• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2013 |OT3| 1,000 Years of Darkness and Nuclear Fallout

Status
Not open for further replies.

Piecake

Member
Meh. After 5 years of high unemployment and no jobs, she should focus on the biggest issue in the black economy: jobs.

Judicial reform is pretty tied into jobs because if you have a felony conviction you are essentially barred from ever having a job. And that's either 1/3 or 1/8 African American (found conflicitng figures)
 

One isn't zero. and as we've seen with medical marijuana in the US, One state going that route and succeeding leads to a domino effect. There is literally no reason whatsoever for marijuana to be illegal on the level that it is. none.

And yes I don't think federal statue will make it legal like tobacco or alcohol in that time period. I think there is a good chance it will be legal in most and won't be an enforced offense federally. Maybe even a rescheduling.

a "rescheduling" is essentially legalization. It's perfectly legal to buy schedule III or IV drugs with a prescription.

The issue for the federal government is that once a significant portion of the states legalize marijuana outright, enforcement becomes nearly impossible, or at least implausible and pointless.

Obviously the issues go hand in hand. People drop out of school when they don't feel they have any hope or reason to graduate, because there are no jobs. That's what I hear where I volunteer at Detroit high schools.The recession and weak recovery has hurt blacks and Hispanics more than anyone else, and there are few signs of recovery for them.

I disagree a little with you here, because that's a nonsensical argument. "I'm going to drop out of high school because there are no jobs, therefore making it harder for me to find a job...?"
High school dropouts happen for a lot of reasons, i don't want to reduce it to just one. But gang and drug activity in the neighborhood is a HUGE one. For instance:

*drug money now is easier than job money 2 to 3 years from now
*three strikes laws and criminalization of marijuana remove fathers and role models from the community
*violence in and around the school may mean it's simply safer NOT to go.

Decriminalizing/legalizing marijuana gets rid of a big chunk of this, and smarter policy re: enforcement gets rid of the rest. Education reform in general would go a long way towards ensuring that schools that would LIKE to do a better job educating students have the financial means to do so. "jobs" is a short term band aid that does not address the root of the problem. You can create more "jobs", but still have a dysfunctional school system and a destroyed community.
 
One isn't zero. and as we've seen with medical marijuana in the US, One state going that route and succeeding leads to a domino effect. There is literally no reason whatsoever for marijuana to be illegal on the level that it is. none.



a "rescheduling" is essentially legalization. It's perfectly legal to buy schedule III or IV drugs with a prescription.

The issue for the federal government is that once a significant portion of the states legalize marijuana outright, enforcement becomes nearly impossible, or at least implausible and pointless.
No it's not because you can still make it legal for non medical purposes and attatch criminal penalties. Yeah its gonna be pretty easy to come by and not be as stigmatized and states will legalize it with the feds increasingly not caring but this will stymie most federal legalization efforts. Meaning a true recognition of legality
 
No it's not because you can still make it legal for non medical purposes and attatch criminal penalties. Yeah its gonna be pretty easy to come by and not be as stigmatized and states will legalize it with the feds increasingly not caring but this will stymie most federal legalization efforts. Meaning a true recognition of legality

Lol.

From the article, A big part of the polical barriers to opposition is "The United States, one of the most influential Parties to the Single Convention, has tended to oppose loosening cannabis laws."

You don't say.

So what happens when that reverses? The United States no longer opposes it, and backs decriminalization and legalization? This group is going to say "no, United States, you can't do that" and we back down? When has this ever happened?

And as far as INCB opposition, again from the same article:

On March 5, 2013, the INCB urged the United States government to challenge the legalization of marijuana for recreational use in Colorado and Washington. INCB President, Raymond Yans stated that these state laws violate international drug treaties, namely the United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961. The Office of the US Attorney General said in December 2012 that regardless of any changes in state law, growing, selling or possessing any amount of marijuana remained illegal under federal law. Raymond Yans called the statement “good but insufficient” and said he hoped that the issue would soon be addressed by the US Government in line with the international drug control treaties. [6]

The US government sure did bend over to pressure to stop Colorado and Washington there, didn't they? This board has no teeth.
 
I disagree a little with you here, because that's a nonsensical argument. "I'm going to drop out of high school because there are no jobs, therefore making it harder for me to find a job...?"
High school dropouts happen for a lot of reasons, i don't want to reduce it to just one. But gang and drug activity in the neighborhood is a HUGE one. For instance:

*drug money now is easier than job money 2 to 3 years from now
*three strikes laws and criminalization of marijuana remove fathers and role models from the community
*violence in and around the school may mean it's simply safer NOT to go.

