What about Rand? Isn't he a guaranteed no?
He said he would vote yes on MTP if McConnell promised there would be a floor vote on repeal only. So that seems like a pretty easy yes to get right now. Always possible that Rand will then vote no when it comes time for BCRA or whatever is being put up as the final bill, but I think it's just as possible that after the floor vote for repeal-only fails, he'll just fall in with whatever everyone else is supporting because he made the try.
What about Rand? Isn't he a guaranteed no?
That seems likely to me. I have never felt good about counting on Rand Paul. Why wouldn't he ultimately be okay with cutting hundreds of thousands of Kentuckians off health insurance -- he's named after Ayn Rand!He said he would vote yes on MTP if McConnell promised there would be a floor vote on repeal only. So that seems like a pretty easy yes to get right now. Always possible that Rand will then vote no when it comes time for BCRA or whatever is being put up as the final bill, but I think it's just as possible that after the floor vote for repeal-only fails, he'll just fall in with whatever everyone else is supporting because he made the try.
If Rand was going to fall in line, he would have done so a month ago.
Okay, if that's the case, I'm not gonna get too worried about today. Just a little worried.In other words, even moving forward today means they still have a giant uphill battle to actually passing something
Any chance the Senate bucks the Parliamentarian and passes their BCRA(p)?
I'm not too worried about full repeal. Seems like that'll end a lot of careers if they pull that off somehow.
I keep thinking that maybe McCain will vote No because he's dying and has nothing to lose and he hates Trump and maybe had an epiphany while he was able to use health insurance to go to the doctor he is denying millions from accessing.
Then I think: this is not a fucking fairy tale and I throw up on myself.
Welllll he didn't have a vote on clean repeal a month ago. I'm not entirely sure what Rand will do after a repeal vote. I think it's a not-great sign if they move to proceed and a clean repeal bill is up before the BCRA or whatever frankenstein version they come up with.
Video embedded in article.The ad opens with sounds of gunshots being fired and shouts of, "Stay down!" The accompanying text says, "June 14: A Bernie Sanders supporter fires on Republican Congressmen."
The video goes on to show a journalist asking Brooks just after the shooting whether his views have been changed "on the gun situation in America."
"The Second Amendment right to bear arms is to help ensure that we always have a republic," Brooks says. "So no, I'm not changing my position on any of the rights that we enjoy as Americans."
http://www.businessinsider.in/Liber...ir-hamburger-problem/articleshow/59640802.cms
It's an interesting take. Don't agree with it 100%. Do agree with it at some level. Liberals won the cultural wars, no need to take it too far. More importantly, no need to make people feel that simple things they like to do is bad for you/earth/children/atmosphere.
That didn't take long.
New Senate Campaign Ad For Mo Brooks Features Baseball Practice Shooting
Video embedded in article.
I'm seriously hyperventilating and can't concentrate at work.
I mean, I can't argue with any of his points.Josh Barro has a weird obsession with hamburgers.
I'm seriously hyperventilating and can't concentrate at work.
I'm seriously hyperventilating and can't concentrate at work.
Plz explain this a little further
We know they gave up on her yesterday.
They wouldn't need McCain back if she was willing to vote yes
Listen to some relaxing music. I usually put on some 60s and 70s music, that's usually pretty easy listening.I'm seriously hyperventilating and can't concentrate at work.
So to recap RE: Jeff Sessions, Trump is pressuring him to resign rather than firing him because his lawyers likely told him that firing him outright would be obstructing justice?
Am I getting that right?
So to recap RE: Jeff Sessions, Trump is pressuring him to resign rather than firing him because his lawyers likely told him that firing him outright would be obstructing justice?
Am I getting that right?
Firing him outright would give us a Saturday Night Massacre version 2.0 scenario, and someone with some intelligence advising him has likely let him know that would be a bad idea. Insulting him until he quits makes more sense, and fits Trump's cowardly personality better.
Not quite. Trump has every right to fire Sessions or anyone in the cabinet, but he knows that firings attract bad press, especially this early in his tenure. He thus wants Sessions to resign.
Then—after hooking its red-pilled fans with an extended critique of the emptiness of neoliberalism, epitomized by a sneering, ”safe space"-mocking character that was literally named Reality—it tried confronting the audience who had most embraced their ramped-up anti-PC crusades. Last season kicked off with Cartman admitting to Kyle, ”We're two privileged, straight white boys who have their laughs about things we never had to deal with," a confession rendered only slightly tongue-in-cheek by the fact of who was saying it. And it culminated in Gerald, who'd spent the year gleefully harassing people online, squaring off with the Danish prime minister, a stand-in for every troll the show's ever nurtured:
"I want to stand here and tell you that you and I are different, but it's not true. All we've been doing is making excuses for being horrible people. I don't know if you tried to teach me a lesson, but you have. I have to stand here and look at you. And all I see is a big fat reflection of myself."
Ultimately, of course, Gerald comes to a familiar conclusion: ”Fuck you, what I do is fucking funny, bitch!" he cries, before kicking the prime minister in the balls.
What a wacky year 2017 has been, eh?Damn, I never thought I'd hope that Jeff Sessions stays strong and doesn't resign.
.Reminder that Trump has said publicly he'll fire Price if MTP fails today
They have to ignore the Parliamentarian to pass any of their options, so yes, they'll ignore her if they can manage to find the votes.
I know this article doesn't necessarily fall into this thread's purview, and there's already a thread in OT, but the AVClub's article on South Park's role in the creation of the alt-right and their refusal to come to terms with that role is really fascinating, especially for a long time South Park fan:
http://www.avclub.com/article/south-park-raised-generation-trolls-258253
Really relevant quote:
Alternatively, they could create an option that does pass Parliamentarian mustard. If they were going to do whatever they wanted, it seems like they could craft something better (in their minds) than the Frankenstein ACA patch they've already presented.
This is impossible to craft. Any law that funds abortions isn't passing the Senate, let alone the House. And in order to pass the parliamentary, they have to fund abortions.
It's either ignore the parliamentary, or don't pass a bill.
Reminder that Trump has said publicly he'll fire Price if MTP fails today.
This is good. The fact that they won't go after Trump is so cowardly.
Also like a lot of the major portions of the legislation don't pass the parliamentarian including but not limited to the 6 month lockout which makes the markets actual markets and not wishful thinking. They would have to rethink the whole thing and them taking this vote today says to me they don't want to do that.
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
Will be traveling to the Great State of Ohio tonight. Big crowd expected. See you there!
8:29 AM · Jul 25, 2017
Wittle baby needs a ego boost.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has issued a subpoena for Paul Manafort to compel him to testify publicly before the Committee.
The Senate Judiciary Committee has issued a subpoena for Paul Manafort to compel him to testify publicly before the Committee.