-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
PoliGAF 2016 |OT3| You know what they say about big Michigans - big Florida
- Thread starter Spoiled Milk
- Start date
- Status
User 463088
Banned
Indeed.
In the end Bernie is indeed a typical politician. Not much positivity from him now, that's for certain.
QuiteWhittle
Member
if there were no black people republicans would carry PA, MI, OH, VA, and FL and win every election with at least 52% of the vote
Suikoguy
I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
Maybe? I thought some of the district returns looked like maybe he did not.
Exit polling showed he did, but some of the polling from other states IIRC said he did not.
GOT ONE
QuiteWhittle
Member
Doubt it. Arizona's a closed primary so Indys won't save him like in Michigan, if that was going to happen on the first place.
theignoramus
Member
Hypocrisy from the GOP? Surely, a first.
A Cruz fanatic on my timeline had the nerve to tweet out a racist comment from Che about Black people, like she had a newfound sensitivity to that kind of thing.
Suikoguy
I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
*sigh*
Macho Madness
Member
I don't like Romney but lmao: https://twitter.com/keithurbahn/status/712436270845313025
excelsiorlef
Member
That's legit great. And kind of gutsy for Romney to make a polygamy joke. But then I guess he's not running for president...
yet
User 463088
Banned
Rmoney told a funny!
RustyNails
Member
That's legit amazing. RomBot OS upgrade really good.
Aaron Strife
Banned
Just shared this on my Facebook.
Can't wait for the same three people to tell me I'm wrong and that if only every Bernie supporter was just willing to write his name in he'd win easily.
... propensity to disappoint?
Source? I couldn't find sweet FA on Google, just Cenk's TYT video from yesterday, essentially suggesting that, given the popularity of the TYT Network, among potential Bernie supporters, Bernie could reach more voters, than doing interviews on traditional TV media.
If Bernie has indeed finally agreed to an interview, which I've argued previously, TYT unquestionably deserves (they played a significant role in highlighting the various issues that Bernie's campaign is all about, and leading up to the first debate (also in recent weeks), were very pro-Bernie (Cenk, Ana and Jimmy - John has remained largely lukewarm, since first debate)), and although I think he wouldn't win over many more voters, purely because TYT viewers are pro-Bernie already, having just outlined, in detail, his foreign policy positions, which were just what we had been hoping for (and I have absolutely no reason to question the sincerity of his remarks), plus "cross fingers", a great night tonight, an in-person interview with Cenk, could nonetheless be epic
.Daniel B·;198952012 said:Source? I couldn't find sweet FA on Google, just Cenk's TYT video from yesterday, essentially suggesting that, given the popularity of the TYT Network, among potential Bernie supporters, Bernie could reach more voters, than doing interviews on traditional TV media.
If Bernie has indeed finally agreed to an interview, which I've argued previously, TYT unquestionably deserves (they played a significant role in highlighting the various issues that Bernie's campaign is all about, and leading up to the first debate (also in recent weeks), were very pro-Bernie (Cenk, Ana and Jimmy - John has remained largely lukewarm, since first debate), and although I think he wouldn't win over many more voters, purely because TYT viewers are pro-Bernie already, having just outlined, in detail, his foreign policy positions, which were just what we had been hoping for (and I have absolutely no reason to question the sincerity of his remarks), plus "cross fingers", a great night tonight, an in-person interview with Cenk, could nonetheless be epic
thats... quite the sentence
the comments section is glorious.
Macho Madness
Member
I tried to read it but stopped at the third parenthetical break.
User 463088
Banned
Rachel trying so damn hard to pretend that Bernie's caucus strategy is the same as Obama's in 2008.
Of course it is. Except, you know, Bernie didn't win the south. Didn't run up margins anywhere. But other than that, it's identical.
Of course it is. Except, you know, Bernie didn't win the south. Didn't run up margins anywhere. But other than that, it's identical.
Macho Madness
Member
Polling has been sparse.
Basileus777
Member
The only reason to doubt Hillary is that there hasn't been a ton of polling. Everything points to her winning comfortably.
User 463088
Banned
Macho Madness
Member
Thank you Rachel Maddow.
