• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2016 |OT13| For Queen and Country

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zukkoyaki

Member
They could also send a surrogate up to Alaska (whoever has the highest approval data up there, I guess?).

Even if Hillary loses there, the idea of a competitive Alaska just makes me grin like a kid. I'd love to see a campaign speech with a great wilderness backdrop. It'd make for a pretty attention-grabbing image on TV, as well.
Al Gore!!
 
So do we know how many more emails does Wikileaks have? I feel like Goldman Sachs stuff was the money shot and there's not many bombs left.
 
I kind of wish someone would hack Trump at the last minute and release some horribly damning shit. Not in the sense that I think it'd be good, but in the sense that it'd be nice.
 
I think that a Hillary rally in Salt Lake City, Phoenix, or Atlanta would get her best turnout numbers, and generate a ton of press. I expect she'll do one before this election is over.
 

shiba5

Member
I'd love to see a demographic breakdown of people who hate Hillary. My mom and MiL are both 70 and hate her; won't vote for her. "She's a liar and a thief." Those are the exact words from both of them. When I ask why she's a thief, they have no answer. I have no idea what the thief part is referring to.
I lived through the Ken Starr impeachment blah blah blah too, but I have a totally different view of her.

Edit: So I'm pretty open about how I manipulate my relatives so I planted the idea in my MiL's head that Hillary looks a lot like my mom - which she does. It's impossible to hate my mom.
Yeah... I'm horrible. >:)
 
I do really hope they find the people responsible for the bombing ASAP because we're going to have an endless argument about Democrats vs conspiracy theories until then.

In fact, since I'm a terrible person I'll add to that. That's not a D-style calling card that I've ever heard of, especially with the odd painted threat. Actually, Democrats are usually too lazy for violence (not that that's bad). On the other hand, this is a heavily D area near UNC and the races in NC haven't been extremely heated. A short-term burst of anger doesn't have a political affiliation. So! Suspects: Everybody. Codeword "animals" from Trump is probably just as dangerous as the actual attack, given thankfully no one was injured.

Has anyone known of any other attacks on GOP property like this? Anywhere? Or this tag ever used as a threat before?
Al Gore!!
He'd be perfect, actually. Climate change is impacting AK at a rate far faster than the rest of the US.
 

lyrick

Member
So this was graffitid on the NC GOP office

16-NC-GOP-office-firebombed-spray-paint.w710.h473.2x.jpg


Could be just me but it's way too forward. Anyway, we will have security cam footage if someone stayed there to paint that.

It's unusual for people who are anti-racism to use a swastika in their messaging, but as we've seen in these threads it's also unusual for trump supporters to be able to correctly draw a swastika (instead of some weird backwards 'Z' thing).

Decent letter Spacing though... although there's multiple 'A' styles in use (compare the 'A' in Nazi to the 'A' in Republican) and the 'N's don't look consistent either..
 
It's unusual for people who are anti-racism to use a swastika in their messaging, but as we've seen in these threads it's also unusual for trump supporters to be able to correctly draw a swastika (instead of some weird backwards 'Z' thing).

Decent letter Spacing though... although there's multiple 'A' styles in use (compare the 'A' in Nazi to the 'A' in Republican).

I wouldn't be surprised if a college student did it. They went through the trouble of ending the statement with a period.
 
Yes, the public poll having her down by 5.5 and the GOP internal poll having her down by 3 is all part of this same ruse to get Hillary to spend in Alaska.

Unless there's a credible poll showing her ahead, it makes no sense to invest in Alaska with so many other states in play.

Hell she shouldn't spend time or money in Utah, nevermind Alaska. Can't believe people think she has a chance in Utah lol.
 

NeoXChaos

Member
Unless there's a credible poll showing her ahead, it makes no sense to invest in Alaska with so many other states in play.

Hell she shouldn't spend time or money in Utah, nevermind Alaska. Can't believe people think she has a chance in Utah lol.

I want a blow out. Invest away.
 

Magni

Member
I realize the polls currently show that she shouldn't waste her time in the state, but would it make sense for Bill to spend some time in Arkansas?
 
If a Democrat is responsible for that fire bombing, I'll be so utterly disappointed. With the dangerous rhetoric coming from Trump and then something like this on top of it. If it was an anti-Republican attack, they couldn't have done anything worse for their cause, aside from actually killing someone and they ratcheted up the potential for more violence.
 
They should only be spending money on the states that Obama won in 2012 and 2008. That's all it takes to win, the rest is fluff.

No, this is wrong. Ultimately, there are states that Obama won in 08 and 12 that are trending red, and it's important to build up infrastructure in states like Arizona, Georgia, Texas, Montana, and Alaska that could prove useful in 2020/2024. Especially if Montana gets an extra EV for the 2024 election.

