They literally just voted it up.
Did he vote against any portion of trumps agenda?That's kind of unfortunate about Corker since his seat is a stretch for any Democrat to win and Corker was as sensible as they get for Republicans, it'll be a huge downgrade if Marsha Blackburn gets it. I really want to know his reasons for quitting.
Still think I prefer newish GOP blood here, worst case. Less experience and discipline is a net win.
Did he vote against any portion of trumps agenda?
Romney, as much as I dislike some of his positions, could take Utah and then hopefully take McConnell's leadership position and drag the Rs into the 21st Century.Hatch to Romney would be a nice upgrade.
Come on, retire already!
I think I would prefer Corker to whatever Tea Party/Trumpian lunatic is going to get the nomination.
Did he vote against any portion of trumps agenda?
"”I also believe the most important public service I have to offer our country could well occur over the next 15 months, and I want to be able to do that as thoughtfully and independently as I did the first 10 years and nine months of my Senate career.""
If it's got mayo on it, I'll become an expat.
is that a whif of impeachment?
about corker
"”I also believe the most important public service I have to offer our country could well occur over the next 15 months, and I want to be able to do that as thoughtfully and independently as I did the first 10 years and nine months of my Senate career.""
http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/26/sen-bob-corker-not-seek-re-election-next-year/678088001/
about corker
http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/politics/2017/09/26/sen-bob-corker-not-seek-re-election-next-year/678088001/
that quote... certainly sounds like he has to vote on something in the next 15 months and not worry about getting re-elected. something that would probably kill his ability to get re-elected.
is that a whif of impeachment?
What part of Trump's agenda has passed, in general? The (little) senate's work over the last few months has largely been the product of the senate, and as such has been conservative/republican type shit. Why wouldn't he vote for it.
Complaints about republicans voting for "Trump's agenda" never made sense to me. He's a republican (at least on paper), they're republicans...they're going to pass republican stuff.
I'd rather have Corker there during any type of investigation of Trump than Blackburn though, that's for sure.
#DraftGoreI actually like e Democrat running for the Tennessee seat.
I think I agree with this, and that quote from Corker about the next 15 months is bizarre. Does he have a spot already reserved in the administration? Is he talking about something more?
Well, I guess it's time to at least start cleaning up the bunker, in case it's happening soon
He's on foreign relations committee so he might have some knowledge the rest of us don't.
North Korea or after today something in Iraq/Kurdistan. Or simply Russia investigation leading to larger revelations.
When are the primary results today going to be announced?
Rubber-stamping cabinet picks? Anyone who could have been the killing vote against devos and chose not to can't really be called reasonable.
Killing the last vote on screwing health care before it came down to McCain's WWE entrance?
I guess haven't watched him during any committee meetings to see where his sliminess is on a scale of one to gowdy, but there's a level of contempt for the average person involved in baseline Republican policy that my response to the assertion that he's not extreme was "what did I miss?" If those remarks are impeachment hints I'll be thrilled to be wrong.
SPicer just hired a lawyer who specialized in congressional investigations and foregin corrupt practices...
Well, I can take comfort in knowing they cant govern at all. Its not a Corker who would prevent dumb shit from passing through this current senate. Cant say Im concerned about it. Would be nice to see a proper fight for the seat however.Welp, that quote is loaded. I can't imagine that being said without him knowing stuff that we don't. The real question is as head of the Foreign Relations Committee what exactly he means. Impeachment? Even more Sanctions?
I think his general point is that if you're a McCain or a Bernie, you've spent so long working in federal government that it changes how you think. There's no (relative) shame in wanting to tap out.
That being said, the fact that a "moderate"could be replaced by yet another madman from the Teaparty is scary
He JUST did this? lmao
http://www.thedailybeast.com/sean-spicer-hires-a-lawyer
link to spicer hiring a lawyer
also
RNC is NOT paying for this, its coming out of spicers pocket. guess he's flippin
Somehow shell be for it a year from now. Sounds about right, totally.https://mobile.twitter.com/ryangrim/status/912776406731575296
Everybody's favorite non-senator Rick Santorum thinks Murkowski will support a new Graham-Cassidy in 2018.
Even pessimistic me would lean against that one.
https://mobile.twitter.com/ryangrim/status/912776406731575296
Everybody's favorite non-senator Rick Santorum thinks Murkowski will support a new Graham-Cassidy in 2018.
Even pessimistic me would lean against that one.
CNN reporting the IRS refused to participate in Mueller's raid on Manafort's home...
Because it might have interfered with an existing IRS investigation into Manafort.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/sean-spicer-hires-a-lawyer
link to spicer hiring a lawyer
also
RNC is NOT paying for this, its coming out of spicers pocket. guess he's flippin
Oh shit!
OHYEAHHHH!!!