Calm down. This doesn't mean anything. Yet.
Konami has been a walking, festering corpse for a greater part of a decade anyway.
He could have always made a non MGS game. Kojipro is mostly independent, because of how much power he truly holds at Konami.
There was no MGR2 teaser, and if he leaves Konami, that doesn't mean he takes the IP with him. Konami still owns Kojipro and Metal Gear.
This is probably just Kojipro being rebranded, and Kojima taking a larger leadership role. Or he could leave. Or retire. Who knows.
The MGR2 teaser at Taiwan and now this?
Something fishy is going on.. <.<
I might be naive here, but I dont think he holds THAT much power at Konami.
If he did he wouldn't have been essentially forced into making MGS4 or the various PSP games, or now MGS5.
I really would like a Policenauts or Snatcher return to the current market. Telltale has nailed down the formula for making those games work on console.
A better question is whats gonna happen to silent hills?
I would love Sony to also find this magical pot of money to secure this mythical title, but logic.If I were Sony: take advantage over this bring Kojima, Del Toro, Reedus, and all the staff credited on P.T, change Silent Hills as completely new IP.
Oh, and Yamaoka.
I would love Sony to also find this magical pot of money to secure this mythical title, but logic.
Nintendo swoops in with the dosh.
Silent Hills, exclusively for the Wii U!
So which armored core games were the best and worst again? I'm interested, but for answer is only available second-hand (and not available in any of the stores nearby).
So which armored core games were the best and worst again? I'm interested, but for answer is only available second-hand (and not available in any of the stores nearby).
Silent Hills confirmed for 250k sales.Nintendo swoops in with the dosh.
Silent Hills, exclusively for the Wii U!
Nintendo swoops in with the dosh.
Silent Hills, exclusively for the Wii U!
Silent Hills confirmed for 250k sales.
I really don't like playing grapplers, so getting beat a few times helps smarten up and not go nuts. I gotta pick and choose when to go nuts.*Shrugs* It works on Shack til he learns his weapons against it. And if he's a scrub, there's no hope for any of us.
If you wanna win in the beginning of a fighting games release. Then pick the grappler because people don't know how to respect the grab. Zangief is just a wall with good buttons that you can't rush down. Don't worry about your connection because street fighter 5's net code will be godlike.I wish I could get better internet so I wouldn't have to hear his lag johns every time I win.
Anyways, on point. What I'm thinking, is a grapple does as much damage as a decent combo, and in some ways grapples are more versatile than combos. I guess I've always found that greatly offsets the movement limitations.
Especially in the early game. So, I usually feel overpowered right off the bat with a grappler.
I just watched the Hawken/Titanfall video and I have to say, Woolie sucks the smart pistol's dick pretty hard. I only played the Beta but the Smart pistol always seemed like it was a chump weapon for chumps.
yes, he does.I just watched the Hawken/Titanfall video and I have to say, Woolie sucks the smart pistol's dick pretty hard. I only played the Beta but the Smart pistol always seemed like it was a chump weapon for chumps.
It's still a chump weapon.Maybe the Smart Pistol has been nerfed from when you last remember?
I just watched the Hawken/Titanfall video and I have to say, Woolie sucks the smart pistol's dick pretty hard. I only played the Beta but the Smart pistol always seemed like it was a chump weapon for chumps.
Hah! My friend used smart pistol and killed like 75 minions in one round, there's an ability that'll make the lock-on much harder IIRC.
WHAT!? You saved me with that information. All right, for answer is not an option then. Thank you.
I just watched the Hawken/Titanfall video and I have to say, Woolie sucks the smart pistol's dick pretty hard. I only played the Beta but the Smart pistol always seemed like it was a chump weapon for chumps.
