beelzebozo
Jealous Bastard
hell of a review. i'm very interested, despite gta aversion.
both. It'll have a nice sp campaign, with lots of side stuff to do (lots of people reporting doing things like playing poker or hunting animals for hours at a time), then add in multiple online modes, and you've got a nice balanced game that should give hundreds of hours of fun.deathsight580 said:So is this game more of a play online with your friends game or more of a SP game? I'm trying to decide if I should get this day 1 or wait for a price drop.
deathsight580 said:So is this game more of a play online with your friends game or more of a SP game? I'm trying to decide if I should get this day 1 or wait for a price drop.
Both....whatever you feel like at the time.deathsight580 said:So is this game more of a play online with your friends game or more of a SP game? I'm trying to decide if I should get this day 1 or wait for a price drop.
beelzebozo said:hell of a review. i'm very interested, despite gta aversion.
ACE 1991 said:New York Times RDR review popped up.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/arts/television/17dead.html?pagewanted=1&ref=arts&adxnnlx=1274040389-CuFVDLWDBDlpDF6qkY2xnA
NYT said:Along the way, he and his creators conjure such a convincing, cohesive and enthralling reimagination of the real world that it sets a new standard for sophistication and ambition in electronic gaming.
In the more than 1,100 articles I have written for this newspaper since 1996, I have never before called anything a tour de force. Yet there is no more succinct and appropriate way to describe Red Dead Redemption. Rockstar rides again.
NYTimes said:Red Dead Redemption teems with characters you may never forget. Of course I am sure it is purely a coincidence that the addled, Gollumlike grave robber that Marston enlists on his mission is named Seth. Rockstars creative trademark has always been a mordant, knowing wit.
Review writer's namesoldat7 said:Seth? Why is that significant?
soldat7 said:Seth? Why is that significant?
New York Times Byline said:By SETH SCHIESEL
Published: May 16, 2010
soldat7 said:Seth? Why is that significant?
"Along the way, he and his creators conjure such a convincing, cohesive and enthralling reimagination of the real world that it sets a new standard for sophistication and ambition in electronic gaming."
PowderedToast said:oh fuck off
Bu but Oscar-worthy story.PowderedToast said:oh fuck off
szaromir said:Bu but Oscar-worthy story.
Technology
While GTA IV was hailed as a crowning achievement in technology for the open-world genre with its expansive and detailed world, physics system and Euphoria, the game engine Rockstar North used was actually developed by Rockstar San Diego. The RAGE engine was originally built for Red Dead Redemption (and was shown off in tech-demo form at E3 in 2005), but has since found itself as the company's staple development architecture; evolving as needed to cater for anything being built within the collective Rockstar studios' walls. What this means, however, is that while the engine is available to everyone within Rockstar, the team who know it best are clearly the guys who built it. And all the while it was being tweaked and moulded to bring us GTA IV, San Diego were in development with Red Dead Redemption; learning from mistakes or shortcomings essentially tested with GTA IV.
WreckTheLaw said:Not sayin' it is, haven't played it, but what if it were true?
If it's true, then greatWreckTheLaw said:Not sayin' it is, haven't played it, but what if it were true?
ACE 1991 said:New York Times RDR review popped up.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/arts/television/17dead.html?pagewanted=1&ref=arts&adxnnlx=1274040389-CuFVDLWDBDlpDF6qkY2xnA
ACE 1991 said:Where did the whole "oscar worthy story" thing come from? was it a quote from the press, or just something that forum posters screamed?
NY Times said:In the more than 1,100 articles I have written for this newspaper since 1996, I have never before called anything a tour de force. Yet there is no more succinct and appropriate way to describe Red Dead Redemption. Rockstar rides again.
EDIT: yep, it was Hilary Goldstein.Dabanton said:IGN review.
And it's been used to bash the game ever since.
The review had many more false statements - it's obvious why the review was posted before review embargo and after half a year of IGN-exclusive GTA4 previews. I'm really surprised it never escalated into a bigger scandal.Dabanton said:IGN review.
And it's been used to bash the game ever since.
Dude Abides said:Good to see New York Times is still bigger than a stupid review embargo.
ACE 1991 said:Where did the whole "oscar worthy story" thing come from? was it a quote from the press, or just something that forum posters screamed?
Camper182 said:could i PLEASE get a good quality stream in a PM, everytime i ask for it, i get ignored.
NotTheGuyYouKill said:Someone said that you just have to tap it lightly, not go all the way.
miladesn said:EDIT: yep, it was Hilary Goldstein.
GTA IV gives us characters and a world with a level of depth previously unseen in gaming and elevates its story from a mere shoot-em-up to an Oscar-caliber drama.
Dabanton said:IGN review.
And it's been used to bash the game ever since.
Cant0na said:it will put oscar winning movies to shame then
am i right
jet1911 said:
Dabanton said:
by Hilary Goldstein
Hopefully not as bad as generators in JC2....Definity said:Holy Shit at these treasure maps...I can't find a darn thing by looking at them. :lol
This will prove to be a good challenge for all the folks looking to go for 100%.
Damn, you can find buried treasure in the game!?!Definity said:Holy Shit at these treasure maps...I can't find a darn thing by looking at them. :lol
This will prove to be a good challenge for all the folks looking to go for 100%.
BenjaminBirdie said:Doesn't take much..