I played Skyrim for 3 or 4 months. It was incredible. Much better than Starfield.Remember when you played Skyrim and didnt stop playing it for a year....
Why you not doing this with Starfield?
Remember when you played Skyrim and didnt stop playing it for a year....
Why you not doing this with Starfield?
I think this game was the biggest disappointment of the current generation. Hyped up as no other game before and it turned out the be complete trash. Should've expected this from Bethesda and Scummy Tod
Who in gods name can play a game like skyrim for a year? I can only assume these are like your 2 - 4 hour a week couch gamers?
"Do I have something in my teeth or are you just happy to see me?"Wow i thought that was a real pic from Govan in Glasgow for a second, had to look close to see its a game, we got that power over here on the X
IMO opinion it’s too low. Not many new IP games that I’ve enjoyed as much as starfield in the last 5 years.It's been awhile now. Who thinks the 83 Meta is right?
I didn't really like Starfield, found it boring and quit after 10 hours or so, but I think 83 is probably too low. It did what it set out to do, but that 50s and 60s era sci-fi is just not that exciting or a good genre for a video game.IMO opinion it’s too low. Not many new IP games that I’ve enjoyed as much as starfield in the last 5 years.
I disagree. They promised exploration and sense of adventure. They absolutely did not have any of that in the game.I didn't really like Starfield, found it boring and quit after 10 hours or so, but I think 83 is probably too low. It did what it set out to do, but that 50s and 60s era sci-fi is just not that exciting or a good genre for a video game.
I would say this is normal for a single player game but there were actually people saying this is the next skyrim that will be played for decades to come. Well, surprise mfers it's not. Currently Skyrim has 3 times more players than it.
Please no. We don't want that shit.Microsoft might deny it, but I am sure, a PS5 version is in active development…
Are you comparing a game without a dedicated CK?New mods on the nexus today:
Fallout 4 - 62
New Vegas - 30
Skyrim SE - 87
Starfield - ....4
It's dead.
Me neither, but I am sure Microsoft will find some people blinded by the hype who will buy it.Please no. We don't want that shit.
lol.Game of the generation.
Game of the forever.
lack of genuine exploration & 'constellation' crew being the single most dull, awful group of 2-dimensional companions in any rpg i've ever played? one incredibly soulless, endlessly repetitive snore fest. bailed after about 40 hours, & basically sleep-walked through the last dozen or so...It’s just so boring. I am the biggest Bethesda RPG fan there is and just can’t get into Starfeild. The focus on “cities” which are a total snoozefest really kills the game. I like the shooting well enough but every mission involving any sort of action takes place in the same 2-3 cookie cutter locations dropped on dozens of different boring ass planets.
It is just completely missing that cohesive one big map feel that makes their games so great.
”another box that looks the same”C'mon dude, you know the issues.
No in game map for towns/cities, the exploration is completly broken from previous Bethesda games, it's so stop start.
The variety in planets and cities/towns is so poor compared to Skyrim and Fallout.
Land on a planet/moon, same bases/camps, same enemies, variety is lacking.
In Skyrim & Fallout, you feel like your exploring a world. With Starfield, you're in a box then you jump to another box that looks the same as the last box..... wtf. From the studio that brought us Skyrim... really?
It's more Microsoft fault for the excessive hype and subsequent letdown. It was this Xbox generations TitanfallI think this game was the biggest disappointment of the current generation. Hyped up as no other game before and it turned out the be complete trash. Should've expected this from Bethesda and Scummy Tod
Since the game has a thousand different planets to explore I think the problem lies with the gamers of today. It's also popular to hate Bethesda games right now, as they are part of Xbox... Starfield is the game we will talk about 20 years from now as one that defined a generation.
IMO opinion it’s too low. Not many new IP games that I’ve enjoyed as much as starfield in the last 5 years.
Sounds like he knows what he likes.Sounds like you have a pretty low bar to reach.
The game has infinite replayability. I will finish Fallout 4 and I’m starting Skyrim again, never did any of the expansions.Who in gods name can play a game like skyrim for a year? I can only assume these are like your 2 - 4 hour a week couch gamers?
I am hoping against all hopes …”another box that looks the same”
Etc…
I’ve been to way more diverse environments than any other game they’ve made, can go from thick vegetated forrests to bright sandy deserts to black lava rocks to snow, to ice, to grass, etc.
The same box thing happens if you’re only moving within the same biome. Then things are samey.
For me it mostly lacks dungeon/outpost variety, better/fun/faster ways to traverse the planet surface, and more cities, they should add cities and villages to the procedural generation tool. More alien creatures is needed too. And official mod support!
There is so much they could do with this universe if they actually want to keep it growing. But right now almost everyone has dropped it, including modders, so they need to hit it out the park with the expansion first. I played it for 300+ hours before I put it down. Still have much left to see and I’ll be there for sure when Shattered Space comes.
Talking about it reminds me that I need to finish my space highlander run, I made a super offensive melee focused build and went through the game using only a sword. Never upgraded the space ship though and couldn’t beat the unskippable starborn ship fight near the end. Went off to get the mantis but stopped before I got it.
Yeah some people need to bash the idea out of their head that different people can’t have different taste in games.Sounds like he knows what he likes.
Different people like different things.It's incredibly boring even by Bethesda standards. I made the mistake of playing Cyberpunk Phantom Liberty before playing Starfield. Starfield feels like two decades behind in storytelling, character and quest design. I have zero faith anything good can come out of Bethesda anymore. Maybe with Microsoft having acquired them they can clean house and hire some new people at the top who aren't stuck in their ways.
My condolencesStarfield was my GOTY, played it for more than 300 hours.
While I consider Starfield as a flop, this is not a fair metric as Starfield doesn't yet have official mod tools so community still has a very limited capabilities for modding this game. But yeah, popularity of it probably won't be as high as with other gamesNew mods on the nexus today:
Fallout 4 - 62
New Vegas - 30
Skyrim SE - 87
Starfield - ....4
It's dead.
That's fair. People are and should be allowed to like whatever they like.Yeah some people need to bash the idea out of their head that different people can’t have different taste in games.
Imagine if someone who’re into pop music would say to someone who’re into metal that they have a pretty low bar if they think Dreamtheater is their favorite band.
Starfield was my GOTY, played it for more than 300 hours. Bet I spent more hours just building space ships and bases than whatever story focused linear AAA game the masses praised like it was the return of messiah only to drop and never touch again after seeing the credits.
On one playthrough I spent like 100 hours doing side stuff before I even did any main quests besides getting the first ship. I had a huge outpost with droid defences and a crew and automated cargo links delivering resources and greenhouses and animals and a mindreader chip in my head and was a sheriff and red mile legend before I had even let Sarah set her foot on my ship.
For me it’s not Skyrim in space, it’s a more condensed No Man’s Sky with great combat and roleplaying and a ship builder.
There is still so much I want them to add, some will likely arrive through the mod tools but I hope they officially keep building on it so they don’t drop it because so many are down on it now.
Thats way too much bullshit man.That's fair. People are and should be allowed to like whatever they like.
However, some things are objectively bad. Starfield is one of those things that are objectively bad: poor graphics, bugs, outdated combat, surface-level RPG elements, infinite loading screens, poor animation quality, awful after-sales support, poor performance, no 60 FPS option, and much, much more.
And it's equally okay to criticize those things that are objectively bad.
It really still amazes me that a small German team made a better Bethesda game with a total conversion mod than anything Bethesda has done in years.
It's been awhile now. Who thinks the 83 Meta is right?
I'm interested, what's that?