• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT| Ask us about our performance with Latinos in Nevada

Status
Not open for further replies.

Yoda

Member
I think devaluation of other vocations and credential elitism mentality in the US is probably a part. So I could see investing in other job paths as good.

On the whole though, I just don't particularly see how someone spending 8 years to struggle through or drop out of a liberal arts degree is of benefit to society or that individual. And I don't see how it being free fixes that. I am probably in the minority opinion though.

For better or worse, we've stigmatized those who don't attend higher education. It's harder to get hired w/o a College level degree, it'll be harder to network for new opportunities, and if you have a degree, if it isn't from a flagship state school, highly ranked private college or an ivy, chances are it's still abysmally hard to land a decent job/launch a career. It's in the governments interest to have a highly skilled workforce.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
He's threatening the party's chance in 2016

Gonna point out that picking "electable" candidates hasn't worked since 2000 for either side (Kerry in 04, McCain in 08 and Hilary in '08, Romney in '12). I am seeing shades of Dean vs Kerry in '04, including the "the people I hire may not know how to run a campaign, and the head of the DNC is an idiot" bit.

I mean, if a 74 year old self-admitted socialist is enough to threaten the Dems chances in Nov, that the party is in worse shape than I thought.

Gonna repeat my point about the fact that Sanders is even sniffing Clinton is the single greatest indictment of Clinton's poor campaigning, end of story.

I want Clinton to win, but I need her to give me a little more confidence that she knows what the hell she is doing campaign wise. (also, DWS being absolutely useless amplifies it all)
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Jeb! - See, Donald supported the failed invasion..uh I mean..he fuck.

This is what I expect the attack to look like :lol

Whoever tries to hit him with it is going to look like a big fat mess.

hoho, haha

not like it will make a difference to his supporters anyways, but good to see regardless - good ammo for the general

There's enough ammo that this one can stay in the clip and it'll still be overkill.
 
Cbi4V0FUkAA1-cF.jpg:large


yeeeesssss
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Cbi4V0FUkAA1-cF.jpg:large


yeeeesssss

Holy shit, that third one! :LOLOLOLOL

I mean the other issue is that credentialism is creeping. Everyone needs a bachelors. And then when everyone has a bachelors, then you'll need a masters to stand out. And then when everyone has a masters, time for everyone to get a PhD.

We're already almost to the point where you need a masters. Hell in some industries you can't get shit without it.
 
Jesus, Bernie answer the question.

Gonna point out that picking "electable" candidates hasn't worked since 2000 for either side (Kerry in 04, McCain in 08 and Hilary in '08, Romney in '12). I am seeing shades of Dean vs Kerry in '04, including the "the people I hire may not know how to run a campaign, and the head of the DNC is an idiot" bit.

Nor have unelectable, Goldwater, McGovern
 

kirblar

Member
Gonna point out that picking "electable" candidates hasn't worked since 2000 for either side (Kerry in 04, McCain in 08 and Hilary in '08, Romney in '12). I am seeing shades of Dean vs Kerry in '04, including the "the people I hire may not know how to run a campaign, and the head of the DNC is an idiot" bit.
I don't think "electability" had much to do with any of those. The GOP primaries worked for decades like Royal succession- it was McCain/Romney's "turn". Hillary is in that vein, which is why there's a lot of natural pushback from the Dems, who usually succeed with fresh faces. (Obama was clearly more electable in '08.) Kerry's nomination in '04 confused me to no end- and I say this as a Kerry fan- I thought he was pretty obviously a weak candidate and was shocked to see him win the nomination.
 
I use the VA in Salem Virginia, it took 3 weeks to see a doctor. He ordered an MRI for my back, it took 6 more weeks to get me in for that.
 
One thing I've noticed is that he's not really treating this like a town hall. Not being personal, or coming off friendly. He's stumping at a town hall, shouting his answers at people instead of to them. I knew something looked off.
 

kirblar

Member
The GOP succession process broke down this year with a lack of obvious candidates from last cycle, and many of their golden boys (Christie, McDonnell) beset by scandal, leaving a void Trump was able to exploit.
 
Da fuq is this.

Not sure exactly what he said but the premise isn't entirely wrong. Conservative groups and politicians used the discover that the VA was ran poorly to try and get its services privatized. The Ooch Borthers funded the campaigns and PACs that were running ads about doing it.
 
Holy shit, that third one! :LOLOLOLOL

We're already almost to the point where you need a masters. Hell in some industries you can't get shit without it.
Yes. In which case, does it become obligatory that society also provide for post-graduate education, and that people who simply don't have the aptitude or desire to enter such study should need to. This is really a more overarching mentality problem.
 

