Lunatic_Gamer
Member
Last edited:
160W sounds low, but it is rumoured to be using chiplets which could be the reason why.![]()
160 bit memory bus and that 160W TDP...
Sony is NOT compromising performance next generation.
So, which one is it?160 W
160W sounds low, but it is rumoured to be using chiplets which could be the reason why.
Chiplets does not reduce power draw.160W sounds low, but it is rumoured to be using chiplets which could be the reason why.
399 for sure
PS5 was 200W on a monolithic design.7900XTX is chiplet as well and it draws a lot of power. GPU seems reasonable with that amount of cores but low TDP will throttle it...
He is talking about 9070 to 5080 level of power for raster and 5090 level of power for RT. This doesn't make any fucking sense...
Well by 2027 if things continue like this, im betting sony would have to pay me to buy a ps6 ... so cheaper than the ps5 is an understatementI bet it will be cheaper than PS5.
Yes it does.Chiplets does not reduce power draw.
Optimized Performance and Power: Chiplets can be optimized for their specific functions and technologies, improving the SoC's performance and power efficiency. Chiplets can also be placed closer together, reducing the interconnects' latency and power consumption.
PS5 was 200W on a monolithic design.
A decrease from that makes sense given the change to chiplets.
No they don't. Not compared to an all-in-one die solution.Yes it does.
I don't know, just stating it will impact power requirements, no idea on the degree of impact. I suspect they know what they're doing though and wouldn't go all out everywhere else if it led nowhere.Jump in clocks 2GHz to 3GHz for GPU and CPU will be over 4GHz for sure (5 maybe?) from 3.5GHz. 36CUs on PS5 - > 52/54CUs on PS6
Even with lower node I doubt this thing will eat less power than PS5.
These specs look super weird and memory speed is low, PS5 Pro is already memory speed limited and this jump to 640GB/s is small...
All hardware leaks have come from him.Obligatory post for anything MLID related.
![]()
I can post more links proving you're wrong if you don't like the one I previously sent you.No they don't. Not compared to an all-in-one die solution.
Also this.It's very difficult to get excited about specs, when Sony will still have cross-gen games for the majority of its lifespan, rendering these specs useless.
The specs he's agreed with, just some of the takes he doesn't.
Well I was going to reveal Canis at some point but MLID beat me to it
PS5 graphically was ~ 8x faster than PS4
Magnus is 25% - on paper
But who wants consistency in units used when sharing data?Magnus is 1.25x faster - on paper
That's pointless since [a situation where a chiplet design allows for] a power reduction require a context that doesn't apply here.I can post more links proving you're wrong if you don't like the one I previously sent you.
PS6 is going to be a like a 5090 with 40 gb ram?
Can anyone extrapolate the increase in RT needed for 9070 XT to match 5090 in performance?
The specs he's agreed with, just some of the takes he doesn't.
Eg.
Those GPUs aren't running a 3nm processor which would have decreased the TDP7900XTX is chiplet as well and it draws a lot of power. GPU seems reasonable with that amount of cores but low TDP will throttle it...
He is talking about 9070 to 5080 level of power for raster and 5090 level of power for RT. This doesn't make any fucking sense...
We don't know if it's speculation or not.And he's speculating here
He never got anywhere close any AMD ray tracing performance speculations. He could be looking at some ray intersection metric and be extrapolating to his usual « Nvidia killer » like it happened with RDNA 2.
The guy can only copy paste information directly given to him. Then he inflates expectations and the cycle of AMD starts anew. Disappointed to follow.
Can anyone extrapolate the increase in RT needed for 9070 XT to match 5090 in performance?
Considering the machine is still ways off, it can be nothing but speculation.We don't know if it's speculation or not.
It could be something handed to him in the form of, aiming for X.Considering the machine is still ways off, it can be nothing but speculation.
A 5080 with a fuckton of VRAM seems like. Not bad, and I imagine these will seem like great numbers if the RTX 6000 series (Vera Rubin) disappoints also.Can anyone extrapolate the increase in RT needed for 9070 XT to match 5090 in performance?
If these leaks are true, by the time the PS6 releases it'll be roughly around the performance level of an Nvidia or AMD 60 series card, so lower mid range cards in the 300 to 400 USD/EUR range. I don't think they'll manage to release the whole box for less than that, so if you're on PC already you can just slap a new card into your machine and pay less.It's gonna be priced less than my PC. Expensive but still less than my PC.![]()