Jack and daxter and ratchet and clank are both the same to me.... Not in my collection.
Head bosses yes as surely they will lose a lot of sales for games that could have a ps4 version quite easily that won't be a system seller. Jack and daxter is one of them as ain't nobody spending 500 pounds to play that!
Yes to all those, but also give me Demon's Souls.I would be more impressed if they remade some older IP like Jet Moto, Syphon Filter or SOCOM. Another Souls game when we already have Elden Ring to look forward to? I don't get it.
Since the PS5 is backwards compatible with PS4, most people can simply sell or trade in their PS4/Pro towards a PS5 and keep all their games. It's a win all around. You don't have to play cross-gen games on your brand new PS5 and you got it cheaper since it could still play all your old games.
Side note: I hope the new Spiderman is shorter than the original. That game dragged on so bad I couldn't even finish the first DLC. I was sick of it by the end.
What if the digital is 399? And you can trade in against it?
Microsoft couldn't time out some next-gen games and everyone bought so hard into this idea that a new generation console doesn't come with new generation games. It's crazy how well PR works.Well that is what they always did for 4 generations.
Why people expected some weird change?
Be patient. Games will come. What was shown are games 3 or more years in development.I have every system and will have every system once the new generation comes out.
I have one of the best gaming setups money can buy so please it definitely isn't what you say.
In fact I've just turned on my ps4pro, 65 inch lg c9, denon av receiver that's powering my 7.2.4 sound setup to play the last of us 1 addon "left behind".
And that stuff is barely 30 percent of my gaming setup....
And I'm sure levels could be made that have pre set portals in them within the level or be able to stream/load whilst playing again not as good but enjoyable... Yes.
It was only ratchet and clank that had anything ssd related that is a next generation type thing.
I think it's because Demon's Souls was the first game that started this trend of SoulsBorne games that came after it.I would be more impressed if they remade some older IP like Jet Moto, Syphon Filter or SOCOM. Another Souls game when we already have Elden Ring to look forward to? I don't get it.
Ok lets break it down.Consoles are ideal for people and families in a weak economy. The entertainment derived from each dollar is incredible.
Damn, you're right. But I want my high-octane Jet Moto remake that plays like MotorStorm. Just thinking about such a game running on PS5 with the graphics of Gran Turismo 7 would get me so hyped.I think it's because Demon's Souls was the first game that started this trend of SoulsBorne games that came after it.
It developed a strong cult following and it's only exclusive to the PS3, but now just like Dark Souls, it will be available to play for a new generation of gamers.
I still have it on my ps3.I think it's because Demon's Souls was the first game that started this trend of SoulsBorne games that came after it.
It developed a strong cult following and it's only exclusive to the PS3, but now just like Dark Souls, it will be available to play for a new generation of gamers.
My ps4 is still well supported wirh 2 massive aaa blockbuster games on the way and my never ending backlog of ps4 games i yet have to touch.If you are fine with Sony's way of arbitrarily excluding games from PS4 to push PS5 console sales that's fine. Nothing that was shown Thursday couldn't be made to work on PS4, but it makes those who plan to purchase a PS5 "feel" good that the new Astro Bot can only be played on PS5.
Microsoft just wants to support their prior console for a few more years. There is no harm in that.
When will Spider Man be available on PS5? Is it day one? What if someone has PS4 discs but buys the PS5 Digital Edition because it's cheaper? Plus, will PS5 be backwards compatible with all the discs or is it just digital only? Some stuff, Sony simply hasn't made crystal clear. All they keep saying is that BC is progressing.
I loved Spider Man and all the DLC so I wouldn't mind 30-40 hours for Miles Morales. Just give me a great main story, some good side stories and cutout the crimes and collectibles.
Ratchet and Clank. Your argument is null.If you are fine with Sony's way of arbitrarily excluding games from PS4 to push PS5 console sales that's fine. Nothing that was shown Thursday couldn't be made to work on PS4, but it makes those who plan to purchase a PS5 "feel" good that the new Astro Bot can only be played on PS5.
Microsoft just wants to support their prior console for a few more years. There is no harm in that.
If you are fine with Sony's way of arbitrarily excluding games from PS4 to push PS5 console sales that's fine. Nothing that was shown Thursday couldn't be made to work on PS4, but it makes those who plan to purchase a PS5 "feel" good that the new Astro Bot can only be played on PS5.
