Would have been bigger if we didn't tell them about it
/sensible chuckle
Would have been bigger if we didn't tell them about it
Al Gore!!They could also send a surrogate up to Alaska (whoever has the highest approval data up there, I guess?).
Even if Hillary loses there, the idea of a competitive Alaska just makes me grin like a kid. I'd love to see a campaign speech with a great wilderness backdrop. It'd make for a pretty attention-grabbing image on TV, as well.
idk I love the idea of having to send Trump to Alaska in October.
So do we know how many more emails does Wikileaks have? I feel like Goldman Sachs stuff was the money shot and there's not many bombs left.
He'd be perfect, actually. Climate change is impacting AK at a rate far faster than the rest of the US.Al Gore!!
I kind of wish someone would hack Trump at the last minute and release some horribly damning shit. Not in the sense that I think it'd be good, but in the sense that it'd be nice.
So this was graffitid on the NC GOP office
Could be just me but it's way too forward. Anyway, we will have security cam footage if someone stayed there to paint that.
Hillary's election night victory music should be The Greatest.
I got stamina~
It's unusual for people who are anti-racism to use a swastika in their messaging, but as we've seen in these threads it's also unusual for trump supporters to be able to correctly draw a swastika (instead of some weird backwards 'Z' thing).
Decent letter Spacing though... although there's multiple 'A' styles in use (compare the 'A' in Nazi to the 'A' in Republican).
Yes, the public poll having her down by 5.5 and the GOP internal poll having her down by 3 is all part of this same ruse to get Hillary to spend in Alaska.
Not even half way done.50,000 I think? There are tons left.
Edit: 50K total, so like 38K left.
Unless there's a credible poll showing her ahead, it makes no sense to invest in Alaska with so many other states in play.
Hell she shouldn't spend time or money in Utah, nevermind Alaska. Can't believe people think she has a chance in Utah lol.
They should only be spending money on the states that Obama won in 2012 and 2008. That's all it takes to win, the rest is fluff.
They should only be spending money on the states that Obama won in 2012 and 2008. That's all it takes to win, the rest is fluff.
If a Democrat is responsible for that fire bombing, I'll be so utterly disappointed. With the dangerous rhetoric coming from Trump and then something like this on top of it. If it was an anti-Republican attack, they couldn't have done anything worse for their cause, aside from actually killing someone and they ratcheted up the potential for more violence.
I want a blow out. Invest away.
I realize the polls currently show that she shouldn't waste her time in the state, but would it make sense for Bill to spend some time in Arkansas?
They should only be spending money on the states that Obama won in 2012 and 2008. That's all it takes to win, the rest is fluff.
You'll never expand the Democratic map doing this. In 2020, you'll be telling people to stop spending money on any state that Hillary didn't win.
I say spend away. You got the cash on hand, start throwing it around. Send Gore up there. I asked before, and I don't think someone answered (this was like 2 OTs ago): what are the politics like in Alaska? I'm basically asking is it super focused on Anchorage, and maybe stuff like what industries are more politically active and prevalent. If a Dem did try to win there, what's the win condition? E.G. in Georgia, it's about driving up your vote share in the Atlanta suburbs. What do you target in Alaska?
If a Democrat is responsible for that fire bombing, I'll be so utterly disappointed. With the dangerous rhetoric coming from Trump and then something like this on top of it. If it was an anti-Republican attack, they couldn't have done anything worse for their cause, aside from actually killing someone and they ratcheted up the potential for more violence.
Also, like, it's quite likely at this point that the Democratic nominee in 2024 probably won't spend any time in Iowa or Ohio.
You'll never expand the Democratic map doing this. In 2020, you'll be telling people to stop spending money on any state that Hillary didn't win.
I say spend away. You got the cash on hand, start throwing it around. Send Gore up there. I asked before, and I don't think someone answered (this was like 2 OTs ago): what are the politics like in Alaska? I'm basically asking is it super focused on Anchorage, and maybe stuff like what industries are more politically active and prevalent. If a Dem did try to win there, what's the win condition? E.G. in Georgia, it's about driving up your vote share in the Atlanta suburbs. What do you target in Alaska?
No, this is wrong. Ultimately, there are states that Obama won in 08 and 12 that are trending red, and it's important to build up infrastructure in states like Arizona, Georgia, Texas, Montana, and Alaska that could prove useful in 2020/2024. Especially if Montana gets an extra EV for the 2024 election.
I agree.
Might as well burn money.
No, it's solid R. And the Democratic party today is not the Dem party that got him elected.
Is that likely? I found this map from January 2015:
(source: http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/updated-2020-reapportionment-projections/)
We need Texas to go blue by 2024. Of course, who knows what the political parties will be like by then.
Figured. The idealist in me wants Hillary to campaign in solid red states, but I get that we're not in 20 point blowout territory yet. I wonder how Arkansans would react to Bill telling them "I know you're better than this" or something along those lines.
Well the only difference is, she's going to be at the debate soon which counts and then some, plus I'm sure she'll make an appearance shortly after that. I do understand though, it's not the best strategy to disappear after you have a good round of polling, as we saw post convention. However the difference is people are really starting to make up their minds and Donald's campaign is basically imploding. She doesn't really have to put herself out there a lot like she should have after the convention, not to mention her surrogates are really doing a good job for her, and I'm sure we're going to see more of her in the coming days after the debate.It kind of didn't work! So this is risky.
Is that likely? I found this map from January 2015:
(source: http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/updated-2020-reapportionment-projections/)
We need Texas to go blue by 2024. Of course, who knows what the political parties will be like by then.
Figured. The idealist in me wants Hillary to campaign in solid red states, but I get that we're not in 20 point blowout territory yet. I wonder how Arkansans would react to Bill telling them "I know you're better than this" or something along those lines.