Decriminalizing/legalizing marijuana gets rid of a big chunk of this, and smarter policy re: enforcement gets rid of the rest. Education reform in general would go a long way towards ensuring that schools that would LIKE to do a better job educating students have the financial means to do so. "jobs" is a short term band aid that does not address the root of the problem. You can create more "jobs", but still have a dysfunctional school system and a destroyed community.

But that's the thing: all those distractions are seen as more profitable than school. Why finish highschool so you can work at McDonalds or be unemployed, when you can make more money hustling (or worse)? When you have a depressed block with little to no successful examples of people who "escaped" the block through education, people look inwards for a solution. And that solution oftentimes isn't pretty. I don't mean to stereotype all struggling neighborhoods like this of course, but it's a major problem in a lot of inner cities. It's also an issue in some rural areas too, to be fair.
 
Lol.

From the article, A big part of the polical barriers to opposition is "The United States, one of the most influential Parties to the Single Convention, has tended to oppose loosening cannabis laws."

You don't say.

So what happens when that reverses? The United States no longer opposes it, and backs decriminalization and legalization? This group is going to say "no, United States, you can't do that" and we back down? When has this ever happened?

And as far as INCB opposition, again from the same article:



The US government sure did bend over to pressure to stop Colorado and Washington there, didn't they? This board has no teeth.

I don't know if you're reading why I'm typing.

I think there will be a lot of cannabis reform. Just that its not going to get legalization nationwide or at the federal level in 20-30 years. I'm not saying it's good or bad.

You can't just back out of a treaty. And your reading more what you want to read and ignoring the other problems. That treaty has kept weed nominally illegal in most of those countries that are bastions of weed liberalism. They prevent its full acceptance. It's gonna be a long time before it's like other legal drugs. The treaty also allows conservatives and others ways to slow down reform

And within the states that have legalized it even medically the feds are still doing raids and disrupting people lives who complying with state law (the nation had a great article how the war on weed is in full effect even with the media declaring it over). I just think weed reformists are getting WAY too ahead of themselves comparing this to gay marriage and downplaying the challenges ahead for them.
 
Meh. After 5 years of high unemployment and no jobs, she should focus on the biggest issue in the black economy: jobs.

The fact that Bill destroyed the welfare system doesn't help. It's a huge detriment to not only blacks but single mothers and other impoverished groups. But hey, Slick Willy wanted to impress centrists as being tough on "welfare queens" so he can get re-elected so he had to do it!

I'll never forgive him for what he did to welfare in 1996, and I'll never vote for Hillary because of it.


And when it comes to jobs I don't want another bubble like what happened under Bill, I want long term, sustainable, economic growth, not four years of boom and a decade of recession.
 
The fact that Bill destroyed the welfare system doesn't help. It's a huge detriment to not only blacks but single mothers and other impoverished groups. But hey, Slick Willy wanted to impress centrists as being tough on "welfare queens" so he can get re-elected so he had to do it!

I'll never forgive him for what he did to welfare in 1996, and I'll never vote for Hillary because of it.


And when it comes to jobs I don't want another bubble like what happened under Bill, I want long term, sustainable, economic growth, not four years of boom and a decade of recession.

Clinton didn't create the bubble, so I don't know why you're faulting him for it.

Personally I have no problem with the idea of welfare reform in theory. If you're able to work, having to find a job doesn't strike me as a bad thing. The problem with the law is that not everyone can find a job, and the even larger problem is that many mothers on welfare were screwed over. If some type of federal daycare plan was passed alongside the law, it would have worked a lot better.
 

Piecake

Member
Clinton didn't create the bubble, so I don't know why you're faulting him for it.

Personally I have no problem with the idea of welfare reform in theory. If you're able to work, having to find a job doesn't strike me as a bad thing. The problem with the law is that not everyone can find a job, and the even larger problem is that many mothers on welfare were screwed over. If some type of federal daycare plan was passed alongside the law, it would have worked a lot better.

I would imagine federal daycare and paid parental leave would be a pretty big boost to the economy. It would actually allow parents to work full time if they so choose instead of deciding to pay the ridiculous cost of daycare or one of them stay home. It would put a lot of money back into lower and middle class families
 
The times is reporting that healthcare.gov isn't even running on dedicated servers. It handles other stuff too.

This is really amazing how bad they screwed this up.
"Experts involved in the repair work say the overhaul is necessary because bursts of traffic beyond the designed capacity could bog down the site, forcing users into an electronic queue until emails notify them that they can return.

The only solution, several experts said, is to reconfigure many of the site’s computer servers so that they are dedicated solely to HealthCare.gov’s tasks. Currently, most of the servers juggle demands from other clients as well."
 