If a Democrat is responsible for that fire bombing, I'll be so utterly disappointed. With the dangerous rhetoric coming from Trump and then something like this on top of it. If it was an anti-Republican attack, they couldn't have done anything worse for their cause, aside from actually killing someone and they ratcheted up the potential for more violence.

I agree.
 
They should only be spending money on the states that Obama won in 2012 and 2008. That's all it takes to win, the rest is fluff.

You'll never expand the Democratic map doing this. In 2020, you'll be telling people to stop spending money on any state that Hillary didn't win.

I say spend away. You got the cash on hand, start throwing it around. Send Gore up there. I asked before, and I don't think someone answered (this was like 2 OTs ago): what are the politics like in Alaska? I'm basically asking is it super focused on Anchorage, and maybe stuff like what industries are more politically active and prevalent. If a Dem did try to win there, what's the win condition? E.G. in Georgia, it's about driving up your vote share in the Atlanta suburbs. What do you target in Alaska?
 
Also, like, it's quite likely at this point that the Democratic nominee in 2024 probably won't spend any time in Iowa or Ohio.

You'll never expand the Democratic map doing this. In 2020, you'll be telling people to stop spending money on any state that Hillary didn't win.

I say spend away. You got the cash on hand, start throwing it around. Send Gore up there. I asked before, and I don't think someone answered (this was like 2 OTs ago): what are the politics like in Alaska? I'm basically asking is it super focused on Anchorage, and maybe stuff like what industries are more politically active and prevalent. If a Dem did try to win there, what's the win condition? E.G. in Georgia, it's about driving up your vote share in the Atlanta suburbs. What do you target in Alaska?

Basically, it's flipping Anchorage and finding 40,000 more Democrats and driving up turnout of Inuits.
 

Sibylus

Banned
If a Democrat is responsible for that fire bombing, I'll be so utterly disappointed. With the dangerous rhetoric coming from Trump and then something like this on top of it. If it was an anti-Republican attack, they couldn't have done anything worse for their cause, aside from actually killing someone and they ratcheted up the potential for more violence.

My money is on a Twitter Tankie
charm_hush.gif
 
Also, like, it's quite likely at this point that the Democratic nominee in 2024 probably won't spend any time in Iowa or Ohio.

I think this is definitely true for Iowa. That's a state that's been the opposite of Virginia, and I don't see that changing. Need to replace it in the blue column, and I'd love to do that with either AZ or GA.
 

NeoXChaos

Member
You'll never expand the Democratic map doing this. In 2020, you'll be telling people to stop spending money on any state that Hillary didn't win.

I say spend away. You got the cash on hand, start throwing it around. Send Gore up there. I asked before, and I don't think someone answered (this was like 2 OTs ago): what are the politics like in Alaska? I'm basically asking is it super focused on Anchorage, and maybe stuff like what industries are more politically active and prevalent. If a Dem did try to win there, what's the win condition? E.G. in Georgia, it's about driving up your vote share in the Atlanta suburbs. What do you target in Alaska?

yeah. How are our states MS, LA, AL going to become the next GA, VA, NC without investment. There is a large AA population and emerging White millennial population that will one day if they don't move for greener job pastures make us purple when the older gen dies.
 

Magni

Member
No, this is wrong. Ultimately, there are states that Obama won in 08 and 12 that are trending red, and it's important to build up infrastructure in states like Arizona, Georgia, Texas, Montana, and Alaska that could prove useful in 2020/2024. Especially if Montana gets an extra EV for the 2024 election.

I agree.

Is that likely? I found this map from January 2015:
GVS2015012902-map1%20(small).png

(source: http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/updated-2020-reapportionment-projections/)

We need Texas to go blue by 2024. Of course, who knows what the political parties will be like by then.

Might as well burn money.


No, it's solid R. And the Democratic party today is not the Dem party that got him elected.

Figured. The idealist in me wants Hillary to campaign in solid red states, but I get that we're not in 20 point blowout territory yet. I wonder how Arkansans would react to Bill telling them "I know you're better than this" or something along those lines.
 

NeoXChaos

Member
Is that likely? I found this map from January 2015:
GVS2015012902-map1%20(small).png

(source: http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/updated-2020-reapportionment-projections/)

We need Texas to go blue by 2024. Of course, who knows what the political parties will be like by then.



Figured. The idealist in me wants Hillary to campaign in solid red states, but I get that we're not in 20 point blowout territory yet. I wonder how Arkansans would react to Bill telling them "I know you're better than this" or something along those lines.

A lot of the people who voted for Bill in 92 and 96 were from the Silent Generation and are mostly dead at this point. Whose left in the state likely now are R's who have voted Reagan on up. They make up a majority of the vote now. That goes for all the Southern states he won except for MS and AL which he did not win probably due to a much more polarizing electorate.