Also, like, it's quite likely at this point that the Democratic nominee in 2024 probably won't spend any time in Iowa or Ohio.
I mentioned this in chat a few minutes ago.
My mom's been killing it with phone banking. I actually got her to stay on script, and she's making her way through a fuck ton of calls. She even managed to talk two other older women into volunteering for Hillary.
But, last night, the fiance and I finally figured out our schedule of when we could go vote. So, we told her we'd go on Wednesday. And she just got really, really quiet (which is rare) and just kinda sat there and said "I'm going to vote for the first woman who will become President."
And it was actually super emotional. I think there are a lot of women, particularly of a certain age, who are going through something very similar. This is, literally, the first time in my mom's entire life where she volunteered or gave money to a candidate.
Going to be emotional, man.
Eh, Alaska is only 3 EVs, its really only worth campaigning there for the down ballot and this year I seriously doubt Murkowski or Youing are going to lose. I'd rather Democrats focus on GOTV and voter registration in a state like that so they can build a base for future elections.
And Utah isn't close because of a trend towards Democrats, its because Trump is incredibly disliked there. Next election I imagine Utah will reset back to 2008-2012 numbers.
I do think Hilary Clinton should campaign hard in Georgia, Arizona, and South Carolina as those states are trending blue and a good effort now makes that transition quicker. Basically focus on states where efforts now will be felt into the future.
No, this is wrong. Ultimately, there are states that Obama won in 08 and 12 that are trending red, and it's important to build up infrastructure in states like Arizona, Georgia, Texas, Montana, and Alaska that could prove useful in 2020/2024. Especially if Montana gets an extra EV for the 2024 election.
Iraqi forces are starting the offensive to take back Mosul, they definitely will take it back.
I highly doubt this will affect the election because fear of terrorism isn't based on reality.
Montana doesn't make sense demographically as one of the states they should be targeting.
Billy Bush, who has arguably had a bigger impact on the election than his cousin Jeb, whom many Republicans expected to win it, then spots an attractive television actor awaiting Mr Trump. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her, says the Republican nominee, silky smooth. When youre a star they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.
I'm not sure anyone seriously entertained the thought that Hillary could win Utah. It was more so that the race there could end up close enough to raise a serious eyebrow.I noticed 538 dropped Hillary down in Utah. 4.3% right now when I think they had here around 15% or so last week when McMullin was trending and said to be taking votes from Trump. Is Utah still thought to be a potential Hillary win or not looking like it now?
FORT DEFIANCE, Ariz. ― Living among the red-rock gullies and the desert scrub in this corner of the country are a people who could soon exact their revenge on Donald Trump.
Because while the Republican presidential nominee appears to have forgotten about Native Americans of late, with his focus on Muslims and Mexicans, Arizona’s hundreds of thousands of Native Americans have not forgotten about him.
“I heard it for a long time, how he talks about Indians,” said Dennis Tsinnijinnie, 69 and among the first to cast his ballot on the sunny but brisk opening morning of Arizona’s early vote period last week.
Tsinnijinnie was talking about Trump’s behavior from decades ago, when he accused some Native Americans of faking their ethnicities to win casino licenses. When he disparaged tribes for receiving federal money for roads. When he mocked their sovereignty. And, more recently, when he insulted Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) with the epithet “Pocahontas.”
“We have a saying in Navajo that you may not have a lady for a leader,” said Judy Allen, 69, who drove a full hour from her home to vote on the first day possible. “However, today is a new day. The world has changed.”
Jamescita Mae Peshlakai, the Democratic candidate for state senate for northeastern Arizona, said she even finds Trump’s slogan offensive. “Make America great again?” she asks. “There was an even greater America before 1492.”
On a cubicle wall in the Coconino County elections office in downtown Flagstaff is a map showing all the polling places overseen by County Recorder Patty Hansen. Among them is the precinct at the bottom of the Grand Canyon.
There, 129 registered voters of the Havasupai nation have their ballots and voting machine helicoptered in prior to Election Day. The three poll workers who staff the voting site, though, can’t use the chopper. “They hike down the Monday before,” Hansen said. “They hike out the Wednesday after.”
Another polling place north of the canyon can only be accessed by a road that comes down from Utah, Hansen added.
Geography is just one of the challenges in accommodating Native American voters. Language is another. Many of the older tribe members speak and read little or no English, Hansen said, making a mail-in ballot impractical. “If you need language assistance, you can’t mail an interpreter,” she said.
And because the Native American languages themselves are oral, not written, translating some of the ballot wording can itself be an adventure. One of Arizona’s initiatives in November, for example, would legalize marijuana for recreational use. There is no Navajo word for marijuana, Hansen said, so it’s translated as “The smoke that makes you crazy.”
Hansen’s Coconino County, of course, is just one of Arizona’s fifteen counties, which in all are home to some 300,000 Native Americans ― making it the state with the second-largest native population in the country, after Oklahoma.
That number is not even 5 percent of the state’s 6.8 million people, and a fraction of the 2 million Latinos ― the vast majority of Mexican heritage. But the Clinton campaign and the state Democrats have nevertheless focused on registering and turning out as many of the 200,000 voting-age Native Americans in Arizona as possible. They know that over 90 percent have voted Democratic in past elections, with the potential for that percentage going even higher with Trump at the top of the ticket.
Nailing down precise numbers, though, is not easy. Arizona does not track ethnicity on its voter registration forms. Many Native Americans work in cities and towns off the reservations, but keep a permanent address on one. And addresses on reservations don’t necessarily have street numbers. In fact, registration forms allow voters to locate their homes by drawing a map of nearby landmarks ― an intersection, say, or even a large boulder.