Oblivion

Fetishing muscular manly men in skintight hosery
Ugh, not only is everyone on my twitter feed talking about football, but they're talking about COLLEGE football. :/
 

Piecake

Member
I am hoping FSU and OSU win out. I am really getting sick of that dumb ass conference winning it every year (though OSU isnt much better)
 
Ugh, not only is everyone on my twitter feed talking about football, but they're talking about COLLEGE football. :/

join the club

This.

Who cares if OSU and FSU will also be obnoxious in victory, SECSECSEC is the worst.

...

Look what you did, Oblivion!

hater

why haven't you mass banned SEC-GAF yet

Lol ESPN was hyping auburn jumping to second lol.

of course they would
 
Luckily, I wasn't raised by him. Or near him.

I visit my grandparents for thanksgiving, which is also where he lives, so I have to see him.

But yeah, true story. :/

Empty Vessel: See he's nowhere near intellectual enough to come to any of those conclusions.

Hey, my dad is looney as the day is long, so no judgement here :D
 
I don't think anyone but OSU fans would give a shit. I am a big 10 alumni and think the OSU sports program is just sleazy, and has more in common with the SEC than the Big 10.

how can this statement be true if everyone would be delighted to see OSU get wrecked :p
 

Piecake

Member
how can this statement be true if everyone would be delighted to see OSU get wrecked :p

Well, let me amend that. I dont think anyone but OSU fans would be upset. I will root for big 10 teams when they are facing someone else and be a bit sad if they lose in an important game. OSU? Well, ill still probably root for them, but I definitely won't give a shit if they lose.
 
But that's the thing: all those distractions are seen as more profitable than school. Why finish highschool so you can work at McDonalds or be unemployed, when you can make more money hustling (or worse)? When you have a depressed block with little to no successful examples of people who "escaped" the block through education, people look inwards for a solution. And that solution oftentimes isn't pretty. I don't mean to stereotype all struggling neighborhoods like this of course, but it's a major problem in a lot of inner cities. It's also an issue in some rural areas too, to be fair.

The point being made though is that creating jobs doesn't specifically help black people, it helps everyone, but there's plenty to be done in judicial and education reform that would specifically help black people. I personally think you help the black community a lot more if you focus on fixing a lot of the stupid laws and other problems that cause them to be less successful than whites than focusing on some vague assertion of creating more jobs.
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
For those who missed it, This American Life did a great episode on housing discrimination and segregation last week.

And it even made George Romney look cool.
 
For those who missed it, This American Life did a great episode on housing discrimination and segregation last week.

And it even made George Romney look cool.

George Romney was a perfectly respectable man who would've been 10 times the President than Nixon was. It's too bad his son turned out to be an asshole.
 
Kind of like the Bush family.

Eh, Papa Bush was 'moderate' for 1990's Republicanism, which is of course, wild eyed socialism today. But, he still OK'd the Willie Horton ads and all the other evil crap that Lee Atwater said. Romney was an actual Rockefeller Republican who'd be a mainstream Democrat today.
 

Piecake

Member
For those who missed it, This American Life did a great episode on housing discrimination and segregation last week.

And it even made George Romney look cool.

Havent listened to it, but we obviously don't have forced segregation now, but from what ive read/heard its more about realtors thinking "Oh, youre a Black/Hispanic/Asian/White person so I will only show houses where those people live because obviously want to live by people like you. I don't think that necessarily means that there is any negative or racist thought process behind it.
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
Eh, Papa Bush was 'moderate' for 1990's Republicanism, which is of course, wild eyed socialism today. But, he still OK'd the Willie Horton ads and all the other evil crap that Lee Atwater said. Romney was an actual Rockefeller Republican who'd be a mainstream Democrat today.
That's why I put "kind of", haha.
 

Hitokage

Setec Astronomer
Havent listened to it, but we obviously don't have forced segregation now, but from what ive read/heard its more about realtors thinking "Oh, youre a Black/Hispanic/Asian/White person so I will only show houses where those people live because obviously want to live by people like you. I don't think that necessarily means that there is any negative or racist thought process behind it.
You should listen to it. Your suggestion there is thoroughly addressed.
 
I remember in a "American impressions thread" in which foreigners talk about their experiences while in the country they often commented on how insanely segregated the country is. "Wait you have schools with primarily black people? What!?"
 
I remember in a "American impressions thread" in which foreigners talk about their experiences while in the country they often commented on how insanely segregated the country is. "Wait you have schools with primarily black people? What!?"

Well, I kind of assumed it was the same way in Europe too.

Go to a random German school. Would you REALLY expect the number of dark skin students to be even with the number of ethnically white German kids?
 

War Peaceman

You're a big guy.
Well, I kind of assumed it was the same way in Europe too.

Go to a random German school. Would you REALLY expect the number of dark skin students to be even with the number of ethnically white German kids?