I was getting about 100 minion kills per round without it IIRC
I may have just been an idiot and it may actually be there but I'm not 100% sure, I rember getting 4 & for answer on the same day and it was definately in 4 but no visible option in answer
It has garbo range so it's pretty useless, there's an attachment that speeds up lockon time IIRC, but yeah it's not as good as Woolz was making it out to be, no one uses it in super top tier play, that's what the super OP CAR SMG is for
I may have just been an idiot and it may actually be there but I'm not 100% sure, I rember getting 4 & for answer on the same day and it was definately in 4 but no visible option in answer
Minions are still the AI bots that aren't worth shit. Killing a lot of them is useful to the team but no big accomplishment.To be fair, it was the first day he played Titanfall.
Yeah when I played it I don't recall being killed by Smart Pistols very often. If I ever was I didn't even get mad about it I just got disappointed in the player
Its a starting weapon too so as soon as you can create a class it's avalible, also all three shots have to hit to get a player kill unless you aim it yourself and get the headshot, it's a cool idea but yeah it's pretty useless when you unlock better stuff, or when you pull your head out of your ass and learn to shoot things proper
Basically it's the babbys first FPS gun
I want to play TitanFall now :L, I really liked the Beta but I could hardly justify buying the full game for a multiplayer only shooter. Here is hoping that titanfall 2 has at least a singleplayer mode.
I want to play TitanFall now :L, I really liked the Beta but I could hardly justify buying the full game for a multiplayer only shooter. Here is hoping that titanfall 2 has at least a singleplayer mode.
They're probably gonna make one, and it's gonna be 2 hours long and Battlefield-tier campaign quality.
Which is to say I hold no confidence in it actually being good.
There's no way for it to have a truly satisfying singleplayer, I'd rather a more fleshed out Multiplayer at that point.
Call of Duty 4 was the last real shooter to leave me feeling content after playing the singleplayer campaign.
There's no way for it to have a truly satisfying singleplayer, I'd rather a more fleshed out Multiplayer at that point.
Call of Duty 4 was the last real shooter to leave me feeling content after playing the singleplayer campaign.
CoD4 was probably the best singleplayer FPS but I had a lot of fun with the Bad Company single player modes. Wolfenstein is supposed to be great but I haven't played that yet.
Sure but I'm never going to spend £40 on a multiplayer only game. It either needs to be cheaper or have more singleplayer content.
The opposite for me. Multiplayer is nearly everything to me in a shooter.
Sure but I'm never going to spend £40 on a multiplayer only game. It either needs to be cheaper or have more singleplayer content.
So you're saying you can justify the money even if the singleplayer is average and not actually worthwhile, just as long as it "exists"?
Man this entire discussion is fucked.
Quick question: how robust would a multiplayer-only game have to be in order for it to be worth the $60/40 pounds? For some people, I don't think there's EVER a satisfactory answer to that question...
The opposite for me. Multiplayer is nearly everything to me in a shooter.
If they were to make another Titanfall I'd rather they not waste time and effort making a shallow singleplayer campaign and just have them focus on the multiplayer.
I never played Bad Company 1, but Bad Company 2's singleplayer was fun. The squad interactions were pretty funny.
Man this entire discussion is fucked.
Quick question: how robust would a multiplayer-only game have to be in order for it to be worth the $60/40 pounds? For some people, I don't think there's EVER a satisfactory answer to that question...
If it keeps players playing, that's all that matters for me. I just want people to play with.Man this entire discussion is fucked.
Quick question: how robust would a multiplayer-only game have to be in order for it to be worth the $60/40 pounds? For some people, I don't think there's EVER a satisfactory answer to that question...
This is how I feel as well. It is unfortunate for people who like the single player compaignes but publishers know that isn't where the money is and I would rather have a pure multiplayer experience then a game with a tacked on singleplayer
The Bad Company games were pretty great. I prefer them over the mainline games for sure.
The simple solution to this would be to add an offline multiplayer mode against bots.
The simple solution to this would be to add an offline multiplayer mode against bots.
Yup. I must have spent 100 hours or more on BC2's multiplayer. So good. Too bad they couldn't replicate it with the newer Battlefield games.