Also MS and AL were states first to rapidly become Republican starting in 1980 that TN, LA, KY, AR, WV etc didn't catch up until the 90's and recently
 

Diablos

Member
It kind of didn't work! So this is risky.
Well the only difference is, she's going to be at the debate soon which counts and then some, plus I'm sure she'll make an appearance shortly after that. I do understand though, it's not the best strategy to disappear after you have a good round of polling, as we saw post convention. However the difference is people are really starting to make up their minds and Donald's campaign is basically imploding. She doesn't really have to put herself out there a lot like she should have after the convention, not to mention her surrogates are really doing a good job for her, and I'm sure we're going to see more of her in the coming days after the debate.
 
Is that likely? I found this map from January 2015:
GVS2015012902-map1%20(small).png

(source: http://www.centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/articles/updated-2020-reapportionment-projections/)

We need Texas to go blue by 2024. Of course, who knows what the political parties will be like by then.



Figured. The idealist in me wants Hillary to campaign in solid red states, but I get that we're not in 20 point blowout territory yet. I wonder how Arkansans would react to Bill telling them "I know you're better than this" or something along those lines.

Potentially. MT-AL has the most votes-per-CD of any CD in the country, and they're always on the precipice of getting another CD. I believe it's projected to have 1,076,000 people in 2020. That'll be close. The state thinks they're getting another CD, but we'll see.
 
Eh, Alaska is only 3 EVs, its really only worth campaigning there for the down ballot and this year I seriously doubt Murkowski or Youing are going to lose. I'd rather Democrats focus on GOTV and voter registration in a state like that so they can build a base for future elections.

And Utah isn't close because of a trend towards Democrats, its because Trump is incredibly disliked there. Next election I imagine Utah will reset back to 2008-2012 numbers.

I do think Hilary Clinton should campaign hard in Georgia, Arizona, and South Carolina as those states are trending blue and a good effort now makes that transition quicker. Basically focus on states where efforts now will be felt into the future.
 

Cerium

Member
Also, like, it's quite likely at this point that the Democratic nominee in 2024 probably won't spend any time in Iowa or Ohio.

I don't agree, the Midwestern states have a certain type of candidate they like and neither Hillary nor Trump is it. They like plainspoken folksy people with a sunny disposition, which is why Obama did so well with them, especially against Romney. I think Tim Kaine could do well there.
 

ampere

Member
I mentioned this in chat a few minutes ago.

My mom's been killing it with phone banking. I actually got her to stay on script, and she's making her way through a fuck ton of calls. She even managed to talk two other older women into volunteering for Hillary.

But, last night, the fiance and I finally figured out our schedule of when we could go vote. So, we told her we'd go on Wednesday. And she just got really, really quiet (which is rare) and just kinda sat there and said "I'm going to vote for the first woman who will become President."

And it was actually super emotional. I think there are a lot of women, particularly of a certain age, who are going through something very similar. This is, literally, the first time in my mom's entire life where she volunteered or gave money to a candidate.

Going to be emotional, man.

Aw. This was nice to read

I'm excited about voting tomorrow! I still need to read up on some of the ballot issues though so I'm not a terrible clueless voter
 
Eh, Alaska is only 3 EVs, its really only worth campaigning there for the down ballot and this year I seriously doubt Murkowski or Youing are going to lose. I'd rather Democrats focus on GOTV and voter registration in a state like that so they can build a base for future elections.

And Utah isn't close because of a trend towards Democrats, its because Trump is incredibly disliked there. Next election I imagine Utah will reset back to 2008-2012 numbers.

I do think Hilary Clinton should campaign hard in Georgia, Arizona, and South Carolina as those states are trending blue and a good effort now makes that transition quicker. Basically focus on states where efforts now will be felt into the future.

Young actually could lose because he's so fucking crazy. I believe he has an opponent that the DCCC really likes, but I haven't seen any polling there. If we take back the House, it's through seats like AK-AL.
 
I wonder if we'd score a Democrat representative out of Montana having two districts. I have no idea what the geographical breakdown is like in MT, maybe someone could look at how the districts were drawn before and see how the halves voted in recent elections.
 
No, this is wrong. Ultimately, there are states that Obama won in 08 and 12 that are trending red, and it's important to build up infrastructure in states like Arizona, Georgia, Texas, Montana, and Alaska that could prove useful in 2020/2024. Especially if Montana gets an extra EV for the 2024 election.

Montana doesn't make sense demographically as one of the states they should be targeting.
 

ZealousD

Makes world leading predictions like "The sun will rise tomorrow"
Iraqi forces are starting the offensive to take back Mosul, they definitely will take it back.

