LordOcidax
Member
Not talking about you… But don’t fool yourself, the majority of people download ilegal Roms.I said i already bought these games.... What are you on about?
Not talking about you… But don’t fool yourself, the majority of people download ilegal Roms.I said i already bought these games.... What are you on about?
I still don't see how attacking emulation as a whole justifies this.
Attack rom pirating sites and people downloading roms. Attacking emulation makes no sense.
And I think it’s fine to go after those people.Let's not pretend that the vast majority of people aren't using emulators to pirate/get games for free, there are dozens of easily accessible websites to download ROMS and ISOs and the ones who Nintendo are going after are dumbasses who flaunt it and try to make money out of it.
So? They should go after them then. Go after people downloading illegal roms. Go after the sites hosting them.Not talking about you… But don’t fool yourself, the majority of people download ilegal Roms.
Don't victim blame.... #itsametooDon't get me wrong, I love switch, but that is their fault for going with an Nvidia Android tablet instead of a more, lets say, customized design. Complexity also doubles as a copy protection mechanism.
Let's not pretend that the vast majority of gamers that do pirate games don't give a fuck about buying games and would happily buy a switch and jailbroke it in order to still play for free. The mere existence of an emulator isn't hurting Nintendo, it just, aside of piracy, enables the buyers to have a better than native experience.Let's not pretend that the vast majority of people aren't using emulators to pirate/get games for free, there are dozens of easily accessible websites to download ROMS and ISOs and the ones who Nintendo are going after are dumbasses who flaunt it and try to make money out of it.
My fault, please don't cancel me, I'm not a nazi.Don't victim blame.... #itsametoo
That’s the problem, they always find a link between the emulators creator and roms sites or a code under copyright in the emulator. Thats way Nintendo lawyers are so efficient.So? They should go after them then. Go after people downloading illegal roms. Go after the sites hosting them.
Because “Nintendos gotta Nintendo” is how they act. Petty. Which is a bummerI still don't see how attacking emulation as a whole justifies this.
Attack rom pirating sites and people downloading roms. Attacking emulation makes no sense.
Don't victim blame.... #itsametoo
When did that happened?code under copyright in the emulator
If an emulator is using copyrighted code, that particular emulator is illegal. Sure, go after it.That’s the problem, they always find a link between the emulators creator and roms sites or a code under copyright in the emulator. Thats way Nintendo lawyers are so efficient.
If i remember correctly, with the Dolphin. Could be wrong.When did that happened?
If the emulator creator doesn’t mess with ilegal roms or Copyrighted code, Nintendo doesn’t have a case, look at Analogue (Own hardware and plays Nintendo games). If Nintendo press the trigger is almost secured they have a case. Like i said before, Nintendo legal department are going to do their jobs if they find something.If an emulator is using copyrighted code, that particular emulator is illegal. Sure, go after it.
That still doesn't make emulation as a whole illegal. Emulators normally/traditionally don't have such code in them.
OP suggests Nintendo deems emulation, as a whole, illegal. Not just a particular emulator, not just a particular author, pirate, etc. The whole thing.
That's why they are scum.
So then, OP is wrong about Nintendo going after emulation?If the emulator creator doesn’t mess with ilegal roms or Copyrighted code, Nintendo doesn’t have a case, look at Analogue (Own hardware and plays Nintendo games). If Nintendo press the trigger is almost secured they have a case. Like i said before, Nintendo legal department are going to do their jobs if they find something.
If the emulator creator doesn’t mess with ilegal roms or Copyrighted code, Nintendo doesn’t have a case, look at Analogue (Own hardware and plays Nintendo games). If Nintendo press the trigger is almost secured they have a case. Like i said before, Nintendo legal department are going to do their jobs if they find something.
So you remember it wrong. Dolphin never did that, they do include, to this day, the encryption keys from wii, although they're not used, the dumping tool already decripts the images. They were accused by Nintendo when tried to launch on Steam on the basis of DMCA anti-circumvention provisions.If i remember correctly, with the Dolphin. Could be wrong.
If they made a Switch clone, you better believe they would sue Analogue.look at Analogue (Own hardware and plays Nintendo games)
If they go after you, is almost secure they have a case. Don’t blame Nintendo in that case, blame the emulator creator. Simple.So then, OP is wrong about Nintendo going after emulation?
