• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Persona 5 Review Thread

LotusHD

Banned
Yeah, if you start going down this route, you can technically dock any game that lacks a PC version for not allowing you a wide breadth of customization options.

I mean I guess. I really don't see the issue. 8.5 is suddenly a bad score. She admits it might be unfair. And it isn't even like it's a completely random criticism, since P4 Golden was on the Vita, so there's a precedent there. It's just silly to get hung up over it.
 

MSMrRound

Member
Especially shocked that ign showed it that much love.

*Clicks on IGN link-something tells me it's going to be Andrew Goldfarb....

"BY ANDREW GOLDFARB In stark contrast to...."*

Welp, guess I was right. Andrew's one of the biggest Persona nuts out there in the IGN office, so for him to give that score I'm not too surprised.
 

Wanderer5

Member
You don't wish to play potentially one of the best RPGs of last 10 years because you couldn't be arsed to hook up a PS3 you already own to a TV. Yeah....

Nowadays I get into gaming more when I am on the PC, on the go, or in my bed. *shrug* I know that might sound weird, but yeah.
 
J

JeremyEtcetera

Unconfirmed Member
Japan better not get snubbed at any game awards this year. Zelda will when GotY, but from music to action to RPG Japan killed it.

I can see it now. Geoff Keighly's Game Awards 2017 Nominees for GotY:

Horizon: Zero Dawn
Ghost Recon Wildlands
Call of Duty 2017
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Assassin's Creed 2017
Zelda (just so Reggie shows up with exclusive vids, but it won't win)

and Neogaf will be furious.
 

brian!

Member
Because she says it is her only major complaint.

It is like reviewing a PSVita game and saying "yeah it is good and all but if it was on PS4 it would be much better". Like, WTF? Port begging on reviews now?

I feel like if a mainline pokemon game came out for a console saying something like "yeah pokemon really works better on the go" and docking points for that would be fine. I mean you're allowed to think w/e about the game or her criticism, but she says something she wishes was different and talks about it a bit. It's not hard for me to imagine something like her thinking the game is a 90 and then docking 5 points because she personally thinks it's more suitable for portable gaming.
 

Grim-Reality

Neo Member
It's not. P5 is cross gen, I get that. I'm just saying I can't believe PS4 and Xbox One 4 years in don't have a 95+ title between the two of them that was made specifically with them in mind.

Does it really matter? It's just a number at the end of the day. I think a lot of people would also argue that games like Bloodborne and the Witcher 3 are of similar quality to some of the 95+ scoring games of last gen, and reviews recently have been somewhat harsher than they were 5-10 years ago.
 

Maxinas

Member
I can see it now. Geoff Keighly's Game Awards 2017 Nominees for GotY:

Horizon: Zero Dawn
Ghost Recon Wildlands
Call of Duty 2017
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Assassin's Creed 2017
Zelda (just so Reggie shows up with exclusive vids, but it won't win)

and Neogaf will be furious.

Surprised you didn't include RDR2, but i'm one of the firm believers that it won't release this year. You also didn't include Mario.
 

Markitron

Is currently staging a hunger strike outside Gearbox HQ while trying to hate them to death
I have never heard of this series until recently, and I'm not mad about JRPG's, but these reviews are hard to ignore. Will this be inaccessible to me?

I can see it now. Geoff Keighly's Game Awards 2017 Nominees for GotY:

Horizon: Zero Dawn
Ghost Recon Wildlands
Call of Duty 2017
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Assassin's Creed 2017
Zelda (just so Reggie shows up with exclusive vids, but it won't win)

and Neogaf will be furious.

Horizon will be on most shortlists.
 

Loxley

Member
Man, we're not even half-way through 2017 and its already reaching God-tier status as far as number of great game releases.
 

MTC100

Banned
Oh I would be more than fine with the PS3 version, but I am not sure if I be active enough to get out my PS3 that I felt I was pretty much mostly done with and try to get through this long (turn based) RPG on the TV. I know that might sound weird, but I pretty much moved towards PC/portable (including playing WiiU exclusively on gamepad), so eh.

I see, my PC is connected to my FHD TV and I play my games from my bed, it's quite comfortable that way, so I can't really relate to your situation. I also would've loved to see HH games on my TV(guess the Switch will make that happen) instead, like Persona 4G for example ^^
 
I don't understand how a game that takes 100 hours to mainline isn't getting docked on the review because of the length.

40 seems to be the jrpg sweet spot for me.