I highly doubt this will affect the election because fear of terrorism isn't based on reality.

People actually trust Clinton on terrorism more than Trump.
 
Montana doesn't make sense demographically as one of the states they should be targeting.

The west in general is becoming more Democratic-leaning and there's an argument that the rise of Missoula/Western MT as more of an political force in the state makes it a bit tantalizing.
 
I know the TrumpTapes story is a bit old, but I just wanted to share this shade from The Economist:

Billy Bush, who has arguably had a bigger impact on the election than his cousin Jeb, whom many Republicans expected to win it, then spots an attractive television actor awaiting Mr Trump. “I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her,” says the Republican nominee, silky smooth. “When you’re a star they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.”
 

Futureman

Member
I noticed 538 dropped Hillary down in Utah. 4.3% right now when I think they had here around 15% or so last week when McMullin was trending and said to be taking votes from Trump. Is Utah still thought to be a potential Hillary win or not looking like it now?
 

Zukkoyaki

Member
I noticed 538 dropped Hillary down in Utah. 4.3% right now when I think they had here around 15% or so last week when McMullin was trending and said to be taking votes from Trump. Is Utah still thought to be a potential Hillary win or not looking like it now?
I'm not sure anyone seriously entertained the thought that Hillary could win Utah. It was more so that the race there could end up close enough to raise a serious eyebrow.
 
On the Native American vote in AZ:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...ona_us_5802f2dfe4b06e0475954a71?3vkzcuxdh1tt9

FORT DEFIANCE, Ariz. ― Living among the red-rock gullies and the desert scrub in this corner of the country are a people who could soon exact their revenge on Donald Trump.

Because while the Republican presidential nominee appears to have forgotten about Native Americans of late, with his focus on Muslims and Mexicans, Arizona’s hundreds of thousands of Native Americans have not forgotten about him.

“I heard it for a long time, how he talks about Indians,” said Dennis Tsinnijinnie, 69 and among the first to cast his ballot on the sunny but brisk opening morning of Arizona’s early vote period last week.

Tsinnijinnie was talking about Trump’s behavior from decades ago, when he accused some Native Americans of faking their ethnicities to win casino licenses. When he disparaged tribes for receiving federal money for roads. When he mocked their sovereignty. And, more recently, when he insulted Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) with the epithet “Pocahontas.”

“We have a saying in Navajo that you may not have a lady for a leader,” said Judy Allen, 69, who drove a full hour from her home to vote on the first day possible. “However, today is a new day. The world has changed.”

Jamescita Mae Peshlakai, the Democratic candidate for state senate for northeastern Arizona, said she even finds Trump’s slogan offensive. “Make America great again?” she asks. “There was an even greater America before 1492.”

On a cubicle wall in the Coconino County elections office in downtown Flagstaff is a map showing all the polling places overseen by County Recorder Patty Hansen. Among them is the precinct at the bottom of the Grand Canyon.

There, 129 registered voters of the Havasupai nation have their ballots and voting machine helicoptered in prior to Election Day. The three poll workers who staff the voting site, though, can’t use the chopper. “They hike down the Monday before,” Hansen said. “They hike out the Wednesday after.”

Another polling place north of the canyon can only be accessed by a road that comes down from Utah, Hansen added.

Geography is just one of the challenges in accommodating Native American voters. Language is another. Many of the older tribe members speak and read little or no English, Hansen said, making a mail-in ballot impractical. “If you need language assistance, you can’t mail an interpreter,” she said.

And because the Native American languages themselves are oral, not written, translating some of the ballot wording can itself be an adventure. One of Arizona’s initiatives in November, for example, would legalize marijuana for recreational use. There is no Navajo word for marijuana, Hansen said, so it’s translated as “The smoke that makes you crazy.”

Hansen’s Coconino County, of course, is just one of Arizona’s fifteen counties, which in all are home to some 300,000 Native Americans ― making it the state with the second-largest native population in the country, after Oklahoma.

That number is not even 5 percent of the state’s 6.8 million people, and a fraction of the 2 million Latinos ― the vast majority of Mexican heritage. But the Clinton campaign and the state Democrats have nevertheless focused on registering and turning out as many of the 200,000 voting-age Native Americans in Arizona as possible. They know that over 90 percent have voted Democratic in past elections, with the potential for that percentage going even higher with Trump at the top of the ticket.

Nailing down precise numbers, though, is not easy. Arizona does not track ethnicity on its voter registration forms. Many Native Americans work in cities and towns off the reservations, but keep a permanent address on one. And addresses on reservations don’t necessarily have street numbers. In fact, registration forms allow voters to locate their homes by drawing a map of nearby landmarks ― an intersection, say, or even a large boulder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom