hinch7
Member
Hah true. I wonder what masochrist would play it on that mode though. Looks like if someone poured vasaline over the screen.It’s a double-edged sword. You also don’t wanna show off how bad the base version looks lol.
Hah true. I wonder what masochrist would play it on that mode though. Looks like if someone poured vasaline over the screen.It’s a double-edged sword. You also don’t wanna show off how bad the base version looks lol.
They really released that 7 min video with Mark Cerny, a blog post and went into hiding huh...
I expected Digital Foundry and other places to have videos ready to be released but...nothing.
They really are trying to sell an 800€ console based on that lil video alone lmao.
Agreed. I think we'll see some more soon.Not really, PS5 Pro is not even up for sale right now
It was just an announcement. They still have 2 weeks to show what it can do
Let’s be real. Anyone who buys the Pro is not going to wait a single day to purchase the PS6. We’re all junkies here. There is no outsider here to fool.The Pro will have to support cross-gen into the PS6 for at least 3 years to not be a complete ripoff.
Agh. Hard agree. No matter what it’s in the end this first step has been the worst decision they could make in every aspect pile one into another.They really released that 7 min video with Mark Cerny, a blog post and went into hiding huh...
I expected Digital Foundry and other places to have videos ready to be released but...nothing.
They really are trying to sell an 800€ console based on that lil video alone lmao.
Without doubt for me, the price is taking the piss. But so is everyone else these days. To the point where by, piss taking is being normalised unfortunately. It is what it is. As hardware goes, the PS5 does feel cheap with the plastics used and for me its very much a look but dont touch bit of kit. When I lay the Pro on the side, with its dainty little shitty plastic leg, it wont look like a £700 bit of kit should.I disagree. But I think it should come with a stand. Lol.
The EU prices are too high, but I don't think the NA price is unreasonable.
Its a pretty significant upgrade from PS5 fidelity modes.
I will say though, I think Sony fucked up. They should have nerded it up some more with actual numbers to show the real differences. As it is, they had a shitty feed showing people barely perceptible image differences and asking for $700. They should have gone with resolution and frame rate numbers and perhaps shown a grid to show how PSSR fills out the additional pixels and how much of a dramatic improvement it really is over FSR/TAA/IGTI.
This console is for enthusiasts, so they should have vehiculated their message to them. That 9 minutes demo showing 5 seconds clips didn't cut it.
Lol you gotta be shitting me
$700 for this where’s Waldo difference
Better IQ than base fidelity mode with double the framerates in a lot of cases. Literally what the PC does for their new hotness kidney cards.£700 quid for a shaper imagine LOL. SONY are ripping the piss
Yep. People jumped the gun and got hyperbolic now they're looking dumb.Better IQ than base fidelity mode with double the framerates in a lot of cases. Literally what the PC does for their new hotness kidney cards.
Yeah I just posted that. He also added that it also looks better than the fidelity mode."Why do we need the Pro?" - John and company
You just gushed over your gaslighting question the past year an half, John. Now you know why.
I mean, not to sound too harsh but the sorry state of the market is entirely your fault you know.
They really released that 7 min video with Mark Cerny, a blog post and went into hiding huh...
I expected Digital Foundry and other places to have videos ready to be released but...nothing.
They really are trying to sell an 800€ console based on that lil video alone lmao.
It's happening and supposedly it's a 1st party event next week.You know Sony has a rumored State of Play coming later this month, right?
Code named "Royal".
I think my brain was hurting having to adjust to 30 everytime I flipped backThese differences are easy to spot when actually playing the game natively from the console on a TV. However due to Youtube compression destroying a lot of the original quality, zoomed in comparisons help to illustrate the difference.
A game like Horizon Forbidden West drove me absolutely mad constantly switching between fidelity and performance modes. The fidelity mode was just so friggin' crisp and detailed, but of course was locked to 30 FPS. The 60 FPS performance mode was blissful for how fluid the motion was, especially in combat, but so much of the detail was sacrificed.
From what I understand these games are also going to be releasing relatively soon.
It's happening and supposedly it's a 1st party event next week.
Code named "Royal".
It sounds like we're getting the showcase we've been waiting for.
Good old fanboy John, keep it comingYeah I just posted that. He also added that it also looks better than the fidelity mode.
I like John.Good old fanboy John, keep it coming
I think my brain was hurting having to adjust to 30 everytime I flipped back
What an excellent barometer of someone's character lolI like John.
John likes Playstation, so he seems like a nice guy.
It's the only barometer that matters on Gaf.What an excellent barometer of someone's character lol
Yeah but its not a remake, so isnt it essentially just an upscaled version of an upscaled version? I honestly expect the next ND to make TLOU2 PS5 to look last gen.
It's the only barometer that matters on Gaf.
See I feel as though people really struggle with the facts.
Upscaled version of an upscaled version?
Like I don't think you know what upscaling means here.
There was a PS5 patch on the Ps4 game that would allow it to run at 60 fps, but it was still 1080p60.
The remaster upgraded that to 1440p60 in performance mode or 4K30 in fidelity mode. Once again, what's done here is 4K60.
So comparing this to the PS4 version of the game which ran at 1080p30 vs the PS5 Remaster on PS5 Pro which is 4K60... That's 4x the pixels and double the framerate of a title that came out 4 years ago. Hilarious that anyone doesn't realize what a jump that is, to call this "just a PS4 game"
The patch ran at 1440p60 I think, because the Pro version already ran at 1440p30.
Literally re-read my post...
Let’s be real. Anyone who buys the Pro is not going to wait a single day to purchase the PS6. We’re all junkies here. There is no outsider here to fool.
Its a much improved image, running at double the framerate of the base console. It's more than miniscule. It's not just running Fidelity mode at 60fps, it's improving it too.Seems like such a minuscule difference to me visually. 60fps in, presumably, most titles definitely seems like the biggest improvement imo.
Without a side-by-side I’d have told you this was just a standard Ps5 footage.
No? Did you read my message?Are you saying it's fine if PS5 Pro is obsolete in 3-4 years? I don't think Sony even thinks that.
What else am I supposed to take from it?No? Did you read my message?
I’m sure it is, this is more of a ‘me’ problem.Its a much improved image, running at double the framerate of the base console. It's more than miniscule. It's not just running Fidelity mode at 60fps, it's improving it too.
I just think you're wrong on that one point. The patch upped the game to 1440p60. The remaster then had that as the performance mode as well as a 4k30 mode.
That anyone in this forum that is buying the Pro is not the kind of customer that sees the release of the PS6 and says “naaaahhhh, I’ll better wait a few years and amortise the Pro acquisition”. We’ll buy it day one.What else am I supposed to take from it?
It does? where?Meh, GT7 still has pop in and bad aliasing. Fuck this shit.
It's the only barometer that matters on Gaf.
6:30min, yellow post on the left (bit with the Corvette).It does? where?