BlackTron
Gold Member
That can't be right, women don't just come to whoever calls on them.
All on-screen Force users happen to be really hot guys
That can't be right, women don't just come to whoever calls on them.
Fifty shades of Sith.All on-screen Force users happen to be really hot guys
4.8m out of 100m+ subs isn't as impressive as they'll crow about in context.It's not exactly the highest rated show ever - far from it - but the viewing figures are enough for Disney to crow about it, and perception is reality. Meaning that this will likely get a second season. And it will be thanks to a bunch of clickbait rage artists and their fans who would rather prop up these terrible shows than let them die a deserved death.
It's become a parasitic industry, where one bunch of arseholes feeds off another, who in turn feed back off of them.
Activism invading pop culture isn't inherently a bad thing, it's the execution that matters.Activism has invaded every aspect of society, it's really a shame. That said, wouldn't have had interest in the show regardless. I'm all Star Wars'd out.
Ultimately the fans will speak with their clicks/wallets.
4.8m out of 100m+ subs isn't as impressive as they'll crow about in context.
I disagree, because activism is having an agenda. That's the very premise of activism. I don't think you can produce the best content you can with an agenda. Especially when in these cases it's not even about trying to say anything. Like some movies and shows have a message they want to get out. These days it's not even trying to get out messages it's just trying to force niche cultural subtleties into your product.Activism invading pop culture isn't inherently a bad thing, it's the execution that matters.
The problem is that instead of offering practical - tried and true - advice about dealing with fundamental and urgent problems, the media is flooded with poor and impractical preaching in an attempt to emphasize issues that are more often than not secondary in their importance.
And even when they do focus on important matters (climate, poverty, abuse etc) the purpose is usually just to "build awareness", which is another way of saying "we have nothing constructive to contribute but hope someone else does". It's very shallow and cynical.
TLJ was agenda driven to shit on OG Star Wars fans and the whole mystique/fun of theories in the lore that spanned generations.I disagree, because activism is having an agenda. That's the very premise of activism. I don't think you can produce the best content you can with an agenda. Especially when in these cases it's not even about trying to say anything. Like some movies and shows have a message they want to get out. These days it's not even trying to get out messages it's just trying to force niche cultural subtleties into your product.
It was a single day though, that’s pretty big numbers.4.8m out of 100m+ subs isn't as impressive as they'll crow about in context.
It's funny because to me it sounds like we're mostly agreeing.I disagree, because activism is having an agenda. That's the very premise of activism. I don't think you can produce the best content you can with an agenda. Especially when in these cases it's not even about trying to say anything. Like some movies and shows have a message they want to get out. These days it's not even trying to get out messages it's just trying to force niche cultural subtleties into your product.
The prequel films are now cherished by comparison.I wish George never sold this fucking franchise to Disney.
In contrast, House of the Dragon drew nearly 10m on a sub service that was less than 97m at the time for a much smaller franchise that HBO also burned the fans the last couple of seasons with a wound still fresh.It was a single day though, that’s pretty big numbers.
I don’t know why people are watching it though. It looks kinda crappy, except the Carey Ann Moss stuff but that was clever marketing as I’m sure lots of people thought she was in the show more.
I guess I don't consider trying to get a message out activism then. To me that's just being thoughtful and opinionated. To me it's activism when the creators try to annoy viewers with their product inundated with things they can't ignore. Even down to the niche aspects of your movie or show. I think most film makers or TV creators are not activists. They are just people with opinions who have something to say and want to share it with people. But when I listen to interviews of some creators these days I see a lot of "Our show is going to have X, Y, and Z, and SO many people are going to be triggered by it hehehe!" That's where I think there's a difference.It's funny because to me it sounds like we're mostly agreeing.
If you sincerely believe in something and have an original and passionate message to convey on the matter, that's extremely beneficial to producing quality content that resonates with people who share your belief.
The original Star Wars films had agenda which they were successfully able to translate into a message that was meaningful to millions. Most of it revolved around personal development, managing your emotions, the importance of friendship, family etc. Very run-of-the-mill stuff. Even environmentalism and democracy were mixed in there for good measure. It could have easily been a preachy and hollow disaster but it was executed in such a way that people fell in love with it.
If, on the other hand, you neither hold a particular belief very strongly, nor have much to say about it, then your content will obviously suffer. This is modern Disney.
Where are we on all these predictions? Any of the supposedly offending eps out yet? I haven't even touched the series and won't until it's all out in the open.
To me at least, despite the very poor writing, they still have something to offer which Disney can not: a compelling and intriguing world, one I'd like to explore. Disney's films are the opposite of that. I haven't seen a single production of theirs that adds anything substantial to Lucas' original vision.The prequel films are now cherished by comparison.
I haven't seen a single production of theirs that adds anything substantial to Lucas' original vision.
In the book, we learn that one of the first meetings to visualize The Force Awakens happened on January 16, 2013 at Skywalker Ranch with George Lucas himself. Among the pieces presented at the meeting were portraits of an older Luke Skywalker training a new disciple named Kira (who was later renamed Rey). The idea was that, 30 years after the fall of the Empire, Luke had gone to a dark place and secluded himself in a Jedi temple on a new planet. The paintings show Luke meditating, reassessing his whole life.
I completely agree with you that having a strong agenda is no substitute for actual talent. Artists who lack the latter may try to compensate by emphasizing the former. But good art has always been the result of crafting a novel and intriguing delivery, rather than about the content of the message. This was as true for Shakespeare and Homer as it is today.I guess I don't consider trying to get a message out activism then. To me that's just being thoughtful and opinionated. To me it's activism when the creators try to annoy viewers with their product inundated with things they can't ignore. Even down to the niche aspects of your movie or show. I think most film makers or TV creators are not activists. They are just people with opinions who have something to say and want to share it with people. But when I listen to interviews of some creators these days I see a lot of "Our show is going to have X, Y, and Z, and SO many people are going to be triggered by it hehehe!" That's where I think there's a difference.
Not sure I understand your point. How does this support the claim that Disney added original elements to Lucas' universe?Yes you did. People rejected it and called it a disaster and a cinematic catastrophe that destroyed the franchise and characters forever.
Star Wars: How George Lucas' Episode VII Outline Became The Last Jedi
George Lucas helped shape Star Wars: The Last Jedi because the film's plot was basically his story for Episode VII.www.denofgeek.com‘The Last Jedi’ Book Reveals George Lucas’ ‘Episode VII’ Idea
A new ‘Star Wars’ art book reveals George Lucas’ original idea and approved designs for the new trilogy that were scrapped.screencrush.com
Daisy Ridley actually filmed for several weeks as "Kira" on TFA. They changed her name to "Rey" when they couldn't trademark "Kira" spelled that way. They were able to later change the spelling to "Qi'ra" for Solo, which they could trademark.
They produced his Episode VII with what they had left over from JJ Abrams' coup attempt. People rejected it and cry that they should've got Lucas' sequels and that Disney threw away his outlines. They didn't and people vehemently HATED his vision for the Sequels.Not sure I understand your point. How does this support the claim that Disney added original elements to Lucas' universe?
I've read it all now.They produced his Episode VII with what they had left over from JJ Abrams' coup attempt.
This is probably true in the universe where Lucas never sold to Disney. But we're not in that universe, so we know better.Rage bait YouTubers are painting a false narrative about Lucas' Sequels, when they would've been hated more than the Special Editions and Prequels combined. It'd be The Last Jedi times 9000.
I've read it all now.
There was already a coup, Kathleen Kennedy and the mind virus board.
Daisy Ridley actually filmed for several weeks as "Kira" on TFA. They changed her name to "Rey" when they couldn't trademark "Kira" spelled that way. They were able to later change the spelling to "Qi'ra" for Solo, which they could trademark.
Ok. So all those "we design our stories by committee and Disney has a strict approval process" they were PRing since buying this franchise, all goes out the window for one man?They hired Michael Arndt to write a script based on George's Episode VII outline. JJ Abrams threw it out (the hunt for Luke element remained which is why Arndt got story credit) to remake ANH because he thought that Bad Robot would then take over Lucasfilm and he'd be in charge of everything especially the merchandise. Which would've never happened.
They hate the "male power fantasy."What I don't understand that it is pretty clear that at this point Star Wars lives and dies by their old fans it just does not resonate with new fans at all as IP. Why they are trying to destroy it the old fanbase?
Ok. So all those "we design our stories by committee and Disney has a strict approval process" they were PRing since buying this franchise, all goes out the window for one man?
Chris Gore of Film Threat claimed that Kathleen Kennedy invented Force Witches in Ahsoka last year to push the "Force is Female" agenda. He's being mocked by other legitimate reviewers because Force Witches have been a thing in Star Wars since Ewoks: Battle for Endor in 1985 and they were named Nightsisters in the novel Courtship of Princess Leia in 1994. They were a big part of the EU after that (you could go to Dathomir and fight them in Star Wars Galaxies), and then GEORGE LUCAS officially made them canon in a 2011 episode of The Clone Wars and then decided that Darth Maul was from their planet as well. Respawn made a Nightsister Kal's love interest in Jedi Fallen Order and Jedi Survivor. They made their live action debut in Season 2 of The Mandalorian (not Ahsoka like Film Threat claimed), and Season 3 deals with them before they flee to hiding on Dathomir.
