whyamihere
Banned
I would only be worried about Nelson if Scott ran.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
PoliGAF 2017 |OT5| The Man In the High Chair
- Thread starter aspiegamer
- Start date
- Status
I would only be worried about Nelson if Scott ran.
Basileus777
Member
http://firehousestrategies.com/new-firehouse0ptimus-survey-trumps-shrinking-base/
LV midterm voters in Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania. Land line only. Kind of wish they showed us the states, but yeesh. Kind of makes it hard to see how the GOP wins any of the Obama/Trump Senate seats.
Oh?
For the first time ever (certain) white folk are concerned that the racial / ethnic make up of a jury could be unfair.
lmao
I thought it was confirmed Scott was running?
Though with these numbers he might not...
Basileus777
Member
Someone missed the OJ trial.
whyamihere
Banned
It's the worst of both worlds - they weren't able to repeal and replace AND they're all on the record for how they voted.
He hasn't officially jumped in yet.
Autodidact
Banned
Old folks gettin' cranky.
No. The Trump administration formally ceased arming the Syrian rebels, who are very different from the SDF. While the Syrian rebels are almost homogeneously Sunni Muslims, very religious, and seek to overthrow the Syrian state, the SDF are a secular and multicultural organization that works with both the US and the Syrian government to fight ISIS and protect. I really doubt this is thanks to Russian influence, because it's the continuation of Obama-era policies that recognized that the Syrian rebels had little hope of overthrowing the Syrian government and were much too friendly with ISIS.
Getting into Syria as we did was an enormous mistake. Thanks to a long-term Saudi and Turkish presence among the Sunni militias, the revolution to overthrow Assad quickly became a struggle between secularism and Wahhabism. The $500 million we gave to Syrian rebels largely fell into the hands of ISIS and al-Qaeda affiliates and did nothing other than prolong the inevitable government victory.
whyamihere
Banned
I can't believe Katie McGinty of all people was the closest to unseating an incumbent in a Trump state. She would've probably won if she had picked up all the main line voters who went Clinton/Toomey.
I really could use some state specific polls on favorables of LVs in North Dakota, Indiana, Missouri, and Montana tho (Manchin is kind of his own thing and I don't know if Trump's fablrables in West Virginia quite matter for him).
That's different that was like targeted micro reparations. This is more like a reverse lynching.
I have seen people refer to the OJ verdict as counting towards reparations for black people. I have to suppress my gag reflex AND refrain from punching them.
Depends.
jack_package_200
Banned
Hmm Roger Stone, Wikileaks, and TYT all spreading the same narrative
Widdle Puppy
Banned
Was there a thread on Putin signing into law a ban on vpns in Russia? Pretty disturbing news.
Russia's fire wall is gonna become an actual serious version of China's.
Russia's fire wall is gonna become an actual serious version of China's.
Which section of TYT? The one at war with Haha or the Russian stooge portion?
Aaron Strife
Banned
I think all the Obama-Trump state Democrats are pretty safe. Trump getting elected was the best thing to happen to their electoral prospects.
Manchin and Tester seem like favorites for re-elect. Worried about Donnelly and McCaskill (but not excessively). Heitkamp strikes me as being somewhere in the middle of those two camps - not quite Lean D, but I wouldn't say it's a straight toss up either.
Manchin and Tester seem like favorites for re-elect. Worried about Donnelly and McCaskill (but not excessively). Heitkamp strikes me as being somewhere in the middle of those two camps - not quite Lean D, but I wouldn't say it's a straight toss up either.
Beer Monkey
Member
Russia and their cutouts getting scared AF. Don't forget Jill Stein.
Messner and Rokita seem like they're going to have a really nasty primary, so whoever emerges there as Donnelly's opponent won't be at a hundred percent.
Is it a standard bog GOP vs trumper primary?
excelsiorlef
Member
Wait is TYT coming out against Mueller?
BlastProcessing
Member
They're just asking questions.
Suikoguy
I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
Getting rid of VPNs is very difficult since they are accessed via encryption.
You can't know what traffic it is, you can only figure out it's a VPN and manually block it.
You can attempt to automate that process, but you are very likely to target many false positives.
China has the same problem is is basically using the manual targeting method, which causes people to have to either maintain multiple VPN subs, or continually change as they get shut-down.
Yeah what the fuck is going on there?
Edit: Saw the tweet. Jesus fuck. This smells of Michael Tracey.
Smells more of anti-Bush than Anti-Mueller, but yeah.
Pretty disgusting.
Did you also know Mueller did something with the CLINTON Foundation?!
ItWasMeantToBe19
Banned
How did McGinty keep apace with Hillary.
McGinty is the worst Democratic candidate for a major race that I've ever seen.
Aaron Strife
Banned
I wonder if Sestak would have won.
Primary relitigating what up
I actually saw a Sestak sticker the other day, which was funny because I live in Minnesota.
Primary relitigating what up
I actually saw a Sestak sticker the other day, which was funny because I live in Minnesota.
ItWasMeantToBe19
Banned
Isn't Sestak a huge dickhead?
The continued popularity of Jill Stein proves its existence.
It's pretty much a done deal that Putin has his tendrils in far left groups as much as the right.
Sirpopopop
Member
Where's The Intercept?
Landline only = Old People = this sample is biased towards Trump inherently = Trump's numbers are probably actually way worse than this overall
Suikoguy
I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
Problem is that it's used to mean "anyone who's not a cut-and-paste Democrat".
What's the issue with this piece?
The American military and our intelligence services have more blood on their hands than Trump himself and are no friends of democracy. Vesting trust or power unto them isn't a great idea. As bad as Trump is, a military coup would probably make our country even worse. Liberals who cheer on that idea are dangerously naive.
Bernie Sanders, known Putin apologist,
Autodidact
Banned
I'd personally apply it to the portion of the left that embraces anti-Americanism, anti-Western liberal order, anti-NATO, etc.
Right, I think it's a phrase that doesn't really have a solid meaning and can just get used as a catchall term, which is why I don't like it. But there are some elements of the left who I think it can be agreed upon are not necessarily arguing in good faith or who could be under Russian influence who therefore I don't want to be lumped in with. I was responding to what royalan had posted.
Autodidact
Banned
I'll clarify. They embrace reflexive anti-Americanism to the point where anything America does must be bad and anything oppressive "socialist" regimes do must be good - not the same thing as leveling valid criticisms at the US from inside or outside the country.
What if I don't like any of those
BUT
at the same time I don't support Russian attempts to tear those down because I don't believe that will lead to a more progressive future?
edit: well that's more reasonable
- Status