I don't get this whole Breitbart reporter story. Now she resigned? Why? It just makes it look like she was a liar.
Because Breitbart threw her under the bus. They printed stories suggesting that she was lying, why would she stay and keep working there? Part of the conservative mindset is never thinking you could be on the outside until suddenly you're on the outside.
Didn't she say she was pushed to the ground when video showed that didn't happen?
I'll say at best she exaggerated this story it seems. A video came out showing that too much of nothing happened.
I have to say this stuff depresses me.
First Lewandowski says to another reporter that he did it, but he didn't know who she was. Then they start calling her boyfriend telling him to shut her up. Then they decide to say they don't know her and it didn't happen and she's just a crazy woman. Lewandowski even says he never met her!
Now there's a video of an interaction between Lewandowski and Fields -- not necessarily the ONE interaction they've ever had, just A video -- in which he does make physical contact with her, and suddenly everybody's decided that she's obviously a liar because it doesn't look like it hurt enough.
So, first off, I want to point out that the fundamental component of this argument is that women are irrational and make shit up about assault. There's no other way to make this story work -- like, nobody is suggesting Fields is crazy (yet), or that she got paid off, or whatever. In the Trump story she just decided to lie, to the extent of filing a police report, quitting her job, somehow convincing a Washington Post reporter to write an article saying they witnessed the event, and convincing other Breitbart employees to quit as well, just because she wanted to lie. She's a reporter for Breitbart! It's not like she was waiting around for the perfect anti-conservative moment. She has no reason to be making up stories about Donald Trump. So the only way for this narrative to work, and unfortunately it works for a lot of people, is to assume that sometimes women just decide to lie about you attacking them, because you know how women get.
Secondly I want to raise, again, the question of theory of mind. What did Michelle Fields done so far?
* She wrote an article.
* She talked to other friends and witnesses to corroborate her story.
* She filed a police report.
* When her workplace started suggesting she was lying, she quit her job.
If you think she's lying, she's gone to a ton of trouble and effort to do so and kind of fucked up her life, when she could easily have said "oh well, nobody's buying it" and gone back to work (which seems to be the primary thing Trump's campaign wanted from her). If she's telling the truth, she's just done what anybody unwilling to be gaslighted would do.
What has Corey Lewandowski done so far?
* He said "Oh, yeah, I did that."
* He said "Stop telling people I did that."
* He said "I didn't do that, I didn't touch you, I've never even met you."
* He said "Here's a video of us interacting, with me touching you, that shows that I didn't do that."
Just from those bullet points, does this guy really sound like the most reliable source to you? If somebody came out and said that you attacked them when you didn't do it, is this a reasonable description of the stuff you would do? Is this the mental model of somebody who didn't do anything? Why are you making the choice to prioritize his narrative and discount hers?