That was Yuzu. They had code from the Switch SDK inside the emulator. Big no no. Emulators need to be clean room reverse engineeredIf i remember correctly, with the Dolphin. Could be wrong.
An Smart desicion…It might not mean anything, but Analog did shift away from shipping devices that would read ROMs from a SD card a while back so out of the box they do rely on carts to play games.
I don't understand what you are talking about, sorry.If they go after you, is almost secure they have a case. Don’t blame Nintendo in that case, blame the emulator creator. Simple.
Thats the problem, Nintendo always find something ilegal related to the emulator creator or the emulator itself.If emulation is illegal, then all PCs are all illegal.
All BIOS are emulating IBM-owned proprietary BIOS software.
It was deemed legal because those third party bios were made in a clean room environment, the same way emulators are made.
If emulation is illegal, then all PCs are all illegal.
I understand your point now, but that doesn't make emulators, in general, ilegals. That just proves that someone broke the copyright laws.Thats the problem, Nintendo always find something ilegal related to the emulator creator or the emulator itself.
Not that I'd ever bat for Nintendo, but literally every multiplatform publisher does this. You want the new EA FC 25 on four different platforms on launch day? Then you'll be paying full price, four times over for the same game. No-one ever moans about this, but if a platform holder ports an old-ass game to a new platform and charges a fraction of the price to get it there, somehow it's hugely unfair. Why is that?Yes, they are scum.
Is there a reason i should buy Ocarina of Time again in order to be able to play it on their new console?
I already bought the original one. I also bought it on the Wii VC. So i bought the same game twice already and i'm not talking about a remaster or anything... The same game.
So what if i play it on an emulator then? I don't give a shit about any other Nintendo console and i know i won't be able to play any of my bought copies there. So i play them on my PC for convenience because i don't want to have a N64 or a Wii connected (both consoles i already bought). What's your problem?
The other publishers don't attack emulation though. They let you play their games (you already bought) on an emulator if you want. Only Nintendo attacks emulators right now. And Sony did in the past and lost.Not that I'd ever bat for Nintendo, but literally every multiplatform publisher does this. You want the new EA FC 25 on four different platforms on launch day? Then you'll be paying full price, four times over for the same game. No-one ever moans about this, but if a platform holder ports an old-ass game to a new platform and charges a fraction of the price to get it there, somehow it's hugely unfair. Why is that?
fuck You Nintendo and thanks for building such easy system to emulate, its awesome to play everything u make in high def on my PC.
They don’t have to, for obvious reasons… they attack piracy.The other publishers don't attack emulation though. They let you play their games (you already bought) on an emulator if you want. Only Nintendo attacks emulators right now. And Sony did in the past and lost.
Which is not the same at all.They don’t have to, for obvious reasons… they attack piracy.
EA FC 25 is available on PC, and it’s not free DRM… For example.Which is not the same at all.
noMaybe people should stop being broke bitches and stealing their games.
I have no idea what you are talking about. Maybe i'm dumb.EA FC 25 is available on PC, and it’s not free DRM… For example.
Okay?Maybe people should stop being broke bitches and stealing their games.
I have no idea what you are talking about. Maybe i'm dumb.
In other news, emulation is legal. No matter how you stretch it.
Okay?
What does that have to do with the emulators? You can't even use an emulator to steal a game, it does not provide links to rom sites.
I mean, I own a few properties and I'm a manager at a CRM company so..........yeaIt's okay, we understand you don't have a job and live in your mom's basement.
It's okay, we understand you don't have a job and live in your mom's basement.
Believe what?Mmmmhmm sure, everyone believes that... wink wink nudge nudge
If you paid once you have the right to play it again and again so long as you still own it. Companies trying to tell stories and weave yarns that you’ve gotta keep buying the same title every console are just profit drivenWhat I find sad is that I don't believe it has anything to do with preserving the integrity of an original work. They just want to eliminate any way for people to play their games outside of paying THEM for the same old games again and again and again and again on their digital storefronts. They just want to keep charging you for The Legend of Zelda (NES) every time they release a new console, handheld, hybrid, gimmick device, etc.. I don't believe in doing illegal things like piracy. I believe in paying my honestly earned money for honestly made games. But all of these corporations have their own rackets and schemes and I'm not on board with those, either.