Snaku said:The humans will never win. ZOMBIE POWA! ZOMBIE POWA!
8.8?Shaheed79 said:I highly doubt he would upscore no more than .2 points from what he normally would score the game.
DSN2K said:I cant question the other scores like gameplay...what not but anyone who gives this game 9 for graphics is either blind or has been sitting in cave somewhere for the last 5 years.
Don't see many screams of killer app, I see alot of people relieved it doesn't completely suck.Shaheed79 said:Oh I don't blame a single soul who was going to buy a 360 regardless of PDZ. I would buy it myself after that review but the term "killer app" being thrown around is a tad premature. I await you guys impressions of the game with empathy but I really want to hear honest impressions from a fan of the first game more than anything.
I have! A 9 for graphics is laughable. The graphics are incredibly uneven, and I don't think the good parts are enough to make up for the really, really terrible parts.GashPrex said:because you've played the game?
Ryudo said:Greg never over-rates games. He is always very tough. If anything, you can always trust how negative he will be towards a game.
Gotta agree. It's clearly a game that got caught in mid-transition to next gen. Some parts are very pretty and full of high-res textures, others look like passable current-gen game. It's a world removed from Condemned or even COD2, which are true next-gen games.Rummy Bunnz said:I have! A 9 for graphics is laughable. The graphics are incredibly uneven, and I don't think the good parts are enough to make up for the really, really terrible parts.
yeah i had a nice laugh when i saw 'Wallace Court' in i believe the subway...GhaleonEB said:And a Wallace Court in one of the levels. :lol
Cerrius said:hey faceless, are bot personalities in PDZ?
Haven't seen a reviewer say anything about the issue so I was wondering.
psycho_snake said:Damn You rare for making this game so good and giving me the greatest urge to go and spend $400 just to play this game!
Lucky you! I received plenty of money for my birthday so I could easily afford it. Im feeling a very big urge to go out and spend the money on a brand new Xbox360 with a brand new copy of PD0Ash Housewares said:seriously, it's a good thing I don't have $400
psycho_snake said:Lucky you! I received plenty of money for my birthday so I could easily afford it. Im feeling a very big urge to go out and spend the money on a brand new Xbox360 with a brand new copy of PD0![]()
DreamMachine said:The video review is up it sounds like greg really likes it..
Cerrius said:Yup.
While I'm glad to see PDZ has turned out to be a solid sequel, it still doesn't match the original in features.
For the next PD, I want (if it's not planned for DLC already):
blood
more realistic art style
cheat system with target times
more weapons (match the 40+ from the original)
and plenty more stuff I can't think of right now because I'm so damn happy PDZ didn't flop.![]()
Speevy said:I just mowed down a ton of trolls on my bad art horse.
Yep, the score is laughable, they will realize that when games on all next gen consoles will look 2-3x as good as this (2 times effects-wise, 5 times the geometry, 3 times as good animations)DSN2K said:So Gamespot have now set what it takes to get a 9.0 on 360 and the bar is so very very low, Kasavin must have very little expectations for Next Gen.
its insulting to the guys at Bizarre Creations rating their visuals on the same level as this.
I don't think Greg K reviewed Far Cry. I think Jason Ocampo reviewed both Far Cry games.dark10x said:I gotta admit, Greg's review has me very interested. I really did want this game to turn out, but it just seemed like it was going to fail. The impressions we've heard over the last few days have been really negative too. I'm completely shocked.
I almost always agree with GK, for some reason, so this is actually a pretty big deal. I mean, I obviously judge things on my own, but his reviews usually give me an idea before hand. There was one major exception, of course. He rated Far Cry very highly, but I found the game to be an absolute shit fest (with amazing visuals). Hated it.
Hopefully that doesn't occure again...
Well, can't wait to see other reviews.
what's it like in fantasy land? i've always wondered.quetz67 said:Yep, the score is laughable, they will realize that when games on all next gen consoles will look 2-3x as good as this (2 times effects-wise, 5 times the geometry, 3 times as good animations)
I think the animation in PDZ is really bad and I suppose it will be mostly perfect this gen. you can say thats factor 10 or it is factor 2, whatever, it will look much more realistic.Mike Works said:hahaha, three times as good animations?
how did you get that figure?
quetz67 said:I think the animation in PDZ is really bad and I suppose it will be mostly perfect this gen. you can say thats factor 10 or it is factor 2, whatever, it will look much more realistic.
You're right.Sathsquatch said:I don't think Greg K reviewed Far Cry. I think Jason Ocampo reviewed both Far Cry games.
The difference will be on many different levels.Jerkface said:"Mostly perfect"?
The only difference will be the amount of animations available at a time, not the quality.
quetz67 said:The difference will be on many different levels.
Man, who cares? The increase in graphical quality will be MUCH more visible than that between Halo 1 and Halo 2 for exampleVALIS said:By a factor of 2. Or 10.
quetz67 said:Man, who cares? The increase in graphical quality will be MUCH more visible than that between Halo 1 and Halo 2 for example
PGR3? Kameo?Ghost said:How the hell are you supposed to review a game against games that dont even exist yet?
If you score games against others, not that gamespot does, you can only score them against what's already available.