Trump doesn't need to revive it, he keeps it alive by retweeting white supremacists.
That's not what I'm talking about.
Trump doesn't need to revive it, he keeps it alive by retweeting white supremacists.
http://youtu.be/Xd22I12jY7c
Not a good look. I don't know how you don't have a good answer for that.
February surprise.
Hillary dun fucked up with that. They need to damage control that ASAP.
Don't defend that crap, the super predator was coded racist language, not to mention it's dehumanizing youth at risk.The girl in the video was wrong. She didn't call black people super predators. She called gang members super predators. It was during a time when violence and drug use was spiraling out of control.
Not sure it it's defending her or not, but I'm curious what Clinton would have said had the protester let her speak.
Serious question, what should she have done differently?
Those "Well, if you just let me talk" lines in that setting looked and sounded bad. Clinton did a good job trying to give her an answer, but there is enough there to make her look abrasive and petulant when the vid is cut up tomorrow morning for networks.Serious question, what should she have done differently?
The girl in the video was wrong. She didn't call black people super predators. She called gang members super predators. It was during a time when violence and drug use was spiraling out of control.
Exactly.
But that's not stopping a lot of young people from echoing that Hillary Clinton called all black men Superpredators.
Fortunately, a lot of Hillary's black support is older, and remembers the 90s. Particularly the early 90s.
Serious question, what should she have done differently?
http://youtu.be/Xd22I12jY7c
Not a good look. I don't know how you don't have a good answer for that.
Those "Well, if you just let me talk" lines in that setting looked and sounded bad. Clinton did a good job trying to give her an answer, but there is enough there to make her look abrasive and petulant when the vid is cut up tomorrow morning for networks.
I think the best play on this is to let the girl have her say, defer to her (it is an intimate setting, you don't need to command the room the way you do during a debate), and when she's done, try to answer her question. If she keeps interrupting (like she did here), just let her have her say.
Don't defend that crap, the super predator was coded racist language, not to mention it's dehumanizing youth at risk.
Now I don't think Hillary Clinton is a racist, but that tough on crime bullshit the Clintons pushed was very much intended to appeal to voters who were concerned about damn savage dark kids coming to murder them.
Now personally I don't think that's a huge deal when deciding who to vote for this election, like, the Clinton are political opportunists, they always were, but while you can pass moral judgment on that the fact that the pendulum swung completely to the other side on this issue (especially with democrats) means that if elected, she is likely to be on the right side of this issue.
I don't think Hillary did anything wrong in the video. Those types of interruptions, whether they're done by race activists or abortion activists, are meant to make the candidate look bad. You're not going to win. It's best to diffuse it and move on like nothing happened.
Obviously Hillary's record on the issue is bad. As others have said crime was high in the 90s and just as fear has lead to a demand for ridiculous action on ISIS today, similar fear led to ridiculous action on crime then. There was no sympathy for drug users either, as there is now that the abusers are white. The political climate demanded blood and they got it. Now the climate is different and Clinton has changed her position. But she's not the only one to do so.
Are you talking about me? I'm not talking about some shit Hillary said, I'm talking about a time when Hispanics and blacks were at each other's throats. And I'm not predicting success for Trump, I'm pointing out the strategy that his team has been foreshadowing. He's going to blame black economic struggles on illegal immigration and promise to be the first President that will do something about it.So Donald Trump is going to bring something that many Black voters already remember from 20 years ago to destroy the reputation of a candidate that already has huge support among that group and has a history(good or bad) with that group, and is going to have he backing of Obama. Donald Trump the one that is also a Republican and outright says vaguely racist things, and Black voters is going to trust him, a person they don't like?
Some people come to the dumbest conclusions.
I'm kind of surprised people manage to get past her Secret Service detail. That didn't look like an open event.
Are you talking about me? I'm not talking about some shit Hillary said, I'm talking about a time when Hispanics and Blacks were at each other's throats. And I'm not predicting success for Trump, I'm pointing out what his strategy will be.
Black communities were certainly concerned, I'm not doubting that, but the tough on crime (and law and order campaigns in general) was originally an appeal to white people who were afraid of the racial unrest of the 60s and 70s (thanks Nixon) and Bill Clinton's co-opting and one-upping it was a part of his triangulation strategy.I don't know how I feel about that.
