Nintendo statement on lack of adaptor in NA.

The new 3DS is sold at a reasonable price. It's not like they don't give you the choice. I don't need a 4th charger thx.

Oh that's cool that you don't need a 4th charger. Maybe you can sell 2-3 of them to others who may now want one. But I'd rather have the ability to charge and play something out of the box, rather than have to pay to get a charger separately. This is ridiculous and a horrendous decision from a business standpoint and you folks are eating it up so a billion dollar corporation doesn't want to spend what is pennies for them. It doesn't cost them $20 to add adapters to handheld consoles.
 
That packet of Cigarettes doesn't come with any matches. Total BS, fuck you Marlarboro. Imagine if a kid got a packet for Xmas how could he light them without the matches..totally irresponsible.

Vibrators don't come with batteries but you can still come without them.
 
The new 3DS is sold at a reasonable price. It's not like they don't give you the choice. I don't need a 4th charger thx.

Nintendo including the charger would likely not have driven up the retail price. They most likely did it to increase profits on each unit sold and to make profits off of people who need the charger. It's a shitty, indefensible practice. I mean, yeah, the charger isn't that expensive, but the principle behind the decision sucks.
 
The new 3DS is sold at a reasonable price. It's not like they don't give you the choice. I don't need a 4th charger thx.
How is going from $150 with a charging cable to $200 reasonable?
I just don't...

Edit: Also all new Vitas come with a 4GB memory card now. New 3DS probably doesn't have a microSD card.
 
ny0EZm2.jpg

Every bundle had a memory card included though, still BS prices though to this very day.
 
Bullshit. Unless they had planned on charging $204.99 for the new 3DS with an adapter included, I don't buy it for a second. They're simply cutting costs to pad the bottom line.
 
Yeah, yeah, I'm sure they got their reasons. I just imagine a parent buying one for their kid for Christmas and it comes without an AC adapter. How's Santa fuckin up an AC adapter


iTtzv0g.gif

Not only that but the whole new 3ds is going to be horrible for kids and parents. Imagine a mom buys lil Timmy a new game for his 3DS for his birthday except oops ite 's a new 3DS only game. The whole thing reeks of a a halfbaked idea to charge more for a redesign.
 
I agree with you, and much of the outrage on the Xone thing was because of that price differential.

That pricing is also why pre-orders stalled and the dramatic turn for MS happened too.

Here? Yeah, it's $5-$10. It won't get the huge outcry. People are obviously still buying the thing.

But at its core, this decision is worse and just so damned disappointing.Why would they want to treat the customer base this way when they need that customer base more now than they ever have before?

I agree.

Though honestly, we both know the answer to that: to increase profit margins through accessory purchase & see if the market responds accordingly as they have in Europe and Japan.

We'll see how it goes, could go either way - NoA is a much more difficult market.
 
If they included one, they'd probably just increase the price for the system.

I still think they should include them just so parents who don't know where to get them are covered, though.
 
Why do they have to use a proprietary adaptor? Why can't they just use USB 2.0 like every other device.... Then they don't have to worry about people like me not buying there device because of shit like this.

Who was saying Nintendo was pro consumer in another thread?

I was. And I do not regret saying it either.

If this were $20-30 fine, but it's $10, maybe even less. I bought one for my Gf for the equivalent of $2.

It's just a really weird decition... and here's the backlash.
 

Pretty sure plenty of people were very vocal about this and to some extent I believe this hurt the Vita's sales. The new console comes with 1GB now I believe to "mitigate" this issue.
What I'm saying is, Sony was punished by its stupidity, why should we give a free pass to Nintendo?
 
PS Vita 2000 comes with 1GB memory. If you buy retail carts for some games the saves, updates and DLC are saved on the carts.
Yeah, it is a mute point now considering every Vita you can buy in a store comes with a memory card. In fact, my Vita came with a charger, 3G capability, 4GB of memory, and a game for $200.

How is the new 3DS price reasonable?
 
I think we call can agree that no longer including the adapter is bullshit and sucks, but holy fuck the overreactions are insane.

Anti-consumer? Would you prefer if they charged you $220 and included it? Hell you can get one for $4 if you look around. Yet we're ok with Vita charging a virtual ton with memory sticks. We're ok with having HDMI cables missing from TV and monitor boxes. We're ok with day 1 DLC and patches.

But a $4-12 power adapter? Get the pitchforks and torches.

Yeah, it is a mute point now considering every Vita you can buy in a store comes with a memory card. In fact, my Vita came with a charger, 3G capability, and a game for $200.

How is the new 3DS price reasonable?

n3DS isn't a dead system?
 
But I'd rather have the ability to charge and play something out of the box, rather than have to pay to get a charger separately.

But you can't charge and play because games are not included :O you have to buy them seperately.

I get that it's a surprising decision for some of you but I don't get the overreaction. It says that the charger isn't included on the box and if it's like here in germany there are signs next to the consoles that point to it.
 
Limited editions coming without the game is a much more stupid concept. Not saying the charger thing isn't stupid, but in the long run it does not matter that much.
I disagree here. Say you're in Euorpe and ordered the MM 3D steelbook edition. You want the N3DSXL to go with it. Well since it is forced to come with the game you've just purchased the game twice effectively. Also you can't sell the game on as it is a digital version and selling the steelbook version defeats the purpose of buying it in the first place.

Meanwhile in America they complain about not being charged £40 extra for a game they don't want or need.

I can't tell if this is serious or not.
It was an example of something similarly essential that also requires a separate purchase and the cost of which is proportionately similar. i.e. The cigarettes are pretty useless if you can't light them yet there isn't public outcry here about them not coming with matches.
 
