cartoon_soldier
Member
Nate talking about Trump doing poorly with late-deciders.
The problem? He also did poorly with late-deciders in New Hampshire.
Yea, it just shows that Trump has a ceiling. Which is why the big field helps him a lot.
Nate talking about Trump doing poorly with late-deciders.
The problem? He also did poorly with late-deciders in New Hampshire.
Nate talking about Trump doing poorly with late-deciders.
The problem? He also did poorly with late-deciders in New Hampshire.
I saw that too.Debbie says super delegates are there for racial diversity.
While I haven't seen the actual demographic numbers how he performed with minorities in Nevada, I think you've already pointed out he could not have done well enough based on location results.They are not. This was Bernie's best chance to change the narrative that he can't win in non-white states. And getting close isn't good enough. It's a loss. He will get blown out in SC and on nearly every southern state on Super Tuesday. He had to do something to show nonwhite voters he could win. He didn't.
"And now on to Super Tuesday!"
Yeah, Bernie, aren't you forgetting something?
Well I'll eat crow and say I called Nevada wrong because I thought it'd go slightly Bernie.
I also said this seems like very bad news for Bernie's campaign because without Nevada I do not know what the next Bernie win will be at this point. My best guess is sometime in March at Michigan or Ohio or something and that's not good.
Considering the narrative as recent as Iowa was "he'll get blown out in NV and SC", Id say he closed the gap decently well. Obviously a win was ideal, but the results are encouraging.
Wasn't watching but did he actually just ignore South Carolina?
A win in South Carolina, coupled with a New Hampshire blowout and a second-place finish in Iowa, would establish Donald Trump as the front-runner for the GOP nomination.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/...arolina-gop-front-runner-219502#ixzz40ktAEC2k
(This is not why #ImWithHer)
But I just realized with some certainty that a major political party is going to nominate a woman at the top of their ticket.
It shouldn't feel monumental, but it does.
Not a big break for Rubio in late deciders, though early exit polls these are.
Not a big break for Rubio in late deciders, though early exit polls these are.
Minnesota, Massachusetts, Colorado and obviously Vermont
There are some favorable largely white caucus states. And New England is relatively fertile ground.Well I'll eat crow and say I called Nevada wrong because I thought it'd go slightly Bernie.
I also said this seems like very bad news for Bernie's campaign because without Nevada I do not know what the next Bernie win will be at this point. My best guess is sometime in March at Michigan or Ohio or something and that's not good.
My problem with the "late-deciders" poll is the lack of definition. How late is "late?"
Polls for Caucuses are useless. Who knows what lead he had or did not have, or vice versa for Hillary.
My understanding is in last week or so.
While I haven't seen the actual demographic numbers how he performed with minorities in Nevada, I think you've already pointed out he could not have done well enough based on location results.
This very well may have been his last chance to show he could swing minorities.
I was just about to post this. It should tell you something when most polling outfits skip the state.
Participation ribbon culture brah. It's why we don't have victories anymore.Hah, already hyping that third place Rubio finish as a win. Never drop out Jeb, you can't let Marco do this.
Were they all undecided in the polls?
Hah, already hyping that third place Rubio finish as a win. Never drop out Jeb, you can't let Marco do this.
Participation ribbon culture brah. It's why we don't have victories anymore.
Not a big break for Rubio in late deciders, though early exit polls these are.
No, few pages back you can see that 45% of voters were late deciders. So those 45% broke that way.
Too close to call. Uh oh
Steve Kornacki
‏@SteveKornacki
SC exit -- white evangelicals (69% of electorate):
Trump 31%
Cruz 28%
Rubio 23%
===
PLEEEEEEEEASE HOLD.
Who has lower energy Bush or Carson?
You can ask Carson when he wakes up from his nap.
Steve Kornacki
‏@SteveKornacki
SC exit -- white evangelicals (69% of electorate):
Trump 31%
Cruz 28%
Rubio 23%
===
PLEEEEEEEEASE HOLD.
How can 70% of the electorate be white evangelicals? Does evangelical mean anything besides "christian" anymore?
This is South Carolina. Where you drive past 30+ churches in a two hour drive to myrtle beach.