I grew up in a large black family in South Central Los Angeles. I was a kid, too young to participate in discussion but old enough to have a vague understanding of what was going on around me. I remember the 1992 LA Riots and where I was (hiding under the seats of a pickup truck with my cousins while my mom and aunts raided a grocery store, thinking the whole thing was fun until we noticed people breaking windows). I remember my grandmother screaming at my mother for having us out in the middle of that. The riots were only a few years before Clinton, and there was still residual fear from the riots mixed in with the general fear of gang violence at that time. I remember my family talking about it; I remember my all-black church talking about it. There was a lot of fear back then, and it wasn't just white people.
I have my issues with Hillary using that term superpredator. Watching the speech, you see she was speaking specifically about gang-violence, and not black men in general. But I do wish she hadn't used that word, which was problematic even then.
There wasn't a notable Trump subreddit previously? That's sort of surprising given there's a sub for, well, everything.Reddit seems to be rapidly moving towards trump. /r/the_donald has gotten 15,000+ subscribers in the past 4 days and is the fastest growing non default subreddit by far. I wouldn't be surprised if by super tuesday it has 50,000 subscribers.
At least get the quote right!Can the next thread title be "PoliGAF 2016 |OT| I love uneducated people!"
PoliGAF 2016 |OT2| I love the poorly educated
Black communities were certainly concerned, I'm not doubting that, but the tough on crime (and law and order campaigns in general) was originally an appeal to white people who were afraid of the racial unrest of the 60s and 70s (thanks Nixon) and Bill Clinton's co-opting and one-upping it was a part of his triangulation strategy.
So while Clinton didn't wasn't racist and didn't mean to directly appeal to racist, these polices and that rhetoric was meant to attract white voters (I don't think that was part of the black voter outreach in any shape or form).
And again, I don't really hold that against the Clintons any more than I hold them responsible for triangulation in general (and I do, a whole lot actually), but we really should not pretend that this wasn't a toxic language that led to terrible terrible policies.
Man if I'm wrong on the Texas primaries it'll be by far my single biggest loss ever on PredictIt.
The early voting, the home field advantage, the three million volunteers all make me favor Cruz in an otherwise tie situation.
But the fact that it's an open primary, the fact that Cruz is tanking everywhere else and Trump is gaining momentum, gives me pause.
Don't let me down Ted.
And I can't believe that I actually want Rafael Eduardo Cruz to win anything but here we are.I can't believe we're talking about Cruz possibly losing Texas. What kind of world are we in?
Man if I'm wrong on the Texas primaries it'll be by far my single biggest loss ever on PredictIt.
The early voting, the home field advantage, the three million volunteers all make me favor Cruz in an otherwise tie situation.
But the fact that it's an open primary, the fact that Cruz is tanking everywhere else and Trump is gaining momentum, gives me pause.
Don't let me down Ted.
I'm not touching that market.
Question: who are the people still voting for Carson in primaries? Like I don't think I've encountered a single person (in real life or online) who's still supporting him. His campaign's obviously dead in the water, so why is he still getting a sizable chunk of the vote?
Question: who are the people still voting for Carson in primaries? Like I don't think I've encountered a single person (in real life or online) who's still supporting him. His campaign's obviously dead in the water, so why is he still getting a sizable chunk of the vote?
Gotta love those rural blue counties emanating from Vermont in the Northeast.
Massachusetts is the same way; political lean is largely a function of population density, except for the parts adjacent to Vermont. Rural as hell, liberal as hell.
Question: who are the people still voting for Carson in primaries? Like I don't think I've encountered a single person (in real life or online) who's still supporting him. His campaign's obviously dead in the water, so why is he still getting a sizable chunk of the vote?
You can't compare state politics and national politics like that. California's had numerous republican governors, could Trump carry it????
Hillary nominating Bill ought to do itBesides Barack Obama, what realistic Supreme Court nominee would inflict the most anguish on Republicans next year?
Is there a historical reason for Vermont being rural and extremely Liberal ? That's not exactly a normal combination (there a few areas like that in Australia basically old hippies and yuppies looking for a tree change but they aren't even large city sized).
Question: who are the people still voting for Carson in primaries? Like I don't think I've encountered a single person (in real life or online) who's still supporting him. His campaign's obviously dead in the water, so why is he still getting a sizable chunk of the vote?
The optics of that video are what look bad. Private event, rich white people, hissing, etc.
Reduced to begging Rand fucking Paul!In the lead-up to Super Tuesday, Cruz is seeking other ways to reinforce his Southern credentials. In recent weeks, he has been aggressively appealing to Rand Paul for an endorsement. Yet three sources close to the Kentucky senator said Paul had rebuffed Cruz, saying that he had no intention to endorse anyone anytime soon. A Cruz spokesperson declined to comment.
She offered to discuss it later with them but they did not want to? Like what was their goal from this other than to have exactly this kind of video.