I was trying to help steer GAF members towards a product I've found useful. "Typical consumers at the store" aren't "typically GAF members. This is a shitty move by Nintendo and there's no reason for 3DS to not have a micro USB charge port. But regardless of the cables being a knock-off, it exists as a viable (and more convenient) alternative. Again this is a cheap move by Nintendo but the issue is rectified by a $1.96 Amazon purchase. Please calm down.

For the record, I do appreciate you linking that cable, which is much more versatile as you said by being USB instead of directly plugging to a wall.

Monitors leave out the HDMI/DP cables, and will ship (sometimes) either with a DVI or VGA... both of which can be entirely useless for modern cards.

Companies cut corners everywhere, Nintendo just chose to do it with the charger which is stupid.

I should've been more specific. I meant to say manufacturers of mobile hardware, and I do agree there's some corners of the world where manufacturers don't pack in a cable but at least they still use standard USB ports for charging their hardware.

I mean if we wanted to talk about all the corner-cutting in pack-ins we'd be here all day :P. "Batteries not included", for one.
 
This is lame. Charger is the second most important thing. Thankfully I own a 3ds and won't be buying any new 3ds
 
I agree.

Though honestly, we both know the answer to that: to increase profit margins through accessory purchase & see if the market responds accordingly as they have in Europe and Japan.

We'll see how it goes, could go either way - NoA is a much more difficult market.

I hear you. But this is the bet they make? I am all about corporate bottom lines. I'm a scum sucking corporate douchebag myself. And even I can't get my head around how this makes sense, that this is the way they try to squeeze out a couple extra bucks. It just makes no business sense (which I'm realizing offends me more than the consumer angle).
 
How is going from $150 with a charging cable to $200 reasonable?
I just don't...

Edit: Also all new Vitas come with a 4GB memory card now. New 3DS probably doesn't have a microSD card.

150? When I look on amazon, all old 3ds XL are sold for around 200 and that's without charger in EU.
 
I think we call can agree that no longer including the adapter is bullshit and sucks, but holy fuck the overreactions are insane.

Anti-consumer? Would you prefer if they charged you $220 and included it? Hell you can get one for $4 if you look around. Yet we're ok with Vita charging a virtual ton with memory sticks. We're ok with having HDMI cables missing from TV and monitor boxes. We're ok with day 1 DLC and patches.

But a $4-12 power adapter? Get the pitchforks and torches.

this is neogaf = overreaction
 
So much hostility its $8 extra if you don't already own one.

If it's so cheep, why didn't they just add it in the damn box?

People, it's not about the money. It's about the message this shit sends. If Nintendo gets away with this, they will keep removing and removing.

Watch Nintendo not even include the controller for there next home console. XD
 
Sony charges people $50 a year to play peer to peer multiplayer games online and no one seems upset about it.

But you're right. If they left out the $5 microusb charging cord for the DS4, there would probably be a great wailing and gnashing of teeth and many meme pictures for days.

PS+ pays for itself so many times over with how many games you get from the service. Not to mention the discounts on purchasing games if you want to do that. Plus its completely optional, not the same as a power cord lol.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/12/13/7...ave-away-more-than-1300-in-free-games-in-2014
 
New 3DS probably doesn't have a microSD card.

It does, a 4gb microsd card.


PS+ pays for itself so many times over with how many games you get from the service. Not to mention the discounts on purchasing games if you want to do that. Plus its completely optional, not the same as a power cord lol.
http://www.polygon.com/2014/12/13/7...ave-away-more-than-1300-in-free-games-in-2014

It doesn't pay for itself at all if you had no intention of buying the games given to you, or were going to wait until they were dirt cheap. I would never have purchased Infamous Last Light if Sony didn't throw it at me. Nor do I care about The Swapper, though I might have picked it up cheap someday.

Meanwhile, I do want to play online for Bloodborne.

Sony isn't "giving" you money with PS+. They're taking it from you. They're making it slightly less painful by salving the wound with old games that have already long passed their sales prime, or a few indie titles that probably never would have hit it big otherwise.
 
So what if Apple releases a new Ipad without a charger, and they use the same excuse that old Ipads use the same charger and they dont want to overprice the consumer

Im sorry but that sounds truly stupid as hell

Im just using Apple as an example here. Not sure how anyone could defend this nonsense.
 
I think we call can agree that no longer including the adapter is bullshit and sucks, but holy fuck the overreactions are insane.

Anti-consumer? Would you prefer if they charged you $220 and included it? Hell you can get one for $4 if you look around. Yet we're ok with Vita charging a virtual ton with memory sticks. We're ok with having HDMI cables missing from TV and monitor boxes. We're ok with day 1 DLC and patches.

But a $4-12 power adapter? Get the pitchforks and torches.



n3DS isn't a dead system?

I'm pretty sure people complained a lot about those points you just mentioned. This isn't exclusive to Nintendo somehow.
 
Yeah an $8 adapter is anti-consumer but $40 for 2GB is perfectly ok.

What are you talking about? Sony has gotten a ton of shit for their bloated Vita memory card prices. People still (rightly) complain about it whenever the topic comes up.

Implying Sony got a pass on Vita memory cards is absurd revisionist history.
 
It's disgusting and it shouldn't be allowed to sell a product that is not usable out of the box when the thing that is missing/needed is proprietary.
 
People, it's not about the money. It's about the message this shit sends. If Nintendo gets away with this, they will keep removing and removing.

Nintendo has been getting away with this for years. They took the adapters out of some units in Japan and Europe a while ago. This isn't new, and they've already received the message: people generally don't care. The US will inevitably get over it just like every other region had to.
 
People who keep saying this are completely missing the point. It's not about money.

About what then? If I had the choice, I would choose the SKU WITHOUT charger. Others would choose differently. Can't win them all.

I'd totally buy the cradle though because they are extremely nice :)
 
Top Bottom