Orbis Tabula
Member
He did and it was the Daniel B-est series of posts.
Awesome. Important question. Did he give any new flaxseed based recipes?
He did and it was the Daniel B-est series of posts.
He's just not funny and the drone army saying drumpf every two minutes is stupid.Oliver is [now?] saying the Drumpf bit was an attempt to separate the Trump brand/myth from the facts/reality of his policies and business history.
I don't think any of it's particularly successful or insightful. Certainly in practice it's just a way to smugly mock Trump.
I almost feel bad that he's going to be disappointed.
Yeah. Hillary coming out against TPP guarantees that it will get passed before she leaves office, because Obama wants it done.
For one thing, corporations have been able to sue countries for years. And they SHOULD be able to sue countries in some circumstances. If a country decides it#s just going to seize control of every factory in the country, then the owners of those factories should be able to sue for damages and the cost of the factories.
He's just not funny and the drone army saying drumpf every two minutes is stupid.
she?
Something about sending Bill Clinton to jail.Oh, dang, really? Leave it to be to post this just one night too late. Great timing, Joe.
He's just not funny and the drone army saying drumpf every two minutes is stupid.
Nah.
Not surprising, it's a thread that explicitly calls out basically half of BernieGAF.I come back and the topic here and in OT "I'm Progressive and..." exploded in numbers. What's up?
I didn't think Trevor Noah's standup was funny, either. Why they picked him when I am certain there are dozens of homegrown American comedians with more passion, a more individuated perspective, and who are more clued-in to American politics, is beyond me.
That number is bound to shoot up at some point, for any number of reasons. Could be easy money.
I like it.Speaking of which: how does Larry Wilmore still have a show?
I mean, Clinton got 68% in Puerto Rico in 2008. I would not be surprised if she did better this year.
Nate Cohn ‏@Nate_Cohn 14h14 hours ago Washington, DC
Puerto Rico is ranked #11 for dem delegates. A 50 pt Clinton win would cancel expected Sanders wins in UT/AK/ID/MT
Adrian CarrasquilloVerified account
‏@Carrasquillo
.@Nate_Cohn on how Sanders wins. Clinton would likely win Puerto Rico bigger than Rubio tho http://nyti.ms/1UC6gdK
Nate Cohn ‏@Nate_Cohn 14h14 hours ago Washington, DC
Nate Cohn Retweeted Adrian Carrasquillo
If this is true--and it could be--it would basically be game over for Sanders.
This article pretty much makes the case why our media sucks even though it has nothing to do with that directly.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/03/gop-must-answer-for-what-it-did-to-kansas.html
Basically the article is about why no one is asking the gop contenders why their model failed in Kansas and Louisiana.
More people need to know about this.
When's Puerto Rico again?
June 5th...
This article pretty much makes the case why our media sucks even though it has nothing to do with that directly.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/03/gop-must-answer-for-what-it-did-to-kansas.html
Basically the article is about why no one is asking the gop contenders why their model failed in Kansas and Louisiana.
More people need to know about this.
June 5th...
This article pretty much makes the case why our media sucks even though it has nothing to do with that directly.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/03/gop-must-answer-for-what-it-did-to-kansas.html
Basically the article is about why no one is asking the gop contenders why their model failed in Kansas and Louisiana.
More people need to know about this.
David Brooks said:He is a childish man running for a job that requires maturity. He is an insecure boasting little boy whose desires were somehow arrested at age 12. He surrounds himself with sycophants. You can always tell when the king is here, Trumps butler told Jason Horowitz in a recent Times profile. He brags incessantly about his alleged prowess, like how far he can hit a golf ball. Do I hit it long? Is Trump strong? he asks.
In some rare cases, political victors do not deserve our respect. George Wallace won elections, but to endorse those outcomes would be a moral failure.
And so it is with Trump.
Speaking of which: how does Larry Wilmore still have a show?
This article pretty much makes the case why our media sucks even though it has nothing to do with that directly.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/03/gop-must-answer-for-what-it-did-to-kansas.html
Basically the article is about why no one is asking the gop contenders why their model failed in Kansas and Louisiana.
More people need to know about this.
It's way better than Trevor Noah's Daily Show.