That narrative about the Story Group was never true. Again, it's from rage bait channels. And they didn't even exist when JJ Abrams was starting his ANH remake.
And they don't really exist much anymore now that Filoni is planning everything and it's starting to show since Filoni is directly retconning things from canon before he was in charge. Kanan's origin in Bad Batch is different than the canon version in the Kanan comic. He's acting the way George did where on-screen trumps everything else. The only problem that he ran into was the two strikes in Hollywood that derailed Mando S4 and turned it into a movie.
Everything post-COVID is Filoni. Bad Batch, New Jedi Order, "Jedi Prime", Heir to the Empire, Mando & Grogu, Skeleton Crew, Acolyte, Ahsoka, etc.
I think we're misunderstanding each other. I was comparing Lucas' prequels with Disney's films. In an alternative universe where he produced his own episode VII-IX, I could judge those products. All I'm saying is that as bad as the prequels' writing was, their world building was novel, intriguing and (to me) has hardly been matched even twenty years later.They produced his Episode VII with what they had left over from JJ Abrams' coup attempt. People rejected it and cry that they should've got Lucas' sequels and that Disney threw away his outlines. They didn't and people vehemently HATED his vision for the Sequels.
And it would've been WORSE had JJ Abrams not returned and Carrie Fisher not passed away. George's original plan for Episode IX (after he killed off Luke in VIII) was almost all about the midichorlians ending with Leia being named the Chosen One and not Anakin (and Kira/Rey still took on the Skywalker name).
Rage bait YouTubers are painting a false narrative about Lucas' Sequels, when they would've been hated more than the Special Editions and Prequels combined. It'd be The Last Jedi times 9000.
We used to farm them thots for mats and crystals in SWG.No shit Sherlock.
Old Luke Han and Leia, new female Luke, Vader jr.,
We used to farm them thots for mats and crystals in SWG.
Episode 3 is out next week.I get that a lot of people don't get the history but this history is not an answer to the question "where are we now with these rumors? are the episodes out?"
No shit Sherlock.
Episode 3 is out next week.
Also the Nightsisters didn't ever call it The Force either, they called it "Magick", these proto-Nightsisters call it "The Thread" which is part of his meltdown.
Did they just assume the Force wanted to be called she/her instead of it/they? Seems rather preposterous to assume, eh?
So your argument is that a Lucas produced episode 7-9 would have been as derivative as Disney's? I find that a bit hard to believe, given how wildly different his OT and PT are. Lucas seems to be a huge risk taker, which is the exact opposite of what Disney has done in recent years. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that he still could have made a much more novel and interesting trilogy revolving around similar character arcs. Nothing about him suggests to me he would have wanted to stick as close to the OT as Disney did. I believe his execution would have been sufficiently different.That was all in Lucas' version. But in his Vader Jr. was seduced to the dark side by Darth Talon from the Legacy comics. Lucas had some kind of fetish for her because he forced her into the cancelled Darth Maul game. He put a Darth Talon statue next to a Darth Maul statue in a meeting with the devs and said "Look, they're friends". None of the devs were brave enough to tell him the characters lived 1,000 years apart.
I do think it's funny that the same people who joke about "don't question, just consume" are there DAY 1 for these shows because it's literally the source of their content.
Hate-watching is a real thing and I imagine Hollywood knows this. It's why the actors revel in the negativity. The media also benefits from the easy clickbait.
It's a massive circuit. A feedback loop.
They conveniently admit to only two genders when it comes to females and pushing their agenda. All the time. Well in their case, just one.Did they just assume the Force wanted to be called she/her instead of it/they? Seems rather preposterous to assume, eh?
Thank god, I named my dog Kira. I didn't need the constant reminder of those shitty films every day.
I did it since Last Jedi.
Now I just watch the brand destroys itself.
Τo distract you from real problems.This is all on purpose, but, why?
They hired Michael Arndt to write a script based on George's Episode VII outline. JJ Abrams threw it out (the hunt for Luke element remained which is why Arndt got story credit) to remake ANH because he thought that Bad Robot would then take over Lucasfilm and he'd be in charge of everything especially the merchandise. Which would've never happened.
And Kathleen Kennedy hasn't run Star Wars for years at this point. Dave Filoni has been in charge of the franchise since before COVID when he got promoted to Chief Creative Officer.