FortuneFaded
Member
Okay point.
Davydenko, the man who never even made a slam final, and Nalbandian, the man who only made one slam final and promptly lost it to Hewitt 6-1, 6-3, 6-2? Ferrer did better against Nadal at Roland Garros. Re-read that last sentence. Ferrer did better against Nadal at Roland Garros than Nalbandian did in his only slam final.
I don't know why anyone cares about this match. Our lord and saviour Clayray will vanquish whichever force of evil prevails from this sordid encounter.
I don't know why anyone cares about this match. Our lord and saviour Clayray will vanquish whichever force of evil prevails from this sordid encounter.
You're the first one here to say that reaching a final or even winning a slam isn't the ultimate mesure of the talent/potential of a player. I expected better arguments from you.