Yeah it is baffling when you lay it out like that. Like I said maybe a month ago, the only good thing about Kansas is that it can be used as a bad example. The problem being is that no one does use it as any kind of example. We are a failed state; the architects of which face no consequences beyond maybe being voted out in another 2 years. Our media is incompetent and complicit in the damage they allow to propagate through their silence.
God that "If not Sanders then nobody" thread is making me so fucking angry.
I should probably stop going in before I say something even crazier than I already have.
I mean, let's be real:
- they wouldn't answer the question
- even if that shit did become national stories half the country wouldn't listen
The myth of the liberal media prevents stuff like this from being called out on because if it is then half the country just thinks, "oh the liberal media is at it again," and just ignores the issue.
They just need to make sure every panel is a good panel and it would be fine.
Conservative did a huge amount of damage to the media's credibility in regards to their ability to critique the GOP.
Then the media needs to grow a pair and summon some of that courage that allowed the media of yester year to break the watergate story. Bring facts to the table, confront them at every turn with their failures and make them answer. But no, they are afraid of how their viewers might react. You cannot let those who you are supposed to hold accountable control the message.
Then the media needs to grow a pair and summon some of that courage that allowed the media of yester year to break the watergate story. Bring facts to the table, confront them at every turn with their failures and make them answer. But no, they are afraid of how their viewers might react. You cannot let those who you are supposed to hold accountable control the message.
Shit dude, I agree, but the people that need to hear this shit would just tune out.
Then the media needs to grow a pair and summon some of that courage that allowed the media of yester year to break the watergate story. Bring facts to the table, confront them at every turn with their failures and make them answer. But no, they are afraid of how their viewers might react. You cannot let those who you are supposed to hold accountable control the message.
This article pretty much makes the case why our media sucks even though it has nothing to do with that directly.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/03/gop-must-answer-for-what-it-did-to-kansas.html
Basically the article is about why no one is asking the gop contenders why their model failed in Kansas and Louisiana.
More people need to know about this.
They [the Australian Labor Party] pay for our flights. They pay for the cost of accommodations, which is just the staff house, and then we also get a $60 stipend a day, said Rebecca Doyle, an Australian campaign volunteer in New Hampshire, in the hidden-camera footage.
Under federal law, foreign nationals are permitted to work on U.S. campaigns as volunteers, but cannot be compensated.
In addition, federal law bans foreign contributions to campaigns, describing it as unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State or local election.
I give him credit for being a sneaky bastard (so, a great politician), but he's mostly just a stubborn jerk. The only reason he's "in there" is because he refused to drop out despite having no reason to stay in. Everyone else in that same position just left. Instead, he banks it on winning his own state's primary. Literally any of the candidates that dropped could have tried out that same strategy, but didn't and dropped when it became clear they'd never win the delegate total.Call me crazy but the big winner in this whole mess is Kasich. Dude climbed out the gutter to be seriously considered
I'm not sure we talked about this before....
Australians say they were paid by Labour Party to Work for Bernie Sanders
Anyway, the former Speaker of the NH House has filed an FEC complaint about it.
I believe yesterday was the deadline for Bernie's people to return the foreign contributions they received, as well as to return the amounts they received over the legally allowed limits.
I'm sure this is a non-story, but I still find it hilarious that one campaign breached another's data. One campaign pretended to be union workers to illegally gain access to areas they weren't supposed to be. One campaign had to have the FEC come down on the for illegal contributions. And now one campaign had workers they shouldn't have had....yet Hillary is the dishonest one.
Okay. Yup. Sure.
I'm not sure we talked about this before....
Australians say they were paid by Labour Party to Work for Bernie Sanders
Anyway, the former Speaker of the NH House has filed an FEC complaint about it.
I believe yesterday was the deadline for Bernie's people to return the foreign contributions they received, as well as to return the amounts they received over the legally allowed limits.
I'm sure this is a non-story, but I still find it hilarious that one campaign breached another's data. One campaign pretended to be union workers to illegally gain access to areas they weren't supposed to be. One campaign had to have the FEC come down on the for illegal contributions. And now one campaign had workers they shouldn't have had....yet Hillary is the dishonest one.
Okay. Yup. Sure.