She literally said that to me right after I posted that. I'm watching the Xfinity stream which is like a minute behind.
You should see my source code
(actually, it's v. clean; from 20+ yrs coding experience), but was the TYT Bernie interview just a windup?Fenderputty
Banned
Complete with smiley face.
Joe Shlabotnik
Banned
Top 1% of the top 1% of comma use
User 463088
Banned
Rachel Maddow is wonky as hell, and I love it. You an tell she just loves this shit. I don't like her bullshitting about the importance of caucuses, but get it gurl.
Also, I love when Hillary wears leather.
Also, I love when Hillary wears leather.
Macho Madness
Member
lmao Utah Republicans. Has to be because of online voting, right?
StopMakingSense
Member
Daniel B will come around to Hillary. Just needs clojure.
Apple deprecating ++ and --. Trump was right.
the_wall += 1;
Ether_Snake
å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®å®
So I watched Trump's AIPAC speech. I expected much better from the comments I read. It was good in the sense that he said the right things considering how low expectations were, had some humour, almost making fun of his character a little, but for something read from a teleprompter I expected better.
The one thing I would have made sure to say is attack Cruz's "non-neutral" line:
"I'm sure you've heard another candidate say that he would not be neutral on the peace process, and in fact attacked me for saying that I would be neutral. I'm sure you've heard about it, some even think it was a mistake for me to say I would be neutral on the peace process. Let's make this clear: for the past eight years this country hasn't been neutral on this issue, it hasn't been! *applause* And you know things are worst off for Israel as a result. Obama didn't come out and say he wouldn't be neutral, but he wasn't, and the result of that was an erosion of our relationship and an increasingly isolated Israel at the negotiation table, if there was a table left at all.
But let me tell you this: the day the United States of America's president would say "we won't be neutral on the peace process" is the day the United States of America would make its support of Israel irrelevant, it's the day that Israel would immediately find itself on its own, because no one else would show up at the negotiation table if we did, and if we didn't show up then who would be there to make sure that Israel gets a fair deal? Nobody; Israel would be on its own, and let's face it, there would really be no more peace process at all, and we all know where that would lead.
I will not take a position that will make the United States of America's support for Israel irrelevant, I will not take a position that will leave Israel isolated, I will not let Israel be on its own at the negotiation table and get no fair deal. If I become president, I guarantee you, the United States of America's support for Israel will never become irrelevant, dattebayo!"
The one thing I would have made sure to say is attack Cruz's "non-neutral" line:
"I'm sure you've heard another candidate say that he would not be neutral on the peace process, and in fact attacked me for saying that I would be neutral. I'm sure you've heard about it, some even think it was a mistake for me to say I would be neutral on the peace process. Let's make this clear: for the past eight years this country hasn't been neutral on this issue, it hasn't been! *applause* And you know things are worst off for Israel as a result. Obama didn't come out and say he wouldn't be neutral, but he wasn't, and the result of that was an erosion of our relationship and an increasingly isolated Israel at the negotiation table, if there was a table left at all.
But let me tell you this: the day the United States of America's president would say "we won't be neutral on the peace process" is the day the United States of America would make its support of Israel irrelevant, it's the day that Israel would immediately find itself on its own, because no one else would show up at the negotiation table if we did, and if we didn't show up then who would be there to make sure that Israel gets a fair deal? Nobody; Israel would be on its own, and let's face it, there would really be no more peace process at all, and we all know where that would lead.
I will not take a position that will make the United States of America's support for Israel irrelevant, I will not take a position that will leave Israel isolated, I will not let Israel be on its own at the negotiation table and get no fair deal. If I become president, I guarantee you, the United States of America's support for Israel will never become irrelevant, dattebayo!"
If there were no black people, Bernie would have no reason to run, because white people would have never voted to ditch the labor protections and social safety nets they started building with the New Deal.
Remember, Republicans once had to pay lip service like this:
TheLostBigBoss
Banned
User 463088
Banned
Bernie spent $3.4 million this week in Arizona, Idaho, Utah, Hawaii, and Washington.
Holy shit brah. That's a damn bern rate.
Holy shit brah. That's a damn bern rate.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked
- Locked