Jay-Hova

Banned
Why doesn't Bernie mention the Korean orphan scholarship he ran on for office in highschool and then helped to implement it even when he lost
Or voting to defend educational funds for prisoners?
Or his advocacy against imperalism in latin America/his trips there and other thing's he's done to defend the rights of workers?
Or any of the other positive thing's he's done in his career.
Why is he so bad at selling himself?
Bernie siding with Dixiecrats and Teapublicans in 2007 by voting against the immigration reform bill and by saying Obama should be primaried in 2012 are deal breakers for me.

I used to be neutral, but now I'm anti Bernie

The dude is using the Democratic Party when in the past he has trashed it on numerous occasions. Most of his supporters are not even Democrats, they're ideologues plain and simple who would rather watch it all "bern" down with President Trump or President Cruz at the helm.
Yes, Bernie is an evil man for not playing party politics.
Most of his supporters are people frustrated with the way they perceive democratic party has been treating then/the way their values have changed, and want to see a shift in how it operates, politics isn't a sport, it's supposed to be a vehicle for the will of the people to get what need's to be done done, and this vitrol against him for being an independent as if the democrats are infallible is just so strange to me.
The Democrats aren't above reproach, and you act as though his whole career all he's done is shit on the democrats and insult when that's clearly false.
Never mind the fact that he's already said he'll be getting behind Hilary if he loses the primary.
The number of Bernie supporters who'd want to see president Trump or so minute that it's not remotely worth discussion especially when you could say the same about Clinton supporters with Mccain in 08.
Also even if you disagree there are legitimate reasons for Bernie to have voted against that immigration reform bill, and he has a record of supporting immigrants regardless.
Do you go at Hilary for her support of bills that have leaned Republican like you're going at Bernie right now?
 
Why doesn't Bernie mention the Korean orphan scholarship he ran on for office in highschool and then helped to implement it even when he lost
Or voting to defend educational funds for prisoners?
Or his advocacy against imperalism in latin America/his trips there and other thing's he's done to defend the rights of workers?
Or any of the other positive thing's he's done in his career.
Why is he so bad at selling himself?

Yes, Bernie is an evil man for not playing party politics.
Most of his supporters are people frustrated with the way they perceive democratic party has been treating then/the way their values have changed, and want to see a shift in how it operates, politics isn't a sport, it's supposed to be a vehicle for the will of the people to get what need's to be done done, and this vitrol against him for being an independent as if the democrats are infallible is just so strange to me.
The Democrats aren't above reproach, and you act as though his whole career all he's done is shit on the democrats and insult when that's clearly false.
Never mind the fact that he's already said he'll be getting behind Hilary if he loses the primary.
The number of Bernie supporters who'd want to see president Trump or so minute that it's not remotely worth discussion especially when you could say the same about Clinton supporters with Mccain in 08.
Also even if you disagree there are legitimate reasons for Bernie to have voted against that immigration reform bill, and he has a record of supporting immigrants regardless.
Do you go at Hilary for her support of bills that have leaned Republican like you're going at Bernie right now?

It is a sport and the winning team enacts policy and does its will.
 
They've been licking his balls from day 1. Cenk is probably masturbating to every one of Sanders stump answers.

And he keeps going up in the polls. Kind of evident how his stump answers are working, no matter how tired those who follow politics closely are of them.
 

Cybit

FGC Waterboy
I mean the other issue is that credentialism is creeping, which I guess has an element of slippery slope fallacy admittedly - although it's borne out in reality. Everyone needs a bachelors. And then when everyone has a bachelors, then you'll need a masters to stand out. And then when everyone has a masters, time for everyone to get a PhD.

This is already happening in non-trade type of degrees.

Nor have unelectable, Goldwater, McGovern

Yeah, but note that the pendulum might have swung too hard the other way.

I don't think "electability" had much to do with any of those. The GOP primaries worked for decades like Royal succession- it was McCain/Romney's "turn". Hillary is in that vein, which is why there's a lot of natural pushback from the Dems, who usually succeed with fresh faces. (Obama was clearly more electable in '08.) Kerry's nomination in '04 confused me to no end- and I say this as a Kerry fan- I thought he was pretty obviously a weak candidate and was shocked to see him win the nomination.

I don't think it was McCain's turn as much as he would give the GOP some space away from GWB due to the 2000 fight, and that McCain was generally considered a moderate prior to the 2008 primaries. Obama ended up being more electable, but during the primary, HRC definitely used the "electable" bit, since Obama was a black guy. Romney was the same way, they ended up going for the most moderate GOP candidate they could find to try to be more "electable". I think firing up the base to actually vote is becoming quickly as effective of a way to go for electoral votes as is appealing to the center.

I guess I'm still frustrated that HRC hasn't ended this yet, her campaign is showing all the weaknesses it did in 08, and she's still hasn't figured out the authenticity thing yet. Does anyone think HRC would be beating Warren if it were Warren instead of Sanders?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom