TheExodu5 said:I'd advise against the C400, unless it properly supports TRIM or fixes its current write issues. For the C300, once you've written to the whole drive, write speeds permanently decrease from around 180MB/s to 20MB/s.
This is not true as an owner of the drive. We covered this in the last thread, but that was a firmware 1 issue. Since 2 the GC is incredibly aggressive and the drive does not lose speed, even when filled to the brim. Ive emptied since, but Ive done this twice now, filling the SSD then running ASSD and the speeds are just fine before and after clearing the space again.
There was a single review out there claiming the speeds tanked, and the author screwed up his review and said the issue wasn't resolved in the newer firmware, but it was. Noone anywhere has been able to replicate the speed degradation since, and people have posted asking him to explain and its gone unanswered.
And all CS300 drives have been shipping with firmware 2 since July.
Edit: Here's a screen of a benchmark, again the drive isn't filled to the brim anymore, I only bothered to do that to test it a month or so ago, but the performance didn't drop even then. This was done with ASSD here just a few mins ago. Mines is a CS300 128GB. The 256's are faster.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90788/907880e731fed9c39049c086740cda3f5d24a604" alt="yVlP2.png"
In any case I think the crucial drives are pretty damn nice, the C400's aren't a big enough upgrade imo but the upcoming drives on the new SF arch will probably blaze. All I want from intel is some Sata 6 drivers. The Marvell drivers are shite. I've lately started to wonder if intel will be able to match or exceed the speed of crucials next drives. Intel drives do still have that superior 4k random read though.