I really want to hear what the long term plan, in the form of a plan.
Greens all the way, baby.
Caroline Lucas is a model MP and Natalie Bennett is a fellow Australian dual-citizen so she's cool by me.
And they actually give a shit about equality too.
You are talking about the short term. Yes, in the short term everyone is worse off.
That's not what the UK had - the UK had all that and additional controls from the EU / agreements it wanted out of. Ie, the proverbial free movement (of people).
I can only say general words which I am sure will be met with 'it's too general' and 'woah, good luck'. The gist is that the EU is inefficient and the UK can be more efficient without it.
And lost growth just now requires far greater growth in future years to catch up, if you lose 1% just now you actually need greater than 2% just to keep up to where you would be.
We had the lowest growth rates in the G7 pre-accession to the EU and that was when we actually made and exported shit.
I have no problem with you saying that, heck I'm able to perfectly articulate the benefits of the EU myself. But I, or other people, can share links or comments of why it would be better, not anecdotes.
It's too early to tell if Leave was a great idea or not, but it seems to be the vote of the heart.
You are talking about the short term. Yes, in the short term everyone is worse off.
Clown, May will squash this fool.
![]()
Please don't spread the misconception that anybody in Labour opposed to Corbyn is a Blairite.
I don't know if this is a tragic-bad thing but earlier when people were suggesting Labour split into a new Democratic party i was thinking "Hmm...Liberal Democrats?" only to THEN realize the name was taken >_>
I shared some links and comments up the thread, although not a lot, because (a) there has been a constant flurry of news, and (b) we all are in a shock to a degree and so right now there's a lot of talk and emotion, while numbers hopefully will come into power later.
I genuinely believe that the UK is better off out of the EU, it's not a vote of heart in my case, although I obviously can't say for others.
What? Lots of the people opposing Corbyn are Blairites. It has spread beyond them now but when Corbyn first got elected Blairites were definitely sniping and refusing to support him as leader(maybe there were non-Blairites at the time too). This was a tactical error since they weren't just undermining him they were undermining the credibility of the party. Even if they depose him now the damage to the party has already been done.
I just don't even know what Labour(More specifically Corbyn) are playing at.
He wasn't going to stand a chance of getting in anyway, between his total lack of MP support, and the fact his lefty views aren't a massive hit everywhere. Now he decides to also go after the same 52% that the Tories are going after? It's madness. I mean I get he was always wanting to leave the UK, but is he really that delusional he can best the Tories with Labour in its current state?
I wonder if young people never heard of the Lib Dems and just remember the name Nick Clegg and THE GOVERNMENT.
I've been thinking, all they need to do is figure out a way to make universities free/wipe off student finance debt, and then they can save us from ourselves.
If I was SUPER rich this is what I'd be working with them on. We need them in power.
Of corse he'd say that, he smells London's blood in the waterNot seen this posted yet.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...e-cancelled-or-delayed-says-francois-hollande
That's unfair, he did an excellent job of uniting teachers.
Against him.
I'm not that young
However i understand your point...and it seems somewhat believable
My Mum has been a Lib Dem voter for years (Chris Grayling's been our MP for 15 years or so though so boo) so i've been aware of them and have voted Lab or Lib Dem in any relevant elections in my area since i've been able...
If i was filthy rich i'd work out how little i need to live in a nice house/pay the bills etc then team up with Lib Dems or form a Superparty and work towards reducing and eliminating tuition fees...or something similarly pipe-dreamy. I feel like education should be free, and not to diminish the quality of teaching but the opportunity to go to a good school or study at university should not be denied to anyone because of a financial barrier.
If Gove gets in, I fully expect a Glorious Revolution where we invite some European head of state to invade us because our official leader is a useless piece of shit.
Germany probably wouldn't be up for it, but I reckon we could persuade the French. Spain seems to have a few too many political parties at the moment, so maybe we could borrow one (preferably not that awfully corrupt one).
