AFAIK all GNM stuff is under NDA. I.e. imminent lawsuit afterwards.
It's on a throwaway with no identifiable information, and the leak itself would be enough anyways. But I'll take that as fair, which leaker has produced
any evidence that they are who they say they are, and said something anyone into hardware couldn't have made sound plausible?
The SSD stuff sounds cool, but any of us reading the last few pages here could have wrote a post that sounded as plausible as that. I'm not saying if it's true or not, I'm just looking for a higher standard of confirmation somehow.
Playing along though: The HBCC name drop is curious.
In a nutshell, HBCC is, as its “high-bandwidth cache controller” name gives away, a complement to the framebuffer (or “high-bandwidth cache” as AMD now calls it) that will treat the VRAM as a last-level cache, and some system memory as VRAM. If a resource is requested by the GPU, but it’s not currently in video memory, the memory pages relating to the data will be pulled in to Vega’s HBC (framebuffer) for quicker access, while unused pages will be flushed out.
HBCC 1) Treats VRAM as a last level cache
2) Dips into system RAM as VRAM
What this has to do with the custom SSD is curious. I could imagine something like SSG, a large solid state drive directly on the GPU/APU, but this is an additional technology than HBCC, though enabled by it.
If we get SSG in a console...I even more wish for Other OS support again lol, getting that in a consumer friendly cost would be kind of crazy compared to what SSGs go for (just $6,999 or so)
AMD says the SSG portion of the card can read data at up to 8GB/s and write data at up to 6GB/s off the NAND, already in excess of both PCI-E 3 and 4 limits