avaya said:Women are not stupid.
I agree, but that is not how it is going to be played in the media. Clinton could defend herself, and even she had stories circulating about how she was being unfairly treated in the media, and that Barack's attacks against her were sexist.reilo said:If she cannot handle a VP debate because someone was being "too harsh" on her and that Biden ought to play "nicer" to her because she is a woman, then that is proof-positive that she doesn't deserve to be in politics.
Hillary has a place in politics because she hasn't let the fact that she is a woman get in way of her ambitions.
I'm not advocating that Biden should be throwing off misogynistic slurs at her, but if he says something harsh to her, it should be because he disagrees with her campaign's policies, not because she is a woman. If Biden gets in trouble for saying something that is true, then fuck politics.
A couple of articles I read said that the only real danger for Biden is that if he destroys her too much in the debate it could come across as him bullying her and be unsympathetic. It does seem like a grossly comical mismatch, particularly when it inevitably comes to foreign policy and national security issues. This ain't a bake sale.reilo said:Todd Harris: "I think Palin will win the VP debate."
Okay.
I love her amateur comment. Very funny.reilo said:Fuck you Mathews. Asshole put a PUMA on his show.
Quit giving them airtime.
besada said:Some, just like their male counterparts, are. I'm listening to one of the PUMA leaders, this very second, talking about how wonderful she is.
laserbeam said:If she is Anti-Peta I think thats someone we can all support
besada said:Some, just like their male counterparts, are. I'm listening to one of the PUMA leaders, this very second, talking about how wonderful she is.
soul creator said:jack cafferty just said CNN last night had higher ratings than the F-Word network and "MSNBRQZ"
wtf :lol
Riddler said:I dont think the american public will be fooled twice & sway the win based on Christians. Not when people are getting hurt where it counts and thats in the pocketbook. Money will trump religion for most 100% of the time. Its sad, but its the truth.
The idea that someone would terminate their child because of a disability is reprehensible to me and I'm pro-choice. I can't believe anyone is making it out like this. I'd rather no reason be cited at all.Stoney Mason said:That might be the worst most obnoxious phrasing for a pro-life stance I've ever seen.
Chiggs said:Agree 100% with this post. A lot of people just can't seem to get past the fact that this country is religious, and the issue of abortion will supercede stuff like foreign policy, experience, etc, etc.
Once you get past that, it's easy to see why this choice made sense. Abortion is the single most divisive issue in this country. But on this forum, most people think abortion is fine and dandy, so that when the issue comes up they're stumped as to why it's even an issue. This is what happens when you surround yourself with people that share similar viewpoints. Lack of perspective.
Sure, but vagina voters are.avaya said:Women are not stupid.
Like I said, I'm gonna love the debates. To paraphrase Luke Wilson in Anchorman, Biden is gonna straight up murder her ass.Gary Whitta said:A couple of articles I read said that the only real danger for Biden is that if he destroys her too much in the debate it could come across as him bullying her and be unsympathetic. It does seem like a grossly comical mismatch, particularly when it inevitably comes to foreign policy and national security issues. This ain't a bake sale.
greepoman said:If abortion ever got outlawed would in-vitro be next?
reilo said:PUMAs are a fringe group that represent a statistically insignificant segment of the electorate.
VPhys said:She is against abortion?
I'd hit it,RAW
soul creator said:jack cafferty just said CNN last night had higher ratings than the F-Word network and "MSNBRQZ"
wtf :lol
besada said:I do not disagree. But you're acting like they don't exist, which is simply not true. I don't think anyone's suggesting that Palin is going to draw huge numbers of women, but she will pull the fringe people from the bitterest of the Clintonistas, and she'll energize the existing female pro-life voters.
Like I've said previously, I think it's the best McCain could hope for. Before Palin he wasn't going to get as many PUMA people and the pro-life base didn't trust him. He's helped himself in both small constituencies without damaging his chances with other existing constituencies.
Giuliani would have completely lost him the pro-life vote.
Romney would have cost him big numbers in the South.
Lieberman would have torn the party apart.
Pawlenty was a safe pick, but was nearly as obscure as Palin and didn't bring the kinds of pro-life credentials Palin does.
I've never suggested she's perfect, by any stretch, but she brings some minor positives and virtually no negatives, which is why she's a fairly good pick for VP politically.
avaya said:Bit of a downgrade from Theuriau.
SpeedingUptoStop said:Biden is gonna straight up murder her ass.
I wouldn't doubt it.reilo said:PUMA: "She's not running for president, she's running for president."
Are you really this fucking stupid?
In my experience, most in the middle are pro-choice but find abortion kinda icky.Chiggs said:Now here's a question. Depends on how fanatical the people outlawing it would be, I guess.
thekad said:I honestly don't even know why McCain decided to gamble with this pick. They must think their convention is going to be a disaster.
besada said:I do not disagree. But you're acting like they don't exist, which is simply not true. I don't think anyone's suggesting that Palin is going to draw huge numbers of women, but she will pull the fringe people from the bitterest of the Clintonistas, and she'll energize the existing female pro-life voters.
Like I've said previously, I think it's the best McCain could hope for. Before Palin he wasn't going to get as many PUMA people and the pro-life base didn't trust him. He's helped himself in both small constituencies without damaging his chances with other existing constituencies.
Giuliani would have completely lost him the pro-life vote.
Romney would have cost him big numbers in the South.
Lieberman would have torn the party apart.
Pawlenty was a safe pick, but was nearly as obscure as Palin and didn't bring the kinds of pro-life credentials Palin does.
I've never suggested she's perfect, by any stretch, but she brings some minor positives and virtually no negatives, which is why she's a fairly good pick for VP politically.
Y2Kev said:This PUMA chick is shiteous. LOL at Palin is moderate and a thinking person.
I always thought that sixaxis was a cool invention from sony.lexdysia said:McCain just pulled a Sixaxis to Obama's Wii-Mote.
lexdysia said:McCain just pulled a Sixaxis to Obama's Wii-Mote.
laserbeam said:Palin has been pretty moderate of course Abortion has become the end all be all topic so she is an evil partisan.
reilo said:The thing is, she brings in more positives to a group that already would have voted for him.
Palin is very pro life, pro gun, wants to drill in ANWR, come on.laserbeam said:Palin has been pretty moderate of course Abortion has become the end all be all topic so she is an evil partisan.
lexdysia said:McCain just pulled a Sixaxis to Obama's Wii-Mote.
VPhys said:
Door2Dawn said:I always thought that sixaxis was a cool invention from sony.