Probably because people enjoyed it too much. Many people said they found themselves wishing to go back or hoping it would go on "just one more hour" the entire way through. I understand time sinks are a problem for people (it's probably going to take me quite some time to finish this game considering I work full time amongst other things), but I put in just as many hours into previous entries in the franchise and never felt like it overstayed it's welcome. If it's consistent for those 100 hours, why should it be docked for being 100 hours? I personally prefer longer shows/anime/games because it allows me to become attached to the characters and world.

Not trying to attack you or say length isn't a valid criticism for people, because some people prefer shorter and more concise gaming experiences. But that didn't seem to be an issue for most of these reviewers.
 

Aeana

Member
Gonna say something totally radical and out-there: a reviewer can dock points for anything they want, because a review is an opinion piece. The reason we get multiple reviews is to get multiple perspectives on a game. This might be better understood if people actually read multiple reviews and synthesized the impressions around their personal tastes rather than complaining about how a given score affects a metascore.
 

Shengar

Member
I think it's a valid complaint. Monster hunter would absolutely be better on a switch than on a 3ds for some. Me included.

It's a valid point to be raised but not a valid complaint. I mean, RPG in general feels more like a home on modern handheld that can be put to sleep anytime and enable you to play anywhere. But if the game does not exist on a more "fitting" platform, that doesn't mean it deserve a negative over it in any way.
 

MTC100

Banned
*Clicks on IGN link-something tells me it's going to be Andrew Goldfarb....

"BY ANDREW GOLDFARB In stark contrast to...."*

Welp, guess I was right. Andrew's one of the biggest Persona nuts out there in the IGN office, so for him to give that score I'm not too surprised.

Not surprised that it's "only a 9.7" or not surprised it's rated so high? Others rated it a 10 you know.
 
Really? That's pretty cool.

Not completely standalone, they take palce in the same universe and there are a lot of references (though most of them minor, P2 and P4 are the most reference heavy). P3 and P5 are very light on major references and this one should be great to jump into.
 

N7.Angel

Member
Fuck you Sony...I still haven't finished Nioh and Horizon and you come up with this ? glad I finished Yakuza 0 and Zelda lol, sorry wallet but you have another gem to buy.
 

N30RYU

Member
Gonna say something totally radical and out-there: a reviewer can dock points for anything they want, because a review is an opinion piece. The reason we get multiple reviews is to get multiple perspectives on a game. This might be better understood if people actually read multiple reviews and synthesized the impressions around their personal tastes rather than complaining about how a given score affects a metascore.

I agree with you... but right now like me some ppl are afraid of spoilers and reviews sometimes talk too much... so right now I just watch a couple of video reviews and read a few conclusions...

i don't know if it was IGN o gamestop video review that popped a "may contain spoilers" and i just jumped to the score...
 
Wanting the game to be on a portable because you want to watch tv while you play either means the gameplay system is crap or you cant focus.
 

robotrock

Banned
god you guys

IT'S HERE!! IT'S HERE!!!

WH2sQ2k.png


legit don't think I've been more excited for a video game before haha
 

4Tran

Member
do you have the R&D costs for this game? are those published? if not how do you know? tales out of ...?
I don't, but it's not really necessary either. AAA games nowadays will typically cost $40M to develop, and it's pretty obvious that Persona 5 isn't going to be in that range. Moreover, marketing budgets will be similarly large to justify that kind of expense, and it's also obvious that Sega didn't advertise it that much.

Atlus makes relatively modest games because that's where their strengths lie and because it suits the size of staff they have. Persona 5 is bigger than any of their other games, but it's still not in the big boys' league.
 

Wagram

Member
Gonna say something totally radical and out-there: a reviewer can dock points for anything they want, because a review is an opinion piece. The reason we get multiple reviews is to get multiple perspectives on a game. This might be better understood if people actually read multiple reviews and synthesized the impressions around their personal tastes rather than complaining about how a given score affects a metascore.

People would hate me if I reviewed Zelda. I'm having a ton of fun with the game, but I would dock the shit out of the game for the horse system. It drives me craazy.
 

Type2

Member
Gonna say something totally radical and out-there: a reviewer can dock points for anything they want, because a review is an opinion piece. The reason we get multiple reviews is to get multiple perspectives on a game. This might be better understood if people actually read multiple reviews and synthesized the impressions around their personal tastes rather than complaining about how a given score affects a metascore.

It'll happen time and time again with the complaints about x score. I typically know if im going to buy a game or not before reviews and if im on the fence I parse through or read trusted sites to confirm that the things I want from the game indeed work. If I can handle the flaws they mention or dont view them large enough to detract from my own experience then i'm all aboard.

