JackMcGunns
Member
It’s worse than Redfall.
Damn Microsoft mismanaging their studios! This would never happen under Sony.
It’s worse than Redfall.
Such an underrated commentDude there is a billion dollar industry of cosmetic unlocks in FPS games, time to wake up and start paying attention. Of course it matters.
You don’t watch a superhero movie or pro wrestling to see a bunch of average looking, modestly dressed, relatable folks. You go to see these larger than life, impossibly attractive/fit, hyper-masculine/hyper-feminine freaks of nature engaged in a good vs evil drama.They could have gone with a combination, certainly. Then you cover all bases. That's how you make money. The minority of whining screamers they would have lost with sexier characters would have been more than offset by those more drawn to the game for its power fantasy elements.
Post those gifs when devs wonder why their game bombed and when devs post of "sudden" layoffs/studio clousure.
We are just giving feedback to failed terrible product, no1 is crying here, none from the players at least, game had 2300 concurent players over open beta durning weekend, we as players who care about gaming industry are happy, not sad
Nailed it.You don’t watch a superhero movie or pro wrestling to see a bunch of average looking, modestly dressed, relatable folks. You go to see these larger than life, impossibly attractive/fit, hyper-masculine/hyper-feminine freaks of nature engaged in a good vs evil drama.
Same thing with fighting games, hero shooters, and lots of other forms of entertainment, going all the way back to ancient myths and dramas.
And the people making all these crappy woke flops know that, and they hate it, and they want to “correct” it. But you can’t just take that timeless formula and be like “let’s have our postmodern feminists and diversity consultants ugly them up, take away all the sex appeal, and portray them in the most inoffensive and stereotype-defying way possible” and then expect the audience to buy it.
That ain’t gonna work. Just like no amount of shouting about how Lizzo is “sooooo beautiful” is going to make guys want to bone her, just because you think that’s what they ought to want.
Yeah I'm Irish white and I stand out like a sore thumb when around mainland Europeans.Just a minor remark: "whites" are not all the same, like blacks or Asians. I'm white but I could never be confused with a nordic or slavic white, not even a British one. It's ignorant beyond belief to put them all in the same bag.
So, "representation" is not only impossible but the perfect excuse for racist motherfuckers to impose their perverted view of the world and make a Greek queen like Cleopatra Afro-American in a Netflix "documentary", the dumbest thing I have ever seen.
So, these people can't bomb and get fired soon enough and their apologists or sympathizers may fuck off as well.
This is the most giga chad post of the year.Really happy to see this game fail. I hope the studio closes and the game gets cancelled before release. These people don't deserve to make games.
I just don't agreeThe developers will be open to constructive feedback about Concord, thing is why jump to the rescue for someone who just hopes the devs lose their jobs all because they made a game they don't like. To say you care about the gaming industry whilst endorsing someone hoping for industry job loses and studio closure of Firewalk is pure clown talk. I'd prefer the devs keep there jobs and you thoughtless people find a new hobby.
You've had that ready for a year didn't you?Damn Microsoft mismanaging their studios! This would never happen under Sony.
And he savoured every moment after posting it. As he should.You've had that ready for a year didn't you?
Go buy more concord copies then, bro, thats the only way that failed dev studio doesnt get lay offs/doesnt get closed, i dont wanna touch that woke gaas game with a stick evenThe developers will be open to constructive feedback about Concord, thing is why jump to the rescue for someone who just hopes the devs lose their jobs all because they made a game they don't like. To say you care about the gaming industry whilst endorsing someone hoping for industry job loses and studio closure of Firewalk is pure clown talk. I'd prefer the devs keep there jobs and you thoughtless people find a new hobby.
I realllly want to know how they fucked this one up so badly. How Sony apparently liked what they saw so much that they bought this studio. And how Firewalk spent 6 years and tens (if not hundreds) of millions making Concord a reality without realizing they were making a colossal turd that literally nobody wants to play.I just don't agree
If Devs are on payrolls for years working on a shooter with people who hates guns and their product is a colossal cluster fuck of a flop they don't deserve to be on a pay roll moving forward
How many games like this do you keep giving them before major changes and firings are made
These people made their beds now the professor can go flip burgers
Its all hyprocryzy with lizzo- try to compliment ur gf/wifey or even girl on first date- "damn u look just as good as lizzo"- she will take it as big insult literally- women know lizzo looks ugly af but they arent/cant be honestThat ain’t gonna work. Just like no amount of shouting about how Lizzo is “sooooo beautiful” is going to make guys want to bone her, just because you think that’s what they ought to want.
Do I appear sad?
Great questions because any type of internal play testing did not give proper feedback or it was ignoredI realllly want to know how they fucked this one up so badly. How Sony apparently liked what they saw so much that they bought this studio. And how Firewalk spent 6 years and tens (if not hundreds) of millions making Concord a reality without realizing they were making a colossal turd that literally nobody wants to play.
From almost the moment the trailer started, the audience reaction was overwhelmingly negative. Then when the gameplay footage was shown, the audience hated it even more. Gamers rejected it with every fiber of their being and refused to play it for free.
How could there have been such a massive disconnect between what Sony/Firewalk thought their audience wanted and what they actually want?
Ppl in power are in crazy woke bubble nowadays, those are rich mofos that try their hardest to be politically correct, those guys arent gamers, they are suits, who saw DEI smeared allover the studio and their game and thought in their closeted woke brains this is what normal sane ppl around the world think and wantI realllly want to know how they fucked this one up so badly. How Sony apparently liked what they saw so much that they bought this studio. And how Firewalk spent 6 years and tens (if not hundreds) of millions making Concord a reality without realizing they were making a colossal turd that literally nobody wants to play.
From almost the moment the trailer started, the audience reaction was overwhelmingly negative. Then when the gameplay footage was shown, the audience hated it even more. Gamers rejected it with every fiber of their being and refused to play it for free.
How could there have been such a massive disconnect between what Sony/Firewalk thought their audience wanted and what they actually want?
Meanwhile, on PS5, it was in the ~300th position on the charts, meaning it's not doing better there either.
Tbf arkane was making the best immersive sims in the business so seeing the downfall was more painful, nobody gives half a fuck about firewalk studios, they were an incognita more than a certified banger studio.Damn Microsoft mismanaging their studios! This would never happen under Sony.
Tbf arkane was making the best immersive sims in the business so seeing the downfall was more painful, nobody gives half a fuck about firewalk studios, they were an incognita more than a certified banger studio.
To sony?To be fair to who? Arkane is the only responsible here, especially if they had more experience. Covid was who they blamed.
Yeah when a woman says “OMG Lizzo is sooooo beautiful” what they really mean is “I have pity on women who look like her and I want them to feel better about themselves”. Like the way a patronizing adult would tell an ugly fat kid “you’re beautiful and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise, it’s what’s on the inside that counts.”Its all hyprocryzy with lizzo- try to compliment ur gf/wifey or even girl on first date- "damn u look just as good as lizzo"- she will take it as big insult literally- women know lizzo looks ugly af but they arent/cant be honest
Thank god i wasn't born in us, my mom and dad always fucked with me for being a ball of lard when i was little, sometimes hard words are better than make your son believe that weighting 125 kg at 16 years old is all ok and dandy.Yeah when a woman says “OMG Lizzo is sooooo beautiful” what they really mean is “I have pity on women who look like her and I want them to feel better about themselves”. Like the way a patronizing adult would tell an ugly fat kid “you’re beautiful and don’t let anyone tell you otherwise, it’s what’s on the inside that counts.”
Yeahhhh that’s a kind thing to say to a kid. But you would never talk that way to a person you respected and actually found attractive. Most grown ups (and many kids) are pretty good at detecting when you’re patronizing them and telling them white lies.
There's a billion dollar industry around basketball sneakers. The game of basketball isn't played because of Nike.Dude there is a billion dollar industry of cosmetic unlocks in FPS games, time to wake up and start paying attention. Of course it matters.
And a vast majority of people will buy sneakers that look pretty coolThere's a billion dollar industry around basketball sneakers. The game of basketball isn't played because of Nike.
well, maybe that's not the best comparison...There's a billion dollar industry around basketball sneakers. The game of basketball isn't played because of Nike.
And a vast majority of people will buy sneakers that look pretty cool
I don't care how comfy they were I would never wear pink bunny ear slippers, not in public anyhow
And I am in the camp that being "woke" is just one of a long list of problems for ConcordTrue, but the sneakers come AFTER the game.
We like playing basketball THEN we buy the cool looking sneakers.
Multiplayer is no different. We buy skins AFTER we realize we want to hunker down with a game.
We learn chess on a crappy board. We fall in love with chess THEN we buy a $200 dollar board the looks cool.
People are simply sick of it now.Amazes me how much the character design seems to have sway over people take that this game will flop ...umm ...so it's a FPS for starters , and 90% of the time you shooting at the thjngs you have issus with .... umm .... win?
You'd think the maps, game mechanics, UI design, gun play, would be higher on the list of things that make or break a game ...but no,instead we see YouTube videos with "woke trash!" Or "why isn't this free!" In the title.
Pretty sure places like digital foundry etc hated on hell divers 2 out of the gate as well based on knee jerk reactions to what people think a game should or shouldn't be. At the end of the day it comes down to gameplay ..will see how things go. But as of right now I've been playing this non stop, even when I have CF25 and burning shores to finish yet.
well, maybe that's not the best comparison...
A lot of people won't play a game because the characters are unappealing and they can't play dress-up with them. That's just a fact. There is a reason why Nicki Minaj was put into COD and made huge news. And Modern Warfare 2 sucked. Even if Concord had the best gameplay, and it doesn't, the fact that nobody actually wants to play as these characters is a huge reason why the game had such miserable numbers when it was open beta.
Damn, can I move to where you live? Land whales are the norm where I live.In the real world I see strikingly beautiful people every single day. So how about leaving something of that within the gaming universe as well? Doesn’t matter if it’s alien characters. Have a couple different Liaras and Thors in there. Diversity remember? It’s really not that complicated to get some positive buzz. Right now there is nothing in there to pull you in on this new IP, except gameplay, which doesn’t seem to be much different from what’s already out there. So yeah, good luck then!
