I'm starting to get annoyed by my friends who are bernie stans. They still pretend like he has a chance, and one dude posted this asinine quote from dennis miller about how if you gave bernie all the superdelegates that were "given by the powers that be" hed be winning.
Like fucking get over it already.
Just a bit:
Emerson NY (3/14-3/16):
Clinton: 71
Sanders: 23
http://media.wix.com/ugd/3bebb2_e6ef41f2113347feaedca7d88762c6f3.pdf
Yall remember when New York Joined the confederacy? Not surprising those losers are voting for Clinton.
Dennis miller? Is it 1997?
More importantly we should wait for a credible poll of the state.New York is still a month away. A lot can change. Do they have early voting?
Bernie: "Hillary Clinton represents New York values!"
Dennis miller? Is it 1997?
Oh Lord, if he ever actually said that...
I can here death bells ringing.
It gets better....god damn. What's the delegate situation like for both parties? WTA for repubs?
That Emerson Poll of NY is unbelievable, it's probably junk. There's no way Kasich is at 1% lol.
Seriously? I mean I don't live in New York, but still, I thought NYC would have a lot of Bernie support because of it's percentage of young people.
Daniel B·;198565749 said:Ah, but I'm sure voters are seriously considering who would provide the best chance of beating Drumpf, which is obviously Bernie, who, according to virtually every poll, would easily send Drumpf packing .
It gets better....god damn. What's the delegate situation like for both parties? WTA for repubs?
The results themselves are frankly nonsense, this poll is not worth considering.They're rated C+ by 538. Not the best poll out there.
Daniel B·;198565749 said:Ah, but I'm sure voters are seriously considering who would provide the best chance of beating Trump, which is obviously Bernie, who, according to virtually every poll, would easily send Trump packing .
Arizona is a primary not a caucus. And I'd expect HRC to win it, probably by enough to offset whatever wins he gets in the caucuses.
That Emerson Poll of NY is unbelievable, it's probably junk. There's no way Kasich is at 1% lol.
More importantly we should wait for a credible poll of the state.
Seriously? I mean I don't live in New York, but still, I thought NYC would have a lot of Bernie support because of it's percentage of young people.
hey retro and adam there can be peace.
Nsync and Backstreet Boys are teaming up to fight zombies
http://www.buzzfeed.com/keelyflaher...e-movie-is-her?utm_term=.ppe60KdmN#.gpPArMdWp
Daniel B·;198565749 said:Ah, but I'm sure voters are seriously considering who would provide the best chance of beating Trump, which is obviously Bernie, who, according to virtually every poll, would easily send Trump packing .
Daniel B·;198565987 said:Oops; well 5/6 are caucuses. Another close contest in Arizona will suffice .
Do you sincerely believe this would hold once the attacks start?
Seriously? I mean I don't live in New York, but still, I thought NYC would have a lot of Bernie support because of it's percentage of young people.
Daniel B·;198566279 said:Absolutely! The American public love our nation's great "social" programs, such as Social Security etc, and will put up a fight to defend them from the Republicans.
Daniel B·;198565987 said:Oops; well 5/6 are caucuses. Another close contest in Arizona will suffice .
didn't he used to be liberal, then 9/11 activated his racist mode?
btw I get all my political opinions from James Wood
Daniel B·;198565987 said:Another close contest in Arizona will suffice .
Suffice???
They already remade Liar LiarI hate the guy but I have to admit he's pretty damn funny
Daniel B·;198566279 said:Absolutely! The American public love our nation's great "social" programs, such as Social Security etc, and will put up a fight to defend them, from the Republicans.
I hate the guy but I have to admit he's pretty damn funny
Just a bit:
Emerson NY (3/14-3/16):
Clinton: 71
Sanders: 23
http://media.wix.com/ugd/3bebb2_e6ef41f2113347feaedca7d88762c6f3.pdf
I hate the guy but I have to admit he's pretty damn funny
While Bernie would support Obama's appointment of Garland, he would retract Garland and pick a new justice if elected.
Is that supposed to be in some way controversial ? Because it's entirely rational to either a) Support Obama putting forward Garland in the current Senate environment while preferring someone else with a different Senate environment or b) Supporting Obama's nomination of Garland even if you'd prefer someone else to Garland.
(I'm about 45% convinced at this point that someone is going to seriously make the argument that Sander's endorsement of Clinton, when it happens, is actually deeply antithetical to the Democratic party somehow. )
I don't agree, but to each his own. I think that in a fight between socialism and Trumpism, the middle isn't going to flock to the left in the kinds of numbers we need to change the balance of the Supreme Court and take back the Senate. This election has to be about serious competent governance vs bigotry and incompetence as much or more than it has to be about left vs right. I think Sanders' big promises are an unrealistic vision that would be a serious distraction in the General Election.
I hate the guy but I have to admit he's pretty damn funny
I hate the guy but I have to admit he's pretty damn funny
Sigh. Straight from the candidate's mouth that he's okay with superdelegates overriding the will of the voters. Hypocrite.
Sigh. Straight from the candidate's mouth that he's okay with superdelegates overriding the will of the voters. Hypocrite.