Thought it was a reference/wordplay on the name Victoria.i'm guessing that it is random samurai shodown II reference
Thought it was a reference/wordplay on the name Victoria.i'm guessing that it is random samurai shodown II reference
I disagree with you completely. So you are saying that of all people in an organisation, from the cleaners to the CEO, that of all these people that the CEO position is the least scrutinised or someone they spend the least time researching /interviewing for?I'm not at all sure what you're talking about, but CEOs are the least "examined" people in any industry.
I guarantee you she will not only land another position relatively quickly, but probably quite high up if not CEO in the next position.
Almost every CEO that I've ever heard of has a golden parachute. And, especially in business, it has nothing to do with what you've done - it's all about "who you know". Don't believe me? Look up the former CEO of American Airlines. Dude literally ran the company into bankruptcy, got close to 8Mil to bail AND was still a board member. He's now a board member at Wal-Mart and Qualcomm. If you look at his original golden parachute, he asked for 20Mil.
20Mil because he ran a company into bankruptcy.
This story is not uncommon for CEOs in the US. Pao will come out of this smelling like lots of things, but shit isn't one of them. Seriously - google "golden parachute" and see where any number of CEOs have landed afterwards.
I disagree with you completely. So you are saying that of all people in an organisation, from the cleaners to the CEO, that of all these people that the CEO position is the least scrutinised or someone they spend the least time researching /interviewing for?
Im not saying there are not anomalies and I have no doubt that in the near future she will get another job, but there is no way that other organisations won't be warned over what she has been involved in within the last year or so.
Yes there is apparently. She might actually personify the worst villan sterotype ever. Not those Bond ones but like the rich corporate ones. Emotionless robot who is well, a total asshole to people. Though that doesn't excuse Reddit at all.Is there actually strong conclusive evidence to support these allegations?
In a thread full of hatred over this women because some other man fired someone, I find it a little hard to just automatically accept un-sourced statements like this.
I have to believe there's a little (or a lot of) nuance between reality and this portrayal which could be easily confused with an unimaginative caricature of a one-sided evil mastermind.
The OP suggests that the board wanted to make money more aggressively and she stepped down because she disagreed. The main criticism against Pao is that she is making decisions that are bad for the community in order to make the site more money. Unless you think the explanation is a lie, isn't this "bad" even if you don't like her, because her board-appointed replacement would be even more aggressive with trying to make money?
I disagree with you completely. So you are saying that of all people in an organisation, from the cleaners to the CEO, that of all these people that the CEO position is the least scrutinised or someone they spend the least time researching /interviewing for?
Im not saying there are not anomalies and I have no doubt that in the near future she will get another job, but there is no way that other organisations won't be warned over what she has been involved in within the last year or so.
PAO! In the face.
People really, honestly believe the delusional narrative that Ellen Pao was single-handedly pushing these changes...instead of the reality, where the board is trying to clear the pond scum out of Reddit, so businesses might actually want to associate and advertise with the site.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...estifies-of-conflicts-with-several-co-workers
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...2-7-million-not-appeal-discrimination-n370811
https://np.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/3c0idl/i_am_dacvak_former_reddit_employee_and_leukemia/ (now deleted)
http://www.businessinsider.com/reddit-doesnt-negotiate-salaries-ellen-pao-2015-6
She seemed like a bad fit for the role and some real bad shit happened under her watch. Leaving was the right call.
That being said the new person in charge should continue shutting down the nasty subs. Shutting down a handful of them and not the others just highlighted the problem. The site will be fine without that stuff.
Its unlikely the board set any sort of direction like "get rid of the hateful subreddits", they don't have that sort of insight or interest in the company. They just tell the CEO "we want you to IPO/be bought in 2-3 years, make incremental growth of at least 20% QoQ for the next 18 months". Extremely high level goals based on their own past with what growth companies should look like financially for a prospectus/buyout.
I really hope they will be even more ruthless under the new old CEO and remove all the vile and disgusting subreddits. It would be nice for the assholes on there to see that they haven't accomplished anything.
Well that's disappointing.
Still interesting though how male CEOs never get this level of vitriol, isn't it? Certainly not gendered insults. And a few of those things (not the Leukemia thing) would be described as positive attributes if it were a male CEO doing them.
Disturbing all the shit that gets thrown at her, even on here. Would've been nice if they kept all the toxic stuff limited to reddit, but some people seemed determined to spread it as many sites, games and channels as possible.
I wonder if the next CEO will be blamed as an individual for every decision Reddit makes as a company.
Whether Ellen Pao is a terrible CEO or human being is irrelevant. She got especially shat on by the reddit masses because she's a woman.
Of course there was a sizable amount of backlash when those subs were taken down but Wong didn't get his face plastered all over the front page with swastikas and racial and sexist epithets for an entire week.
Do you understand what CEOs are?
Yep. Its going to be nice to see the reaction to Reddit "censoring" more shitty subreddits and going through with other decisions that that audience won't like as part of strengthening its advertising value in the future. I bet Pao will still be blamed years later.She accomplished exactly what she needed to. Pao was an interim CEO after all, and was the perfect scapegoat. She did some things a few people liked, and some other things that people hated. She may have had absolutely zero to do with Victoria's dismissal. But it doesn't matter as she started the initial changes at Reddit, took the flak, and now she's being replaced by a "white-knight", crowd-favorite, new CEO who will look like a godsend but in reality will continue the same policies that people have been protesting.
Looks like she did her job iMO.
Reddit's most loved employee ever is also a woman. Stop being dumb.Whether Ellen Pao is a terrible CEO or human being is irrelevant. She got especially shat on by the reddit masses because she's a woman.
Not at all. Pretty stupid thing to say. It probably had more to do with her being what most would consider a bad person, if you read up on her lawsuit. The discovery on that was pretty damning. Her being a terrible person in the eyes of the public is entirely relevant. So is her being responsible for all the wrongdoings for the last few months in the minds of the users.
Unless you mean to tell me that people went out of their way to hate on (pretending she's not a CEO or terrible person) an innocent woman. Not buying it.
When that happened, the backlash was minimal. Only a handful of people even cared that those subs disappeared. Most agreed that it was a good thing, or completely understandable.
Pao has been outright censoring posts - even tame ones - about her case or her husband's case. She fired a beloved member of the community for questionable reasons, and had apparently been causing a divide between admins and mods for quite some time. The backlash was large because it was built up over time and included people close to the situation that couldn't take it anymore. It was a very large, very public meltdown.
Also, the NeoGAF hate sub got banned despite it being an extremely small community compared to other hate subreddits.
Reddit's most loved employee ever is also a woman. Stop being dumb.
Reddit's problem is that it relies on unpaid "pond scum" to do the heavy lifting and keep costs down. They are never going to be able to police everything when the entire corporate head count is ninety people. They are trying to have it both ways, and it blew up in their faces.People really, honestly believe the delusional narrative that Ellen Pao was single-handedly pushing these changes...instead of the reality, where the board is trying to clear the pond scum out of Reddit, so businesses might actually want to associate and advertise with the site.
So glad that the horribly racist and misogynistic portion of reddit's userbase can now claim victory.
Truly the darkest timeline.
I don't know if keeping the CEO that was alienating the entire user base that your business relies upon and threatening to drive the site against a wall would have been the wiser move here
You gotta pity them a bit though, knowing that sometime soon they're going to realize that there were much more problematic elements in the high-ups at Reddit than Pao.
Is there a cliff notes version I can read about the gives details on what is going on?
The problem is: why did those terrible subreddits get shut down, when a bunch of other terrible subreddits were allowed to prosper?
They other problem is: ban /fatpeoplehate and they just create a bunch of new similar subreddits, or worse, take over r/pics or something.
Congrats, racist/sexist manchildren of the world.
Here's how reddit works, its a platform for allowing people to host their own communities if you will. Now the mods of a subreddit are in charge of enforcing what ever rules and ideals they wish on their own subreddit(as long as its legal). However the admins and higher ups get involved when they stray out of their lane and start fucking with other people.
To go with your example, if they were to try and take over r/pics it would be down to the r/pics mods to sort it out within their subreddit and the admins would go about closing down their subreddit.
and congrats to all the other people who had legitimate concerns who also pitched in!
Yeah, I just don't get the racism/sexism complaints either. The CEO before her was Asian and that was never an issue. And the straw that broke the camel's back was the firing of a female anyway.
It seems pretty clear to me that she was so unpopular because she came in with what seems like strong-armed corporate tactics to a place that is decidedly anti-corporate.
i don't doubt it for a second. But i felt there were many elements involved and attributing it all to that sort of right wing conspiracy is a bit disingenuous. i feel that because of her gender and being a minority somehow diminishes what people can say about her questionable background. Maybe because they fear that her faults will taint the field for future prospects of minority CEOs.
or the fact that some racists/sexist people made some comments means that those with legitimate complaints or reservations run the risk of being lumped in the same group. because reasons.
and for that, she MUST be protected or people's reservations of her be put under a major magnifying glass.
that's why i, with a bit of tin foil hattery, am now starting to think she was propped up to be a fall guy for the background dealings in reddit for an inevitable shakeup on the fundamentals of the what site was built on.
taking a page from politician handbook, introduce a major or extremely unpopular policy, test the field with the uproar from the public, and introduce a seemingly less strict policy which was the original/intended plan. it won't look as extreme, and will be more easily swallowed.
Well, like I said- there were a lot of nasty people who had it out for her since day one for various reasons, and they poured a lot of fuel on the fire of the past week. But there are plenty of problems that have gone on with the site since she started that have nothing to do with her or anyone else's race, gender, or personal ideology (most notably the firing that ignited this shitstorm in the first place,) so acting like she was ousted solely because of some vast misogynist conspiracy is ridiculous.Yeah, I just don't get the racism/sexism complaints either. The CEO before her was Asian and that was never an issue. And the straw that broke the camel's back was the firing of a female anyway.
It seems pretty clear to me that she was so unpopular because she came in with what seems like strong-armed corporate tactics to a place that is decidedly anti-corporate.
Yep.
But really that's the folly of Reddit's owners. They've got an immensely popular site that is built on bedrocks incompatible with turning it into a moneymaking enterprise, and their only asset is those people that show up.
Absolutely. Shadowbanning is for spammers. I created it ten years ago when we were in an arms race with automated spambots, which still attack us constantly. I want it to be as difficult as possible for the spammers to know when they've been caught so that they don't improve their tech.
Real users should never be shadowbanned. Ever. If we, or moderators, ban them, or specific content, it will be obvious that it's happened and there will be a mechanism for appealing the decision.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying.
<rant>Also, I hate seeing [deleted] all over the place. I don't care if it was deleted, I want to read it anyway.</rant>