Microsoft just wants to support their prior console for a few more years. There is no harm in that.
You sony guys like buying shit to many times. Its a mod for spiderman with reused assets. I wanted it to be reason enough but i think i will have to wait till spiderman 2.
Which is why I never actually believed it was an intentional decision; I interpret it as the game studios not able to make near launch, so MS decided to market it as being pro-consumer.This should be the default.
Releasing a new console and spending the first couple years making games that are still last-gen games is extremely disappointing. Hopefully, Xbox changes this ASAP. It is killing Series S/X hype.
You must have forgotten how good Ratchet and Clank looked on PS4. Go compare you are going to be surprised. Yes the teleporting to different areas is new, but those were linear levels not open world.Ratchet and Clank. Your argument is null.
Which is why I never actually believed it was an intentional decision; I interpret it as the game studios not able to make near launch, so MS decided to market it as being pro-consumer.
If MS wanted they could have promised cross gen 1st party games for 2 years or more. But they only promised one year from launch. Why so short a time? Too short to really make anyone happy. So to me it is just smokescreen to hide their ineptitude.
I am just surprised how well it worked. Almost everyone seemed to be fooled. I always make fun of MS marketing, but this time around I take my hat off for such a masterful lie.
Thats a fair staement. I have no problem with rachet and clank and that make sense for a nee game. Just so torn on the spiderman.![]()
Seriously though, us Sony guys aren't anything compared to EA. Releasing the same Madden NFL video games for years with very little changes.
Until Spiderman comes out for PS5 we can't really say how much new content it has.
As crazy as it sounds, i think this may be a very good idea. The PS4 userbase being as large as it is with a brand as big as Spider-Man's and a follow up to last year's blockbuster Spider-Man title, a follow up for both PS5 and PS4 will do record numbers i'm sure.That spiderman expansion should be on ps4
I mean bc should make this playable on ps5 if its a ps4 title. I didnt mean to derail thread.As crazy as it sounds, i think this may be a very good idea. The PS4 userbase being as large as it is with a brand as big as Spider-Man's and a follow up to last year's blockbuster Spider-Man title, a follow up for both PS5 and PS4 will do record numbers i'm sure.
That's because consoles, right now, are just "slimmed down" x86 PCs: no new architecture, no new CPU instruction set, no new way of storage (yes, SSDs are different, but the concept is the same).Microsoft couldn't time out some next-gen games and everyone bought so hard into this idea that a new generation console doesn't come with new generation games. It's crazy how well PR works.
Thanks for being a reasonable guy. Some people here are hard to reason with or are argumentive. I'm kinda torn on Spiderman as well. I'm hoping a true sequel comes sooner than later.Thats a fair staement. I have no problem with rachet and clank and that make sense for a nee game. Just so torn on the spiderman.
If MedEvil was able to get a remaster, then there could be hope for Jet Moro and other cult-favourites from the PlayStation lineup.Damn, you're right. But I want my high-octane Jet Moto remake that plays like MotorStorm. Just thinking about such a game running on PS5 with the graphics of Gran Turismo 7 would get me so hyped.
This should be the default.
Releasing a new console and spending the first couple years making games that are still last-gen games is extremely disappointing. Hopefully, Xbox changes this ASAP. It is killing Series S/X hype.
Did you get a chance to.see the in-game screenshots of Demon's Souls Remake?now im wondering if i should wait to play my first Souls game on PS5 when it comes out, or just go for it on PS4 now...
it looked fucking amazing in that trailer
Both Demon's Souls and Spiderman are system sellers, on PS4 they might sell more but being PS5 exclusive will help sell more consoles if both are launch titles
GTAV will see similar improvements... if you remember the cars appearing on the road a few hundred metres in front of you. There will be no such pop-in.
They can't run on last gen.... that's the point.I actually think its a bit messed up because I doubt any games coming out at launch is ground up built for next gen. A game like death-loop or spider-man which was built on the skeleton of games already out on current gen are fully capable of running on current gen, but won't be due to marketing. It's anti consumer to me because many people literally can't upgrade due to finances and won't be able to play certain games. If they game literally couldn't run on current gen thats one thing, but to intentionally just not put them out personally bothers me. I personally don't care that they will help Sony sell more PS5's at launch, thats not my concern as a consumer. I just want to play the games. It's like money hatting your own console.
