Maklershed
Member
Thats cool and all and maybe I don't understand the importance/benefit of it but wouldn't it be better if he used all that money to actually send a rocket to space?
Solar Tornado, 5 times the size of earth.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/...lar-tornadoes-biggest-nasa-sdo-space-science/
Good news everyone! We ARE the father (of the moon)! http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120329124722.htm
More Tyson:
Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson on being a living 'badass' meme - On The Verge episode 004
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-sp1QyieuMg
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9IQrJ7C2LI&feature=relmfu
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghLa9rwZQVI&feature=relmfu
edit. I know not really space related but didn't really want to do another thread for it :/
More Tyson:
Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson on being a living 'badass' meme - On The Verge episode 004
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-sp1QyieuMg
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9IQrJ7C2LI&feature=relmfu
Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghLa9rwZQVI&feature=relmfu
edit. I know not space related but didn't want to do another thread for it :/
Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson doesn't mind that "Titanic" film director James Cameron called him a "son of a bitch" for shaming him into correcting the movie's constellations.
"I take it as a frustrated expression of affection," Tyson, director of New York's Hayden Planetarium, told me today. "As in, 'you son of a bitch, you got me there.'"
In a widely quoted interview with the British magazine Culture, Cameron said the sky scene was the only shot he fixed for this year's 3-D re-release:
"It's because Neil deGrasse Tyson, who is one of the U.S.' leading astronomers, sent me quite a snarky email saying that, at that time of year, in that position in the Atlantic in 1912, when Rose is lying on the piece of driftwood and staring up at the stars, that is not the star field she would have seen, and with my reputation as a perfectionist, I should have known that and I should have put the right star field in.
"So I said, 'All right, you son of a b**ch, send me the right stars for the exact time, 4:20 a.m. on April 15, 1912, and I'll put it in the movie.' So that's the one shot that has been changed."
Yeah, I've seen many interviews with Neil on that issue, was pretty hilarious to see him tell his story. I think there's a good Stephen Colbert interview where he tells it all. Fun to see he finally got his wish.
Stephen Colbert Interviews Neil deGrasse Tyson at Montclair Kimberley Academy - 2010-Jan-29. It's great interview, nice to see Colbert out of his persona every now and then.
Stephen Colbert Interviews Neil deGrasse Tyson at Montclair Kimberley Academy - 2010-Jan-29. It's great interview, nice to see Colbert out of his persona every now and then.
Stephen Colbert Interviews Neil deGrasse Tyson at Montclair Kimberley Academy - 2010-Jan-29. It's great interview, nice to see Colbert out of his persona every now and then.
"With better detectors and instruments designed to block the glare of the parent stars, these next-generation telescopes could not only find a Goldilocks planet, but also tell us what its atmosphere is made of, what sort of cloud cover graces its skies, and maybe even what the surface is like — whether oceans cover part of the globe, how much land there is, and so on," Hudgins said.
Goldilocks Planet May be Found by 2014
The first true "alien Earth" will likely be discovered in the next two years, a NASA scientist says.
Astronomers have found more than 750 alien planets to date, and NASA's Kepler Space Telescope has flagged 2,300 additional "candidates" awaiting confirmation by follow-up studies. This haul has not yet included an Earth-like exoplanet one that's the size of our planet and orbits at the right distance from its star to support liquid water and, possibly, life as we know it.
But that could change soon, according to Shawn Domagal-Goldman, a researcher at NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C. who specializes in exoplanet biology.
"I believe Kepler will find a 'Goldilocks planet' within the next two years," Domagal-Goldman said in a statement. "We'll be able to point at a specific star in the night sky and say 'There it is a planet that could support life!'"
Thought I read recently on Bad Astronomy that Kepler, along with several other NASA missions, was given funding until FY 2016?
Ah yes, correct, although there is a stipulation that Kepler will be "under review" in 2014 (thus interesting that they claim the Goldilocks Planet may be found by then). It's always an unphill battle for these guys.
Whereas Navy superlasers and trillion dollar fighter jets are fully funded and supported. Goddamnit.
Exactly. Humanity WTF is wrong with you?
Read this yesterday and found it interesting http://www.space.com/15166-milky-center-black-hole-sagittariusastar.html
Scientists are close to being able to "see" Sagittarius A*, or the black hole theorized to reside in the center of our galaxy and talks of the Event Horizon Telescope. Fascinating stuff.
Whereas Navy superlasers and trillion dollar fighter jets are fully funded and supported. Goddamnit.
Someone should tell them that there MIGHT be a bigger war in space somewhere, maybe we would be a space race in an eyeblink
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_2216.htmlATV-3 Approaches the Station
In this photo taken from the International Space Station, the European Space Agency’s Automated Transfer Vehicle-3 (ATV-3) is seen on approach for docking. The unmanned cargo spacecraft docked to the space station at 6:31 p.m. EDT on March 28, 2012.
The ATV-3 delivered 220 pounds of oxygen, 628 pounds of water, 4.5 tons of propellant and nearly 2.5 tons of dry cargo. Among other items, the station crew received experiment hardware, spare parts, food and clothing.
The six-member Expedition 30 crew adjusted its sleep schedule to accommodate the ATV-3 docking. The crew stayed up late to monitor the approach and docking.
It should say "We're willing to share unimaginable technology with you but first you must find us and come to us to get it". Which hopefully would lead us all to group together and create that technology ourselves.We need some powerful scientist to construct a fake message from space from some aliens like in Contact but instead of being friendly, it would be saying they are on their way to destroy us.
It should say "We're willing to share unimaginable technology with you but first you must find us and come to us to get it". Which hopefully would lead us all to group together and create that technology ourselves.
Unfortunately it won't happen without an initiatve of this magnitude. The threat of an asteroid would be a good driver as well. But unless our lives are threatened or they find an asteroid made of solid gold, we are gonna be stuck on this rock forever :'(
Wikipedia said:Some day, the platinum, cobalt and other valuable elements from asteroids may even be returned to Earth for profit. At 1997 prices, a relatively small metallic asteroid with a diameter of 1.6 km (0.99 mi) contains more than 20 trillion US dollars worth of industrial and precious metals.
Wikipedia said:A comparatively small M-type asteroid with a mean diameter of 1 km could contain more than two billion metric tons of ironnickel ore, or two to three times the annual production for 2004. The asteroid 16 Psyche is believed to contain 1.7×1019 kg of nickeliron, which could supply the 2004 world production requirement for several million years. A small portion of the extracted material would also be precious metals.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_mining
I really, REALLY wish Obama or some future president would pull a Kennedy, and just pledge a mission to claim and mine said (or any of the other mineral rich asteroids we have found) in under a decade. Mining in space presents such a large set of challenges that it seems somewhat analogous to where the US was starting in the late 1950s with respect to putting a man on the moon. A concise mission like this would present a clear set of problems for engineers, controllers, and designers to overcome, would tap multiple disciplines throughout the economy, and would be much more palatable to politicians because of the economic and political benefits a successful mission would bring. Ignoring the 20 trillion dollar prize itself, the US is already feeling the pressure from China and other emerging nations with regards to price manipulation of rare earth minerals and there is no better source than the asteroid belt itself.
IMO, this is mission that everyone should be pushing for.
I long for the day we get a scientific literate president, or at least have one of his advisors be scientifically driven. I think most presidents are just completely oblivious to these kinds of things, and that probably has more to do with the fact that science in America takes a back seat to everything else (unless of course they need science to aid in warfare).
I long for the day we get a scientific literate president, or at least have one of his advisors be scientifically driven. I think most presidents are just completely oblivious to these kinds of things, and that probably has more to do with the fact that science in America takes a back seat to everything else (unless of course they need science to aid in warfare).
I would expect decades from now, companies probably will be looking to space for resources. Seems only reasonable, and as technology advances, so will the hungry out look for profit.
But that's a variable that's ever-changing as time goes on, and with it great technological advancements.Those resources will have be to worth more than the incredible cost of going out there, harvesting it, and bringing it back.
Whereas Navy superlasers and trillion dollar fighter jets are fully funded and supported. Goddamnit.
Those resources will have be to worth more than the incredible cost of going out there, harvesting it, and bringing it back.
Nudging asteroids into an Earth orbit allows for far easier access.
Oh man, I so do not trust companies with that shit. Who's going to be the BP of space?
Laser technology is directly related to our future in space, and not just as a weapon. Laser sails and laser-ablative propulsion are promising ways to propel spacecraft, and the latter can also be used to launch cargo into space.
The cost is high but the rewards are immense. There are a very large number of asteroids that swing by Earth containing enormous quantities of mineral wealth. Nudging asteroids into an Earth orbit allows for far easier access.