Aaron Strife
Banned
Only real socialist aliveyes u aren't a real socialist unless u abandon all ur earthly possessions and live in a swamp
NOOOOOOOOFalse, shrek is quite clearly into private property.
Only real socialist aliveyes u aren't a real socialist unless u abandon all ur earthly possessions and live in a swamp
NOOOOOOOOFalse, shrek is quite clearly into private property.
Also, punctuation.yes u aren't a real socialist unless u abandon all ur earthly possessions and live in a swamp
In case you needed the fear of God put into you: The Republican Party Isnt Cracking Up. Its Getting Even Stronger.
I like it, his first episode with the Alex Jones comments was hilarious.
He's like a more ridiculous Colbert report
an example: http://news.gallup.com/poll/191354/americans-views-socialism-capitalism-little-changed.aspxAlso, punctuation.
But more like a lot of people say they're X Y or Z. And even believe they are. Without knowing what it means or actually actioning anything, or acting in the opposite of what they ostensibly call themselves.
Those first 3 things are really popular even though "capitalism" is not!Just off the top of your head, would you say you have a positive or negative image of each of the following? (% Positive)
May 2-4, 2016 v Nov. 18-19, 2012 v Jan. 26-27, 2010
Small business 96 95 95
Entrepreneurs 87 86 84
Free enterprise 85 89 86
Capitalism 60 61 61
Big business 53 58 49
The federal government 44 51 46
Socialism 35 39 36
In case you needed the fear of God put into you: The Republican Party Isnt Cracking Up. Its Getting Even Stronger.
Probably because "capitalism" now tends to imply you aren't allowed to regulate the industries or stop it from devouring itself and all its competition.an example: http://news.gallup.com/poll/191354/americans-views-socialism-capitalism-little-changed.aspx
Those first 3 things are really popular even though "capitalism" is not!
YouTube really fucking sucks. They need to block all of this tinfoil hat wearing bullshit. Enough is enough. DO SOMETHING. They can survive without it.@Walldo
As a reader just pointed out, it's been two days and the third YouTube result for "las vegas shooting" is a false flag video with a million+ views.
A day of ups and downs for Google:
Pluses: They annunced a new phone that is a solid, iterative update.
Minuses: They are actively destroying democracy.
YouTube really fucking sucks. They need to block all of this tinfoil hat wearing bullshit. Enough is enough. DO SOMETHING. They can survive without it.
@Walldo
As a reader just pointed out, it's been two days and the third YouTube result for "las vegas shooting" is a false flag video with a million+ views.
A day of ups and downs for Google:
Pluses: They annunced a new phone that is a solid, iterative update.
Minuses: They are actively destroying democracy.
In other news, a White House duder wants us to move away from SSNs as identification.
Would be nice to see this happen at some point in our collective lifetimes.
I 100% agree with this. This is exactly what strong leftist organizations should be trying to do. The other thing I would recommend them doing is actually just joining the local Democratic Party and taking over the local levers of power, which is happening in some places, but I think could happen more.
@Walldo
As a reader just pointed out, it's been two days and the third YouTube result for "las vegas shooting" is a false flag video with a million+ views.
A day of ups and downs for Google:
Pluses: They annunced a new phone that is a solid, iterative update.
Minuses: They are actively destroying democracy.
Yup, though methinks the DSA probably knows this and hopefully cooler heads prevail or else they'll be largely irrelevant like they were before.I think one of the less talked about advantages of this is that parties outside of the two-party system are vulnerable to nut jobs and people with no political tact (the "from the river to the sea" people), while established parties mostly run them off. If DSA people join these major parties instead of standing on their own, they'll gain some measure of selectivity that they don't even realize they needed.
The Libertarians clearly need this advice as well (insert link to the guy stripping at the Lib National Convention).
Okay, so I read the article and I dunno. A model of the "Democratic loyalists" that lumps together Jamelle Bouie and Jonathan Chait has some immediately obvious flaws, but beyond that, it doesn't actually seem to be saying anything?
This article seems to be written from the perspective of somebody who is neither left nor liberal nor, indeed, political at all. Which explains why the conclusion is simply "both sides should get along."
In turn, the biggest asset of the Sanders campaign is that it almost won.
Talking heads are now going to start using Burr's statement that Russia was just try to sow chaos and were trying to affect both sides.
Alternatively, pundits could say investigators have been putting in countless hours but still don't have anything material on the current POTUS. Pres. Obama wouldn't have handed over the keys of power if there was more to the Russia story that implicates his successor. Additionally, Pres. Obama wouldn't have left advice, attended the inauguration or pretended to be civil while in the same room with Pres. Trump if this narrative was true. Moreover, if Pres. Trump was guilty of something like that, then there's no way he'd be wrapping up his first year as one of the most powerful individuals on Earth. He would've been gone before he was even inaugurated.
Moreover, if Pres. Trump was guilty of something like that, then there's no way he'd be wrapping up his first year as one of the most powerful individuals on Earth. He would've been gone before he was even inaugurated.
Anyone catch Rebecca Traister's write-up in NY Magazine about Elizabeth Warren?
https://www.thecut.com/2017/09/elizabeth-warren-hillary-clinton-sexism.html
Talking heads are now going to start using Burr's statement that Russia was just try to sow chaos and were trying to affect both sides.
My guess is there's some soft Gillespie support there and they either show up on Election Day and it's 53-47 or they don't and the gap widens a bit.Northam won't win by that much, but it will be 6-8%
Clinton Country.God I hope I was wrong and this is right. Please.
WaPo VA Gov
http://wapo.st/2xiw470
Northam (D): 53
Gillespie (R): 40
Hyra (L): 4
Trump:
Approve: 33
Disapprove: 59
This was showing up in the earliest poll showing Northam slightly ahead. Gillespie was winning Rs and Is and it didn't matter.Democrats appear to have an edge on engagement this year. A 67 percent majority of Democratic registered voters say they are absolutely certain to vote or have already cast an absentee ballot, compared with 57 percent of Republicans.
This dynamic, along with greater levels of past election turnout, is one reason Northam's 10-point advantage with registered voters stands at 13 points among likely voters. In the June primary election, Democratic voters outnumbered Republicans by a roughly 3-to-2 margin.
edit: Anecdotally, someone I know in NoVA who volunteered for Hillary has been indundated with requests to help. At least locally, they're at work here.(AMONG REGISTERED VOTERS) Who do you think would do a better job making needed compromises across party lines, (Northam) or (Gillespie)?
Hide Results
Detailed View
Northam
41
%
Gillespie
31
~~~ Soros ~~~Has anyone explained why there'd be a false flag massacre during a GOP-GOP-GOP federal government alignment?
Doctor Ralph Northam.
Doctor Ralph Northam.
Dr.
Pediatrician
Did we mention he's a doctor?
(This was noticeable in the very first campaign materials, but jesus that # is way higher than I would've thought, even with the crap in DC)
Doctor Ralph Northam.
Dr.
Pediatrician
Did we mention he's a doctor?
(This was noticeable in the very first campaign materials, but jesus that # is way higher than I would've thought, even with the crap in DC)
Well at least in 4 years we can nominate a real Democrat. As long as Northam wins.
Doctor Ralph Northam.
Dr.
Pediatrician
Did we mention he's a doctor?
(This was noticeable in the very first campaign materials, but jesus that # is way higher than I would've thought, even with the crap in DC)
Has anyone explained why there'd be a false flag massacre during a GOP-GOP-GOP federal government alignment? You'd need a dem supermajority in the senate to get even the tiniest, smallest, dumbest thing passed. We couldn't even agree to terror watch list background checks for fuck sake. Any new rapidfire mod legislation will die, too, and even if it inexplicably got through congress Trump would veto it.
It's the absolute dumbest possible time to pull this kind of conspiracy. Also, fuck YouTube.
If they were thinking logically they wouldn't be propagating false flag stories tbf! The Deep State is the new boogeyman now.
At least hes being consistent with his bullshit.He finally watched the press conference on his TiVo.
Not even kidding, YouTube was suggesting more misleading videos than they were legit ones regarding the shooting, including ones that blamed Obama and said the shooter is related to Justice Ginsburg.Pretty much. They could at least moderate the stuff that pops in the first few pages of popular search terms.
Not even kidding, YouTube was suggesting more misleading videos than they were legit ones regarding the shooting, including ones that blamed Obama and said the shooter is related to Justice Ginsburg.
This is completely out of hand and infuriating.