Speaking from a UK perspective, it is obviously predominantly white across most schools. Though in certain areas - London, Birmingham and Leicester spring to mind - you will have areas with predominantly black or South Asian pupils. I've spoken to multiple people who said that whites were the minority in their school.

I don't know how applicable it is to the USA, though, because the racial demography is very different over here. You tend to have large clumps of different races in certain areas. There is one area of London that is famous for its Bangladeshi community, for example. It is difficult to say how much that is to do with segregation as it is to do with people moving to be with their families. It becomes something of a self-fulfilling prophecy. We don't really have the history of domestic racism that you lot do; I think communities - particularly of first generation immigrants - tend to clump together along racial lines.
 
Well, I kind of assumed it was the same way in Europe too.

Go to a random German school. Would you REALLY expect the number of dark skin students to be even with the number of ethnically white German kids?

They meant that there were schools that were mostly black despite being only 15% of the country.

Speaking from a UK perspective, it is obviously predominantly white across most schools. Though in certain areas - London, Birmingham and Leicester spring to mind - you will have areas with predominantly black or South Asian pupils. I've spoken to multiple people who said that whites were the minority in their school.

I don't know how applicable it is to the USA, though, because the racial demography is very different over here. You tend to have large clumps of different races in certain areas. There is one area of London that is famous for its Bangladeshi community, for example. It is difficult to say how much that is to do with segregation as it is to do with people moving to be with their families. It becomes something of a self-fulfilling prophecy. We don't really have the history of domestic racism that you lot do; I think communities - particularly of first generation immigrants - tend to clump together along racial lines.

Interesting.
 

War Peaceman

You're a big guy.
They meant that there were schools that were mostly black despite being only 15% of the country.



Interesting.

To be a bit more concise, the UK has been monocultural for a long time. Racial division is a very, very recent phenomena. North America was built on genocide and racial division. Class division is more our thing. Religious division, perhaps also, albeit to a far lesser extent.
 
The media was basically the mouthpiece of the Bush administration from 9/11 to Katrina.

They were more chickenshit than they were today, just doing whatever Fox News does.
 
GOPpers gonna GOP.

dQL1pL1.png
 
To be a bit more concise, the UK has been monocultural for a long time. Racial division is a very, very recent phenomena. North America was built on genocide and racial division. Class division is more our thing. Religious division, perhaps also, albeit to a far lesser extent.

Its a good thing to see a European who understands why race relations are different in America vs Europe.
 
To be a bit more concise, the UK has been monocultural for a long time. Racial division is a very, very recent phenomena. North America was built on genocide and racial division. Class division is more our thing. Religious division, perhaps also, albeit to a far lesser extent.
There have been racial problems in Europe for decades, the difference now is that it can no longer be swept under the carpet, simply due to demographic shifts. It's no coincidence that every thread on European race issues here is dominated by an oblivious, ignorant group of young white European who "don't get it" no matter how blatant the issue is.
 
There have been racial problems in Europe for decades, the difference now is that it can no longer be swept under the carpet, simply due to demographic shifts. It's no coincidence that every thread on European race issues here is dominated by an oblivious, ignorant group of young white European who "don't get it" no matter how blatant the issue is.

The best part is the banana throwing soccer fans. "Its not that big of a deal guys!" Or how about the banning of religious symbols? "The crescent moon encourages extremism!"
 

War Peaceman

You're a big guy.
There have been racial problems in Europe for decades, the difference now is that it can no longer be swept under the carpet, simply due to demographic shifts. It's no coincidence that every thread on European race issues here is dominated by an oblivious, ignorant group of young white European who "don't get it" no matter how blatant the issue is.

Absolutely. There have been racial problems in Europe for centuries. Anti-semitism alone in Europe is ingrained from as early as the Black Death. Jews - as a group noticeably separated from 'society' - were often blamed and targeted for supposedly spreading or causing the plague. Regional lords in places like Switzerland or Austria would protect the Jews in their castle for as long as they could. Belgians were some of the most brutal groups in the race for Africa.

However the racial dynamic in central Europe still remains very different from the US (and the UK). Part of this will be to do with the local demographies but a large part will also be down to local insecurity. Dax (I think?) recently posted that map of the world over time - look at the instability in central/eastern Europe. Constant upheaval and destruction does hideous damage to the collective/national psyche.
 
There have been racial problems in Europe for decades, the difference now is that it can no longer be swept under the carpet, simply due to demographic shifts. It's no coincidence that every thread on European race issues here is dominated by an oblivious, ignorant group of young white European who "don't get it" no matter how blatant the issue is.

On one hand I can understand the fact they don't have a history of it, but their constant statements of "its different here!" we're not racist its just the culture doesn't fit! that's how racism manifests itself today.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom