How is the vitter language not a direct violation of the 27th amendment?
TOPEKA — Hundreds of millions of tax dollars for public schools are at stake in a lawsuit before the Kansas Supreme Court, but so is the core of Republican Gov. Sam Brownback’s vision for the state.
JOHN MILBURN | THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Brownback is banking on massive personal income tax cuts boosting the state’s economy, and his successful push for the reductions makes Kansas a lab for conservative fiscal ideas. But Brownback’s signature policy stands to unravel if aggrieved school districts and students pursuing the lawsuit succeed in forcing a dramatic increase in education spending.
The Supreme Court heard arguments from attorneys last week in the state’s appeal of a lower-court ruling that Kansas must increase its annual spending on aid to its public schools by at least $440 million. Projections from the Legislature’s research staff suggest the state can’t add so much new spending to its annual budgets with the income tax cuts in place.
“If the court orders a very large sum of money, it is very difficult to accommodate all of them,” Senate Majority Leader Terry Bruce, a Hutchinson Republican, said of the tax cuts, which he strongly favors.
Thirty students and the Wichita, Hutchinson, Dodge City and Kansas City, Kan., school districts sued the state, and their attorneys hope the Supreme Court agrees that legislators aren’t providing enough money to meet their responsibility under the Kansas Constitution to make “suitable provision” for financing schools.
The state has faced education funding lawsuits for more than 40 years, and the latest case was filed in 2010 – only 4 1/2 years after the last Kansas Supreme Court ruling on the subject. The state’s attorneys argued that the constitution gives legislators broad latitude in setting funding and lawmakers haven’t provided more money for schools because of the economic problems that arose during the Great Recession.
“This cycle of school finance litigation must end,” Brownback said in a statement last week. “It is the Legislature who has the power of the purse and they must decide how (to) solve this issue in the long run.”
But the three-judge panel that heard the lawsuit in Shawnee County District Court called the argument that legislators have done the best they could for schools “completely illogical,” given income tax reductions enacted under Brownback. Yet the tax cuts didn’t arise as an issue during the Supreme Court’s hearing until Alan Rupe, a Wichita attorney representing the students and school districts, raised it.
“I would put it in the `obvious’ category,” Rupe said afterward. “I got a sense that they’re aware of them (the tax cuts).”
The Legislature’s research staff projects that changes in the state’s tax laws will provide net reductions worth $540 million during the current fiscal year, with the annual figure exceeding $1 billion in fiscal 2018. But legislative researchers also project that the state’s cash reserves will dwindle over the next six years, so that before July 2019, the state would face a projected budget shortfall.
While the projections could allow modest increases in spending on aid to public schools and teacher pensions, increasing education funding as much as the lawsuit demands could create a projected shortfall by July 2015. Critics of the tax cuts championed by Brownback have described them as reckless.
“I think that he did everything he could to undercut us in every way possible,” said Lila Bartel, a retired English, social studies and gifted education teacher from Topeka. “Did it ever make sense to cut the income tax?”
Brownback and Republican legislators who backed the income tax cuts are confident the reductions will improve the state’s economy, create jobs and generate offsetting revenues to sustain schools. Brownback and his allies want to phase out personal income taxes to create what Brownback calls a “pro-growth” state.
The governor and his allies have repeatedly described his policies as a sharp break with the past – and Brownback has gained attention in national conservative circles for the reductions.
“The courts have the luxury of dealing with the (school funding) case in a vacuum, as if nothing else matters,” said former House Speaker Mike O'Neal, a strong backer of the tax cuts who’s now president and CEO of the powerful Kansas Chamber of Commerce. “For local schools to thrive and survive, they need a vibrant local economy.”
In past rulings, the Supreme Court has said the state constitution requires Kansas to provide each child with a suitable education. But in comments from the bench last week, several justices wondered whether they can set a clear legal standard and suggested they want to avoid perpetual litigation.
There’s also the question of how readily Brownback and the GOP-controlled Legislature would comply with a decision ordering a massive increase in spending.
Kansas Democratic Party Chairwoman Joan Wagnon, a former state revenue secretary who has strongly criticized the tax cuts, said for Brownback’s makeover of the state to remain on track, “He can’t have a piece out of his control.”
If the aggrieved students and school districts succeed in the lawsuit, she said, “They turn off the Bunsen burner under his grand experiment.”
It is, but No Budget, No Pay was too.
Don't worry, guys. The House bill is literally the Senate bill, plus stuff Dems said they would include in the Senate bill in return for GOP concessions, plus a small pay cut for members of Congress and the Cabinet. The mini-Vitter is basically the most meaningless amendment in the world. So the argument has come down to -- Democrats want a concession in return for the essentially irrelevant fig leafs, the House wants to see if it can get away with no concession. These bills are so close together that it's almost like normal negotiation.
Robert Costa ‏@robertcostaNRO 1m
RT @nielslesniewski The scheduled 11 a.m. Senate GOP meeting has been scratched. Senators will receive an update at the weekly lunch.
Oh for fuck's sake.Robert Costa ‏@robertcostaNRO 8m
Because the way the House GOP is running now, and given the internal politics, even THIS bill will have its challenges, let alone a Sen deal
House theocracy confirmed?Robert Costa ‏@robertcostaNRO 1m
Notes from HC-5... during fiscal cliff, Boehner reads Serenity Prayer. For October showdown, House sings Amazing Grace
ughRobert Costa ‏@robertcostaNRO 1m
RT @mkraju No McConnell speech on the floor this morning, after House GOP indicates it's asking for more
Oh for fuck's sake.
@robertcostanro said:RT @DavidMDrucker: One GOP source: @SpeakerBoehner bringing new House R plan to the floor w/out a whip check.
Oh for fuck's sake.
Time for stop dicking around and submit to the bipartisan will of the Senate kthxRobert Costa ‏@robertcostaNRO 32s
RT @russellberman After over an hour, staffers have been kicked out of the House GOP conference meeting. Time for heart-to-hearts
Jake Sherman @JakeSherman 44m
THE HOUSE BILL also turns off Treasury's extraordinary measures capability
Jake Sherman ‏@JakeSherman 53m
DETAILS FROM GOP BILL: debt ceiling till feb7, govt funding till jan 15. Medical device tax delay for 2yrs. Language canceling hc subsidies
Sherman is saying this:
Total non-starter if true, but Costa hasn't mentioned any of this (the extraordinary measures part and the cancelling of subsidies - HAHA - I mean).
@jaketapper 47m
House GOP proposal: diff version of members of Congress/administration having to use Obamacare exchanges-just for primaries not for staffers
@jaketapper 46m
Primaries = POTUS, VPOTUS, Cabinet official, members of Congress… Not their employees
No. No negotiation means no negotiation, unless Obama says it I guess. We default in a couple days. There isn't time for ping long bills. The House will either pass the senate bill or we default, period. Specifically, Boehner will put the bill on the floor and it will easily pass.Jake Tapper explaining how the House GOP updated the Vitter language:
At least it's a LITTLE less shitty, in that they're not totally fucking over their staff.
Get them to drop the fucking device tax delay and we're there, IMO.
No. No negotiation means no negotiation, unless Obama says it I guess. We default in a couple days. There isn't time for ping long bills. The House will either pass the senate bill or we default, period. Specifically, Boehner will put the bill on the floor and it will easily pass.
At least it's a LITTLE less shitty, in that they're not totally fucking over their staff.
A guy I do jiujitsu with is probably the most consistent Obama hater on my newsfeed. I figured I would share this with you guys, as he is 100% serious(It is very scary):
The plague? lol
I can't make this kind of stuff up.
Rawr, rawr fuck obama, he is worst than hitler and stalin combined!!!...btw see you at training tomorrow. This just seemed hilarious to me.
From White House Spokeswoman Amy Brundage:
The President has said repeatedly that Members of Congress dont get to demand ransom for fulfilling their basic responsibilities to pass a budget and pay the nations bills. Unfortunately, the latest proposal from House Republicans does just that in a partisan attempt to appease a small group of Tea Party Republicans who forced the government shutdown in the first place. Democrats and Republicans in the Senate have been working in a bipartisan, good-faith effort to end the manufactured crises that have already harmed American families and business owners. With only a couple days remaining until the United States exhausts its borrowing authority, its time for the House to do the same.
This is amusing.
Literally the only reason why this fight is still happening is so the GOP can figure out some kind of way to save face to the crazies in the party, right? It's only about optics right now, from what I can tell. They don't want to be perceived as having "lost" after shutting down the government and nearly defaulting.
Am I right here?
it's on... Obama changed his twitter avatar.
NYT saying house plan just collapsed?
@robertcostanro said:What's in the works now: adding FULL Vitter language to House plan, prob only way to get 218+
Apparently, Obama not buying it (the House bill that is):
NYT saying house plan just collapsed?
@daveweigel
Having spent two hours talking to House Republicans, my expert investment advice is: Short everything
Terrible advice. Better advice: Do nothing.
On the Senate floor Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) flatly rejected the House GOP's latest plan to re-open the government and increase the debt limit.
"It's a plan to advance an extreme piece of legislation, and it's nothing more than a blatant attack on bipartisanship," Reid said. "The House legislation will not pass the Senate. I am very disappointed with John Boehner, who would once again try to preserve his role at the expense of the country."
The House Republican plan seems to be in flux after failing to attract enough conservative support during the GOP conference's morning meeting.
I posted a while ago saying this is hail mary pass from boehner and its doa. But the post never appeared for weird reason
Love how Reid is openly mocking how vulnerable Boehner's Speakership is." I am very disappointed with John Boehner, who would once again try to preserve his role at the expense of the country."
I agree he was a pretty terrible president.21 Reasons JFK Was Actually A Conservative
http://www.buzzfeed.com/irastoll/21-ways-jfk-was-actually-a-conservative-fjkq
any of yall agree with some of these points?