• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sethbacca

Member
Has anyone established if there is any benefit at all to getting the PS5 version of games like AC Valhalla and Immortals Fenyx Rising instead of the less expensive ps4 version with the free upgrade? Looks like bonuses and shit are all the same....
 

Md Ray

Member
Has this been posted?
EjlGW0HXcAAHs8H

EjlGW0EWAAoT8Sn

EjlGW0FXYAYxM0Q

EjlGW0pXcAg5q1v




Is this real or fake?
 
Last edited:

sircaw

Banned
My comment was directed entirely at the guy on Twitter, not the gaf member here who posted the tweet. I can see how my comment might've suggested that but that wasn't my intent.


You leave x-fighter alone, he's had a rough couple of days, i will not anyone remind him or pile more pain on him. "lollipop_disappointed:
 

SlimySnake

Flashless at the Golden Globes
No no no. He was saying this. He didn't say comparable in RT. He said competitive to the PS5 GPU in games

Screenshot-2020-10-04-092738.png
You guys rag on me for spreading fud, but this is actual FUD right here. this is utter fucking nonsense.

relative-performance_3840-2160.png


the 2060 super is less powerful than the 2070 which is equivalent to the 5700xt. hes basically peddling the 9 tflops nonsense and getting away with it because no one wants to ban industry people on era.

If he's been told from devs that its equivalent to the 2060 super then i would understand but he doesnt mention that here.

i knew something was off when he used the 2060 super instead of 2070 which is equivalent to a 9.3 tflops 5700xt with ingame clocks. he is trying to make the ps5 gpu look worse than it is.

ignore him. unless cerny was lying, the ps5 10.3 tflops gpu should be equivalent to a 2070 super.
 
Last edited:

Bo_Hazem

Banned
Last edited:
You guys rag on me for spreading fud, but this is actual FUD right here. this is utter fucking nonsense.

relative-performance_3840-2160.png


the 2060 super is less powerful than the 2070 which is equivalent to the 5700xt. hes basically peddling the 9 tflops nonsense and getting away with it because no one wants to ban industry people on era.

If he's been told from devs that its equivalent to the 2060 super then i would understand but he doesnt mention that here.

i knew something was off when he used the 2060 super instead of 2070 which is equivalent to a 9.3 tflops 5700xt with ingame clocks. he is trying to make the ps5 gpu look worse than it is.

ignore him. unless cerny was lying, the ps5 10.3 tflops gpu should be equivalent to a 2070 super.

Yes I noticed this too. I broke it down here

I figured it out. They still believe that Richard's RDNA1 tests of overclocking a 5700 in comparison to a stock 5700XT are relevant when it comes to RDNA2. What Richard did was see how close a 5700 could get to a higher CU 5700XT and it fell short but that's due to the limitations of the architecture at higher clock speeds. This didn't stop Richard though.

Another theory of mine is that they still believe PS5 to be 9TF. 5700 is a 7.9TF GPU (2060 class) and 5700XT is a 9.7TF GPU (2070 class). From what Alex is saying he thinks PS5 falls somewhere in between that which would land it conveniently around the 9TF mark which would be roughly a 2060S.

 

Dabaus

Banned
Let me guess.... Series X is comparable to RTX 3080 TI to be launched yet, no?

All the bias and money in the world cant change the fact that xbox is still loser tier. The Bethesda purchase was the only good move theyve made in 10 years and even then i guarantee all those games will end up on ps5 one way or the other. The fact Phil has been asked numerous times if theyll make it to ps5 and he never once said "No" should tell you all there is to know.
 

Nickolaidas

Member
There is a difference between crunch for the final few weeks of a project vs a year long crunch which has been pretty standard in this industry. Yes, i have worked weekends and put in 16 hour days at work but if i did that for months, let alone a full year I would be burned out and probably hospitalized. some month long crunch have been detrimental to my health. not mental health, health. i actually saw a colleague hospitalized in the middle of a crunch period. If we had gone a few more weeks, I wouldve been next.

and again, this is just for a month or 6 weeks max. we were promised bonuses but they didnt matter. it was not worth it.

Jason is right to call out cd project for going back on their no crunch pledge. doesnt matter if its for weeks or months or if they are getting overtime. if journalists dont report on this, then who will.
As someone who recently stopped working for 12 hours in the warehouse of the company I'm working for, loading boxes and packages for shipping to our customers (despite actually working as a graphic artist in a desk job for the rest of the year) for 6 days a week for one month, I fully, FULLY agree with your point. The exhaustion I went through and basically not living for an entire month just so that I would get +300 euros in my paycheck simply. Wasn't. Worth it.

But, yeah, I get it - it's school season, the boss needed some of the employees to help the employees of the warehouse who were understaffed since their workload is increased by 2000% (yes, two thousand percent) for the month of September.

But if I had to work like this for the ENTIRE year, I would go insane.
 

sircaw

Banned
All the bias and money in the world cant change the fact that xbox is still loser tier. The Bethesda purchase was the only good move theyve made in 10 years and even then i guarantee all those games will end up on ps5 one way or the other. The fact Phil has been asked numerous times if theyll make it to ps5 and he never once said "No" should tell you all there is to know.

If you ever have children, god help one of them if your wife names it Craig. :messenger_grinning:
 

ethomaz

Banned
All the bias and money in the world cant change the fact that xbox is still loser tier. The Bethesda purchase was the only good move theyve made in 10 years and even then i guarantee all those games will end up on ps5 one way or the other. The fact Phil has been asked numerous times if theyll make it to ps5 and he never once said "No" should tell you all there is to know.
I don't want Bethesda games on PS5... it is a loser move
Exclusives are good for the industry so I expect the games that did not have a contract in progress to be Xbox console exclusive.
 

Dabaus

Banned
I don't want Bethesda games on PS5... it is a loser move
Exclusives are good for the industry so I expect the games that did not have a contract in progress to be Xbox console exclusive.

Theyll be on ps5. There may be a timed xbox exclusive here and there but theyll come over eventually. So will halo infinite, give it time. I bet halo infinite will be on as many platforms as possible when its all said and done. Same with the bethesda games.
 
D

Deleted member 775630

Unconfirmed Member
All of them are bad examples, better have something offline as you're streaming from the server and some internally. Many thing affect it.
Yeah but you don't really have anything substantial to share really... It's still impressive how quickly it loads. I've seen similar videos come by for Far Cry, was also blazingly fast.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom