that this isn't just a glorified tech demo without substance. Too bad (or rather good thing) that I will be occupied with Nioh for the near future otherwise I would've preordered already.
Why most of the reviews are not mentioning the dungeons/cauldrons? Are they not allowed to talk about them or were they simply not done?
The dreaded 8.8
I know right
Switch is going on the back burner for a while, what with Horizon, Nioh, Gravity Rush 2 and Persona I cant justify spending money on a new console for just one game.
I'm still cannot for the life of me understand ANYONE having this sort of fear based on all the gameplay videos we've gotten leading up to this. They've shown all kinds of stuff combat wise that indicates it would be anything other.
It's not like this game was a linear shooter, lol...
I wonder when they will be allowed to talk about them. Seems strange as they seem to be one of the better parts of the games side content.
no, that review is dragging it down , too far from the other scores, it's like 50/100
Not really, no. Is very hard to raise the average if the score is very high. It's much easier to lower it.
NieR Automata was robbed again, poor Taro. Zelda will overshadow it so hard. Makes me depressedThese few months are ridiculous. Yakuza 0, Horizon ZD, Switch and Zelda, Persona 5.
Yeesh.
I'm slowly getting to this point. I haven't even played Nioh or RE7 yet. Horizon looks awesome now too. Coming up on a hard decision soon for sure.