If you don’t think that, say, Overwatch’s initial character roster played a huge part in the game’s initial success and marketing then you aren’t paying attention. And part of the reason why Fortnite is still generating gazillions of dollars today is because it has every character under the sun and each character is like a new ad for the game.How would we test this?
Fortnite Battle Royale got criticized for looking like a basic, cartoony, kids game back in 2017. It forced players to use generic default skins initially. It took off like a rocket because multiplayer gamers value different things that single player gamers.
Gigantic has some of the best multiplayer character designs I've seen. Game came out of the gate screeching to a halt because multiplayer gamers value something else. Character designs are shallow and don't really impact your enjoyment of a game.
That's over embellished by people who don't understand multiplayer.If you don’t think that, say, Overwatch’s initial character roster played a huge part in the game’s initial success and marketing then you aren’t paying attention. And part of the reason why Fortnite is still generating gazillions of dollars today is because it has every character under the sun and each character is like a new ad for the game.
Having appealing character designs and roster is absolutely a necessary but not sufficient requirement for success in this space.
One positive about this, is that it sends a clear message to Sony about how people feel about Woke.
MAG was amazing though.
Plus, for me anyhow before building became insane the early Fortnite BR was actually kind of fun to playIf you don’t think that, say, Overwatch’s initial character roster played a huge part in the game’s initial success and marketing then you aren’t paying attention. And part of the reason why Fortnite is still generating gazillions of dollars today is because it has every character under the sun and each character is like a new ad for the game.
Having appealing character designs and roster is absolutely a necessary but not sufficient requirement for success in this space.
Rust isn’t a hero shooter.That's over embellished by people who don't understand multiplayer.
Overwatch became a huge hit because it felt fresh in 2016. It's only primary competition was Team Fortress on PC. Once it became a success, people misattribute characteristics as to why it became a success.
Here's the base character model for one of the most successful multiplayer games of today (Rust). This is how everyone starts out playing...
Nobody that plays Rust thinks the game would do any better with "cooler" character models. Multiplayer gamers value gameplay over shallow stuff like that. Concords characters, comparatively, look light years better. Nobody cares.
Its manly af buff dude, change it to concord's prefered fat lesbian and see how community reactsThat's over embellished by people who don't understand multiplayer.
Overwatch became a huge hit because it felt fresh in 2016. It's only primary competition was Team Fortress on PC. Once it became a success, people misattribute characteristics as to why it became a success.
Here's the base character model for one of the most successful multiplayer games of today (Rust). This is how everyone starts out playing...
Nobody that plays Rust thinks the game would do any better with "cooler" character models. Multiplayer gamers value gameplay over shallow stuff like that. Concords characters, comparatively, look light years better. Nobody cares.
If you think character design appeal doesn't matter when it comes to a game's success then man, I don't know what to say.That's over embellished by people who don't understand multiplayer.
Overwatch became a huge hit because it felt fresh in 2016. It's only primary competition was Team Fortress on PC. Once it became a success, people misattribute characteristics as to why it became a success.
Here's the base character model for one of the most successful multiplayer games of today (Rust). This is how everyone starts out playing...
Nobody that plays Rust thinks the game would do any better with "cooler" character models. Multiplayer gamers value gameplay over shallow stuff like that. Concords characters, comparatively, look light years better. Nobody cares.
Aren't gacha games mostly SP titles? Or at least PvE titles? Again, that type of gamer requires a higher quality of character design than a multiplayer gamer.If you think character design appeal doesn't matter when it comes to a game's success then man, I don't know what to say.
Just check any gacha game that's full of waifus like the recent ZZZ. That game passed 50 million downloads on it's very first few days.
It doesn't matter. Gigantic is a hero shooter with phenomenal character design. No one cares.Rust isn’t a hero shooter.
The character design still look pretty in line with modern times unfortunately.It's just bad (but not unlucky) timing.
They greenlit this garbage at the height of the woke, Superhero, and GaaS bubbles, and it feels like a product of a different era now.
Good. Serves them right for chasing that shit so hard back then and failing to invest properly in the quality AAA single player games they rebuilt their reputation on last gen.
why are you bringing up Rust? Every multiplayer game is different. People go into a survival game expecting different things from a character-focused shooter. For a character focused shooter, people want appealing characters. This isn't hard.That's over embellished by people who don't understand multiplayer.
Overwatch became a huge hit because it felt fresh in 2016. It's only primary competition was Team Fortress on PC. Once it became a success, people misattribute characteristics as to why it became a success.
Here's the base character model for one of the most successful multiplayer games of today (Rust). This is how everyone starts out playing...
Nobody that plays Rust thinks the game would do any better with "cooler" character models. Multiplayer gamers value gameplay over shallow stuff like that. Concords characters, comparatively, look light years better. Nobody cares.
why?that type of gamer requires a higher quality of character design than a multiplayer gamer.
It does matter. Of course it matters lol. People have different expectations from a zany Marvel-style hero shooter vs a realistically styled survival game. I can’t believe this point even needs to be argued.It doesn't matter. Gigantic is a hero shooter with phenomenal character design. No one cares.