Glad to see Persona 5 is doing well and with embargo up its only a week before its in my hands.
 
Gonna say something totally radical and out-there: a reviewer can dock points for anything they want, because a review is an opinion piece. The reason we get multiple reviews is to get multiple perspectives on a game. This might be better understood if people actually read multiple reviews and synthesized the impressions around their personal tastes rather than complaining about how a given score affects a metascore.

The score is meaningless and more thought should be given to the actual review itself but that's not how people are unfortunately. Need Amazon to dispatch this on Saturday so I can become "sick" on Tuesday and skip work.
 

Impulsor

Member
Dont you see the rabbit hole this can create?
Ermm... a discussion in a forum?
It's a valid point to be raised but not a valid complaint. I mean, RPG in general feels more like a home on modern handheld that can be put to sleep anytime and enable you to play anywhere. But if the game does not exist on a more "fitting" platform, that doesn't mean it deserve a negative over it in any way.

I understand where you are coming from, but since a review is a subjective opinion of an individual that has played the game, I can perfectly understand someone saying, "I would enjoy this game more if it was portable".

It can perfectly earn a worse score because of the platform it exists on, for many reasons, because a platform can make the game feel limited or different, and even play different.

Going back to my Monster Hunter comparison. You immediately miss a second stick, and even if you have the new 3ds, you miss a propper second stick. That didn't stop me from pouring over 300 hours on MH4U on the 3ds.

The platform CAN influence how a person enjoys the game and influence this or hers opinion on it.

Obviously you don't have to agree. I don't, I enjoy playing on my TV way more than portable, but I can totally understand that someone would enjoy the same game more on another platform because of personal preference.
 

MSMrRound

Member
Not surprised that it's "only a 9.7" or not surprised it's rated so high? Others rated it a 10 you know.

Not surprised it's rated so high. Have you seen Andrew's desk? It's full of Persona merchandise, especially Koromaru.

So what if others have rated it a 10?

I played through the import copy of Persona 5. While I still rate it very highly and I'm pretty pumped to play through it in English, it is by no means a perfect 10 if you were to judge it with a critical eye instead of blind hype.

The Kotaku article echoed one of my thoughts which was one of the final acts went on for a tad longer than it really needed to be.

There are other complaints from myself really,but the positives massively outweigh them.


I've never played the Persona series. What would be a good starting point to get into it? Persona 4?


No, it's perfectly fine to jump in straight away with Persona 5. If you start with Persona 4, you might find yourself too exhausted to carry on with Persona 5 because of how long it takes to clear the game. With that being said, you can always revisit Persona 4 another time.
 
Is it needed to play the other games before jumping into this? Really want to get it so I am curious.

I've never played the Persona series. What would be a good starting point to get into it? Persona 4?

Persona 5 is fine if you don't have the time to play the others. (They're not connected past cameos and easter eggs)

Though if you do have time, check out Persona 3 and 4, they're where the current style of Persona started out.
 

robotrock

Banned
I've never played the Persona series. What would be a good starting point to get into it? Persona 4?
It honestly doesn't matter. I started with 4 Golden, and had such a good time that I went straight to Persona 3 on my PS2.

You'll also be fine starting with 5 if you wanted to I'm sure, but 4 and 3 would both work about equally as alright.

Btw Persona 2 is totally worth checking out too.
 
Ermm... a discussion in a forum?


I understand where you are coming from, but since a review is a subjective opinion of an individual that has played the game, I can perfectly understand someone saying, "I would enjoy this game more if it was portable".

It can perfectly earn a worse score because of the platform it exists on, for many reasons, because a platform can make the game feel limited or different, and even play different.

Going back to my Monster Hunter comparison. You immediately miss a second stick, and even if you have the new 3ds, you miss a propper second stick. That didn't stop me from pouring over 300 hours on MH4U on the 3ds.

The platform CAN influence how a person enjoys the game and influence this or hers opinion on it.

Obviously you don't have to agree. I don't, I enjoy playing on my TV way more than portable, but I can totally understand that someone would enjoy the same game more on another platform because of personal preference.


Why are we glossing the fact that the reason is "I want to watch tv while I play"?!!
 

Maxinas

Member
I don't understand how a game that takes 100 hours to mainline isn't getting docked on the review because of the length.

40 seems to be the jrpg sweet spot for me.

This is on the same level as people wishing the game got bad scores so they didn't have a reason to buy the game.
 
Top Bottom