Captain Tuttle
Member
True or not this is going to be these peoples story going forwardThat the militia guy was murdered and had his hands up
Even if dash cam footage comes out proving otherwise
True or not this is going to be these peoples story going forwardThat the militia guy was murdered and had his hands up
It's not presumptuous. It's apparent in your posts. If you had even the slightest knowledge of it, you would have acknowledged that that's what was being described, then launched into your criticism (either thinking it wouldn't apply to that situation or calling the rule unjust). Instead, you acted baffled that that first poster believed his hypothetical could result in a murder charge (indicated by you beginning with "..."), told him that isn't how murder works, then gave another poster a "lesson" in the distinction between murder and manslaughter.
Your explanation about why you chose to ignore the rule makes absolutely no sense. Apparently, if you believe something is unjust, you choose to ignore it, and inform people they are wrong when they describe it to you. That's an interesting way of interacting with people.
Yep the footage will be as fake as the moon landingTrue or not this is going to be these peoples story going forward
Even if dash cam footage comes out proving otherwise
When considering that the deceased was a perpetrator, no I didn't think felony murder was applicable in the situation. Sorry, I was wrong.
I'm sorry? Either way, this doesn't qualify as felony murder given the predicates in Oregon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_murder_rule_(Oregon)Uh huh.
Hey, look at the bright side. This proves racism is dead, right?EDIT: Jesus, the comments on these articles. People actively encouraging the government to massacre people.
Took over a government facility and demanded to release of two criminals
Destroyed government property
Threatened violence against law enforcement
Brought children to serve as human shields.
I see. Doesn't seem likely that is the case.
Feds are not your run of the mill cop?Given the past two years of law enforcement is it so hard to believe the feds shot first?
Given the past two years of law enforcement is it so hard to believe the feds shot first?
Given the past two years of law enforcement is it so hard to believe the feds shot first?
These occupiers apparently forgot about the occupying part
Great, they have a martyr. Just as planned I guess.
I'm sorry? Either way, this doesn't qualify as felony murder given the predicates in Oregon: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felony_murder_rule_(Oregon)
Something going down on the stream right now.
Oregon law in this case does not matter as they were arrested on federal charges.
arson
•escape
•murder
•kidnapping
•treason
•espionage
•sabotage
•sexual abuse
•child abuse
•burglary, and
•robbery.
(18 U.S.C. § 1111(a).)
Jeez, what's up with the skewed distribution of federal lands anyway?
We got halfway across the country before anyone thought that maybe we shouldn't piss all our resources away.
Given the past two years of law enforcement is it so hard to believe the feds shot first?
At the federal wildlife refuge, protester Jason Patrick told NBC News that the remaining supporters were discussing if and how the occupation might end.
"Right now … I'm talking to other leadership. It's just Americans that are defending the constitution that's what it looks like," he said.
"Peaceful resolution is what you keep hearing and a peaceful resolution is what we expect," he added.
Four carloads of occupiers left early Wednesday, and Patrick said children at the scene had gone. Meanwhile, police and FBI officers established a series of checkpoints along key routes leading to the site.
That the militia guy was murdered and had his hands up
How does a person with very controversial public views like this have any foster kids, let alone eleven. What public child welfare worker vetted this guy and gave the all clear for foster children to live there? As a parent who had to jump through a lot of legal hoops and red tape to adopt a single child, this boggles the mind.Of course. But my understanding is that this was literally in the middle-of-nowhere. A bunch of empty buildings where men were role playing freedom fighters. I don't want to make any excuses for these sovereign citizen types but these farmers didn't seem to pose any immediate threat to anyone.
I suppose something had to be done after officers retreated in the previous Bundy standoff. Hopefully it wasn't the FBI that started the shooting, because you don't want to create martyrs. Or who knows, maybe he had a death wish.
Edit : Apparently the guy had 11 foster kids as well. What a mess.
True or not this is going to be these peoples story going forward
Even if dash cam footage comes out proving otherwise
Wow, apparently they're around 150 FBI vehicles at the refuge. These guys ain't fucking around!
Wow, apparently they're around 150 FBI vehicles at the refuge. These guys ain't fucking around!
I have a feeling these guys are gonna matyr themselves and blow themselves up.
Hopefully I'm wrong.
Why can't they just cut the electricity and water, then apply riot control measures such as sound cannons etc to confuse them and eventually just have them walk out. It should not be that difficult to isolate people properly and then just wait it out.
It feels like the American police/FBI only has two states. You either back down completely or just have a shootout.
I have a feeling these guys are gonna matyr themselves and blow themselves up.
Hopefully I'm wrong.
Riot control on heavily armed dudes?
That's suicide.
Let's not forget who escalated this issue--the militia.
Why can't they just cut the electricity and water, then apply riot control measures such as sound cannons etc to confuse them and eventually just have them walk out. It should not be that difficult to isolate people properly and then just wait it out.
It feels like the American police/FBI only has two states. You either back down completely or just have a shootout.
What do they have? A bunch of rifles against armored vehicles and officers in full gear?
What do they have? A bunch of rifles against armored vehicles and officers in full gear?
It seems Tarpman was actually killed by police officers and not FBI agents. Conservatives might have a problem with this one as they hold the former in higher regard than the latter.
im thinking roadside arrest was probably the best way to get this done. If the power was cut they would have hunkered down. If sonic weapons or riot control was deployed they would have fired from their position. These arent protesters. These are armed militia looking for a firefight. Confronting them in their defensible position sounds like the worst way to go about it if you dont want casualties. If casualties are acceptable a drone strike would have been the best method.
Gotta love how so many people on the internet readily believe the "Fed shot first"/"Fed shot an unarmed man" without "waiting for more information" when these same people are so quick to dismiss that same thing time and time again when it comes to black Americans interaction with local LEO.
Oh America.
What do they have? A bunch of rifles against armored vehicles and officers in full gear? What I mean by riot control measures is that you can just use sound cannons and other equipment so that they can't sleep properly etc.
That is a valid point.
I just assumed that they would cut water and electricity and eventually these militia members would grow tired and go back to their homes. And at that point arresting them one by one would be much easier.