dragonelite
Member
16 cores with half a thread on every core so 8 cores effectively.

16 cores with half a thread on every core so 8 cores effectively.
PS3 is considerably more powerful than 360, with an 8-core custom IBM Cell CPU. In the PS3, one core is locked out to improve manufacturing yields, and another is reserved for the operating system, but that still leaves PS3 with double the 360's processing power on paper.
I will never pay for a console over 250 dollars, mark my word. It sounds like Microsoft and Sony do not care if these consoles launch at 500 dollars and up, ridiculous.
Actually, it's 1280x704. So it is sub-hd.The article is wrong about Battlefield 3 being sub-HD on 360. It's still 1280x720. Thin black horizontal lines were added to the top and bottom, so the image displayed is still 720p. Heck, a majority of Blu-ray movies aren't 1080p then since 2.35:1/2.4:1 adds huge black bars.![]()
I will never pay for a console over 250 dollars, mark my word. It sounds like Microsoft and Sony do not care if these consoles launch at 500 dollars and up, ridiculous.
I will never pay for a console over 250 dollars, mark my word. It sounds like Microsoft and Sony do not care if these consoles launch at 500 dollars and up, ridiculous.
I dispute this, its still a nice bit of silicon, i don't see many complaining about the 360's processing chops.
Why are we talking about how many cores this kluge has when we should be talking about how the article mentions possible Durango games being shown at E3?
Fuck, I would kill to see MS show (even in a tech demo) next-gen.
lol this article directly compared the SPU + PPU count to the core count in the 360, and said that means the PS3's CPU is twice as powerful.
Why are we talking about how many cores this kluge has when we should be talking about how the article mentions possible Durango games being shown at E3?
Fuck, I would kill to see MS show (even in a tech demo) next-gen.
Allow me to spoil MS's lineup: Halo Durango, Forza Durango, Fable Durango, and Kinect Sports 3 Durango.
I second this. Some mention of the next gen by either Sony or MS would make this a much better E3 in my mind. This gen is old...bring on the next one!
Allow me to spoil MS's lineup: Halo Durango, Forza Durango, Fable Durango, and Kinect Sports 3 Durango.
Allow me to spoil MS's lineup: Halo Durango, Forza Durango, Fable Durango, and Kinect Sports 3 Durango.
:lolI guess you forgot the dancing app, Durango Tango.
16 cores with half a thread on every core so 8 cores effectively.
I'm kinda over the whole Kinect gimmick. I wish they would just shelve Kinect 2.
How can you have half a thread? You can't take an atomic operation and break it down into two halves.
Or rather, did you mean to say 8 physical cores with 16 threads?
It was a joke.
It was half a joke.
I'm almost certain it won't have 16 cores. It may well have 16 threads though.
I still cannot see MS or Sony letting Nintendo just run away with a next gen console this E3. I think it forces their hand a little. They may not see Nintendo as a threat to their core, but thats exactly what Nintendo seems to be going for this upcoming gen. I think they might be finally catching on to this and will plan a last minute, next gen console announcement of some sort.
Is the new PS4 really supposed to have double the processing power? :/
I guess that is how I am feeling too. Not that they exactly have to release every detail, but I feel like they have to do something.I can't see E3 going by without some kind of tease or mention from both Microsoft and Sony. I can see sony doing an E3 2005 and unveiling the consoles name and design completely out of the blue accompanied with tech demos. At the very least Microsoft will start of some kind of viral marketing campaign for their next console. Maybe microsoft show off future titles that are quite clearly for the next generation, but they don't specifically state it.
If E3 does go by without an announcement from MS or SONY, there's no way we won't have some official word on their plans by the time the Wii U launches, it would just be a really bad strategic move to keep quiet.
Only if Sony fans' wildest fantasies come true. These things are so far away that this talk is all over the place.
I can see a $399 price point for both PS4 and Durango, but I see XBL and PS+ going to $100/year easily.
i dont believe orbis will be more powerful than durango, nor in a 16 core cpu. i'm inclined to not believe this rumor source.