ShironRedshift
Member
Also,
News media, Twitter, Facebook, etc, will give all kinds of coverage to her speeches regardless of whether she's selected since that's just how media works today in that everything gets covered to fill airtime, and this is compounded in Trump's case since he will no doubt be unable to resist going after Warren whenever she does that since she just gets under his skin like nothing else, and the fact that she's able to do that as a Senator in of itself proves that she doesn't need to be the VP to continue to do it.
Warren will give speeches in support of Hillary and attacking Trump all over the place.
They will get under Trump's skin and he will be unable to resit responding to "Pocahontas" because that's who he is.
If the media didn't cover Warren's speeches for their own sake to fill air time they will because of Trump's response.
This will happen. It's not an if or could or might. It will.
None of this changes regardless of whether she's VP or not. That will all play out the same way, and thus is not a point in her favor as VP (if anything against it since she will have to be more careful if anything if she is the VP) and thus I do not understand this reasoning for her being the VP since that will play out more-or less the same way regardless of whether she's chosen or not. Yes, she'll get even more attention if she's the VP, but not really significantly since Trump will drag it into either way.
Warren is wonderful, and I'd be overjoyed if she somehow does wind up being the pick and we have a two-women ticket and we not only shatter the glass ceiling but totally obliterate it in the process, but this really isn't a point actually in favor of her as far as I can see it as that much should more or less play out the same regardless.
I feel this is kinda glorifying the position of VP candidate a bit and just how much extra attention it really garners a person compared to other surrogates and supporters, especially in this era of 24/7 news and social media and complete and total coverage. Warren can and will be giving those speeches regardless of whether she's VP or not (and if anything, her speeches will be stronger if she's not selected because she'll have to worry less about the stuff she's saying negatively reflecting on Hillary since she won't be officially connected to the campaign, whereas she would no doubt be kept on at least something of a leash if she were selected).Warren brings media eyeballs in a way that Kaine or Pence never can achieve. Any speech she made would be covered live on cable, or reshown dozens of times throughout the day. People would share her attack speeches widely on social media. She would be an incredibly desirable interview. She would be the biggest story of the campaign for a solid month or two and that's a good thing if she can convey an effective message while reporters and cameras rush towards her. She's just infectious to cover.
News media, Twitter, Facebook, etc, will give all kinds of coverage to her speeches regardless of whether she's selected since that's just how media works today in that everything gets covered to fill airtime, and this is compounded in Trump's case since he will no doubt be unable to resist going after Warren whenever she does that since she just gets under his skin like nothing else, and the fact that she's able to do that as a Senator in of itself proves that she doesn't need to be the VP to continue to do it.
Warren will give speeches in support of Hillary and attacking Trump all over the place.
They will get under Trump's skin and he will be unable to resit responding to "Pocahontas" because that's who he is.
If the media didn't cover Warren's speeches for their own sake to fill air time they will because of Trump's response.
This will happen. It's not an if or could or might. It will.
None of this changes regardless of whether she's VP or not. That will all play out the same way, and thus is not a point in her favor as VP (if anything against it since she will have to be more careful if anything if she is the VP) and thus I do not understand this reasoning for her being the VP since that will play out more-or less the same way regardless of whether she's chosen or not. Yes, she'll get even more attention if she's the VP, but not really significantly since Trump will drag it into either way.
Warren is wonderful, and I'd be overjoyed if she somehow does wind up being the pick and we have a two-women ticket and we not only shatter the glass ceiling but totally obliterate it in the process, but this really isn't a point actually in favor of her as far as I can see it as that much should more or less play out the same regardless.