TheLostBigBoss
Banned
In Cleveland:
Police will have to show a huge amount of restraint.
They aren't black, I'm sure they feel safe
In Cleveland:
Police will have to show a huge amount of restraint.
FUCK!!!!
This whole shebang has been going on since February. Or earlier really. American elections are so long.
They aren't black, I'm sure they feel safe
Has he... Photoshopped his wife in?
Ed Gallek ‏@edgallekfox8 60m60 minutes ago
Cleveland Police union asking OH governor for temporary end to legal open carry of weapons w Republican Convention here
But which Law and Order?
SVU sucks
Sadly, I know you're serious that politicians would be serious about this.Taking guns away from black people I guess?
Is this the Nixon "law and order" play? Are they really trying to use campaign themes from 40 years ago
But which Law and Order?
SVU sucks
Wouldn't "law and order" in this case mean some forms of gun control? Not really sure how else you could manage the "order" part.
Oh, and fuck you for the instant politicization, of course.Sadly, I know you're serious that politicians would be serious about this.
I will fight you.
What does he even mean? What kind of law and order is he offering? Taking guns away from black people I guess? A tank for every police officer?
Hey, it is more recent than wanting it to be the '50s.Is this the Nixon "law and order" play? Are they really trying to use campaign themes from 40 years ago
Wouldn't "law and order" in this case mean some forms of gun control? Not really sure how else you could manage the "order" part.
Oh, and fuck you for the instant politicization, of course.Sadly, I know you're serious that politicians would be serious about this.
Still wouldn't help, lol. I'm just interested in seeing how politicians tie themselves in knots this fall on how to justify zero changes to gun ownership or sales laws. If the deaths of law enforcement won't get them to act, nothing will, ever. Merciless slaughter of young kids didn't cut it, but police are (rightfully) 100% sacred in terms of public safety.I think he's referring to increases to the military budget, more incarcerations, more surveillance, etc.
You never see people walking around with assault rifles in town.Serious question to people in open carry states-- How do you resist the urge to call 911 any and every time you see someone toting an assault rifle around?
Serious question to people in open carry states-- How do you resist the urge to call 911 any and every time you see someone toting an assault rifle around?
Still wouldn't help, lol. I'm just interested in seeing how politicians tie themselves in knots this fall on how to justify zero changes to gun ownership or sales laws. If the deaths of law enforcement won't get them to act, nothing will, ever. Merciless slaughter of young kids didn't cut it, but police are (rightfully) 100% sacred in terms of public safety.
Serious question to people in open carry states-- How do you resist the urge to call 911 any and every time you see someone toting an assault rifle around?
Hey, it is more recent than wanting it to be the '50s.
Serious question to people in open carry states-- How do you resist the urge to call 911 any and every time you see someone toting an assault rifle around?
They need to stop calling them "assault rifles" and just go with the more accurate term "weapons of war". Basically, anything that was ever designed by and for the military, or anything derived from them, should never be made available for public sale. Certain ones should be banned outright and made illegal to own, with buyback programs compelling owners to give them up. This line of bullshit that a semi-auto .22 hunting rifle is the same as a SCAR needs to be rejected.
You just defined a term that includes every gun ever manufactured, plus the Internet.
Banning semi-automatic long guns is nuts. Almost all long guns in the world are semi-automatic. People don't generally run around with bolt action rifles for hunting deer. That's like bow hunting.
If your goal is to limit guns that are best designed for killing humans, you could focus on caliber or ammo type. That might work.
Also many individual places have a lot of restrictions on open carry.
And you'll inevitably draw the "Chris Kyle was the deadliest sniper in US history and he used a hunting rifle" line as well.
The hardest part about gun control arguments is that virtually none of them would prevent a lot of mass shootings. The genie is out of the bottle here; we simply have too many guns and ammo lying around to talk gun control in terms of other nations' solutions. We've actually got to trailblaze here somehow and figure out what to do about guns in a country where they outnumber people.
And you'll inevitably draw the "Chris Kyle was the deadliest sniper in US history and he used a hunting rifle" line as well.
The hardest part about gun control arguments is that virtually none of them would prevent a lot of mass shootings. The genie is out of the bottle here; we simply have too many guns and ammo lying around to talk gun control in terms of other nations' solutions. We've actually got to trailblaze here somehow and figure out what to do about guns in a country where they outnumber people.
Yeah, and every person I've ever talked to with guns would argue that you're just making yourself the first target in a shooting. They either conceal carry or just don't carry at all.
I couldn't even find the US and then I was like, whoa.Interesting article
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...ericans-stand-out-from-the-rest-of-the-world/
Spent my entire life in an open carry state and I have never seen anyone open carry outside of law enforcement.
I couldn't even find the US and then I was like, whoa.
It's almost comical.Took me a second too, the data point almost doesn't work with that chart layout.
(Request after what happened today in Baton Rouge).
My neighbours blast Mexican music sometimes all fucking night, literally until like 1-2am, and this is gross.
What in God's name does Trump expect? Does he want the President to be a psychic and put people in jail before they commit crimes?
It's not like Obama hasn't been trying to pass meaningful gun reform laws to at least help try to combat these issues.
The problem is "nobody is held accountable for their actions anymore", and only Trump/the GOP can fix that....somehow.What in God's name does Trump expect? Does he want the President to be a psychic and put people in jail before they commit crimes?
It's not like Obama hasn't been trying to pass meaningful gun reform laws to at least help try to combat these issues.
What in God's name does Trump expect? Does he want the President to be a psychic and put people in jail before they commit crimes?
It's not like Obama hasn't been trying to pass meaningful gun reform laws to at least help try to combat these issues.
What in God's name does Trump expect? Does he want the President to be a psychic and put people in jail before they commit crimes?
It's not like Obama hasn't been trying to pass meaningful gun reform laws to at least help try to combat these issues.
Gary Johnson at 11%? He's going to get on the debate stage if he keeps rising. 4 points away. How many polls have to show him at 15% until he's on the stage?
They used like 4-6 polls for the primary debates I believe.However many it takes to create an average of 15.
Gary Johnson at 11%? He's going to get on the debate stage if he keeps rising. 4 points away. How many polls have to show him at 15% until he's on the stage?
And you'll inevitably draw the "Chris Kyle was the deadliest sniper in US history and he used a hunting rifle" line as well.
The hardest part about gun control arguments is that virtually none of them would prevent a lot of mass shootings. The genie is out of the bottle here; we simply have too many guns and ammo lying around to talk gun control in terms of other nations' solutions. We've actually got to trailblaze here somehow and figure out what to do about guns in a country where they outnumber people.
We thought Bernie might have been the third party spoiler at one point, but now it might be Johnson. Dammit.If Johnson gets 15%, hopefully it's just for 1 debate. I hate that these two are driving people to that silly party.
The numerous polls that show Johnson is pulling a lot more support from trump? Guy is a libertarian and former republican governor. He is the second option many republicans are looking at.We thought Bernie might have been the third party spoiler at one point, but now it might be Johnson. Dammit.
Again, do we have data on who exactly is flocking to Johnson?