Spiderman: Miles Morales technically can. It's the same f*cking engine and foundation!!! The only reason it's being thrown to PS5 is literally marketing. That's it.They can't run on last gen.... that's the point.
It would be an assumption to think they can't. I mean Halo infinite and Flight simulator can, but I have to assume Miles Morales can't? That's to big of a leap for me personally. I'm not feeling bad for last gen, also I''m buying both at launch so I won't be affected personally. But if you can launch a game for last gen but chose not too for marketing reasons, it makes sense business wise, but as a consumer it does bother me.They can't run on last gen.... that's the point.
Anyway, why feel sorry for last gen? We just got TLOU2 96 metacritic, Ghost of Tsushima is due next month and Cyberpunk and a load of 3rd party games like Watch Dogs Legion and AC Valhalla are due around winter.....
Why don't people get angry with Nintendo for doing the same?It would be an assumption to think they can't. I mean Halo infinite and Flight simulator can, but I have to assume Miles Morales can't? That's to big of a leap for me personally. I'm not feeling bad for last gen, also I''m buying both at launch so I won't be affected personally. But if you can launch a game for last gen but chose not too for marketing reasons, it makes sense business wise, but as a consumer it does bother me.
It is anti consumer when nintendo does it imo. If they said Zelda:BOTW isn't going to the wii u but is fully capable on running on it, thats messed up to me. If an old oled TV is capable of hdmi 2.1 via update but the company says nah thats also anti consumer. A lot is anti consumer but is good business so its about balance, but if you just take whatever a company throws at you at face value then we'd be screwed. Xbox is doing it because they did so much anti consumer moves early last gen they are making up for it almost a decade later. I'm sure they'd love to do the same if there were in a similar position to Sony.Why don't people get angry with Nintendo for doing the same?
It's also been done every generation till now....
But because Xbox decide to do something, suddenly PlayStation have to too? Please.....
It's not anti-consumer because the people who have not bought PS5 are not PS5 consumers.
I mean if I buy a new OLED TV with hdmi 2.1 etc, should everyone with an old TV get all those features?
Because they changed architecture, that's why. They changed the storage media, changed the CPU (from PowerPC to ARM), changed the form factor and even operating system (they now use FreeBSD).Why don't people get angry with Nintendo for doing the same?
And so what do people do when Ratchet goes into a portal and it takes 2 minutes to load instead of 2 seconds? They say 'F this crap game...it's broken' get a terrible experience and blame it all on Sony.....Because they changed architecture, that's why. They changed the storage media, changed the CPU (from PowerPC to ARM), changed the form factor and even operating system (they now use FreeBSD).
But before the Switch, all Nintendo disc-based consoles were pretty backwards compatible (either officially or unofficially). The Wii could read Gamecube discs. The Wii-U could read Wii discs and, if you modded it, also Gamecube ISOs. Same with the portable ones: gameboy color was BC with original Gameboy. Gameboy Advance was BC with all the previous ones. Nintendo DS was compatible with Gameboy Advance cartridges, 3DS with DS and DSi cartridges...
As i said in another thread, PS5 and XSX runs the same hardware AND software architecture (x86+Windows on Xbox, and x86+FreeBSD on PlayStation) so there's literally no excuse to not scale down the engines for cross-gen games.
If you are fine with Sony's way of arbitrarily excluding games from PS4 to push PS5 console sales that's fine. Nothing that was shown Thursday couldn't be made to work on PS4, but it makes those who plan to purchase a PS5 "feel" good that the new Astro Bot can only be played on PS5.
Microsoft just wants to support their prior console for a few more years. There is no harm in that.
Ratchet uses a different "skeleton" (although same engine), so it's justified its release exclusively on PS5, but Spider-man isn't. Spider-man is literally the same as GTA V: a previous-gen game that was ported to current-gen hardware, and both running at the same time.And so what do people do when Ratchet goes into a portal and it takes 2 minutes to load instead of 2 seconds? They say 'F this crap game...it's broken' get a terrible experience and blame it all on Sony.....
Or Spider-man, so Miles is swinging so fast, the city doesn't load in.... it looks like the game is broken.... what now?
Or the new CPU allows so many enemies and new huge enemies in mech's etc.... but in the old version they can't do that and so it's just a load of normal enemies... that takes a load of manpower to decide which enemies to put in there instead and it's technically a different experience. A far inferior experience....
Snow deformity and other details would also be lost and when people see advertising they see a completely different game.... resulting in a huge controversy.