Damn, can't believe this rdna2 stuff is back.
Youd think after bragging then losing in real world performance these low iq twitter fanboys would realise.
Their argument is one of the dumbest I've seen for a while.
Firstly if were being silly and Classifying rdna 2 as having the same as desktop then it cant be as no infinity cache.
Of course they fluff their way past that conundrum.
But lets imagine this the other way round, seing as they are classifying Microsoft features as rdna 2 like sfs and direct x ray tracing and vrs.
So let's say if rdna 2 used Sony ray tracing, vrss (variable rate Sony shading) and so on.
Would fanboys brag... 'haha we have full rdna2 (sonydna2) you don't have it'
Microsoft and fans would say well of course we don't they are Sony implementation, we have our own versions.
What a ridiculous argument.
Why would Sony use a Microsoft implementation or name for something.
All this as well with spec wars seemingly trumping real world performance, so dumb.
All this happening is like 2 cars and one owner of a 2ltr car is laughing at the other who has a 1.8ltr.
My engine is bigger than yours and has full cardna2 hahaha.
Yet on the track the 1.8 beats the bigger engine car in real results, but yep let's keep bragging about specs that clearly mean so much you cant beat a 'less powerful car.'