Is this a strange world in which Labour focus more on businesses and Tories talk abut wealth inequalities or is my impression skewed?
Seriously...what the hell are they playing at...?been a life-long Labour voter, I ca not stand by those policies.
its the Lib Dems or Greens for me
From what I understand Labour MP want to shift more towards the right because they want to win elections.
Corbyn is die-hard lefty, not compromising.
Labour going more right, wouldn't that make them Tories essentially?
From what I understand Labour MP want to shift more towards the right because they want to win elections.
Corbyn is die-hard lefty, not compromising.
Labour going more right, wouldn't that make them Tories essentially?
Question - if both parties feel like they MUST do something about immigration because the electorate demands it, isn't the easier solution to look at measures to reduce non-EU immigration? I'm basing that on the fact that it accounts for a larger proportion of immigrants than those within the EU and whilst not consequence-free, might give us a means to avoid the Brexit shitstorm? It's a possible way or saying that we didn't follow the vote, we followed the route cause of it? I think the whole thing is a nonsense either way, but just a thought.
Question - if both parties feel like they MUST do something about immigration because the electorate demands it, isn't the easier solution to look at measures to reduce non-EU immigration? I'm basing that on the fact that it accounts for a larger proportion of immigrants than those within the EU and whilst not consequence-free, might give us a means to avoid the Brexit shitstorm? It's a possible way or saying that we didn't follow the vote, we followed the route cause of it? I think the whole thing is a nonsense either way, but just a thought.
Question - if both parties feel like they MUST do something about immigration because the electorate demands it, isn't the easier solution to look at measures to reduce non-EU immigration? I'm basing that on the fact that it accounts for a larger proportion of immigrants than those within the EU and whilst not consequence-free, might give us a means to avoid the Brexit shitstorm? It's a possible way or saying that we didn't follow the vote, we followed the route cause of it? I think the whole thing is a nonsense either way, but just a thought.
Watching that gove speech, something is up. Nobody could seriously expect this man to win.
Question - if both parties feel like they MUST do something about immigration because the electorate demands it, isn't the easier solution to look at measures to reduce non-EU immigration? I'm basing that on the fact that it accounts for a larger proportion of immigrants than those within the EU and whilst not consequence-free, might give us a means to avoid the Brexit shitstorm? It's a possible way or saying that we didn't follow the vote, we followed the route cause of it? I think the whole thing is a nonsense either way, but just a thought.
Finnish minister of foreign affairs Timo Soini is getting fucking roasted by the rest of the parliament today.
He went to see UK about this whole Brexit thing, and he's the head of True Finn's Party (similar to say, UKIP), and he's been heard talking about how there "loud discussion" about EU membership here while in actuality it's pretty clear we're pro-EU (according to study few days ago, at least 70% support EU membership).
To give you a better image, imagine if instead of UK, another big country was leaving EU, and UK was very pro-EU but their Foreign Secretary was Nigel Farage, and he's been voicing his very personal opinions abroad as fact
just heard my mother say
"I want my country back"
I am so fucking done
just heard my mother say
"I want my country back"
I am so fucking done
Question - if both parties feel like they MUST do something about immigration because the electorate demands it, isn't the easier solution to look at measures to reduce non-EU immigration? I'm basing that on the fact that it accounts for a larger proportion of immigrants than those within the EU and whilst not consequence-free, might give us a means to avoid the Brexit shitstorm? It's a possible way or saying that we didn't follow the vote, we followed the route cause of it? I think the whole thing is a nonsense either way, but just a thought.
Non-EU immigrants are required for Britain to function. Most of those non-EU migrants are either students which provide huge sums of money for our universities, health workers who fill roles in the NHS and international business people who bring investment and jobs
Just for perspective a 1% drop per year in GDP equals £18 billion. At even a conservative 35% taxed rate this is £6 billion per year of lost money to the exchequer.
Now that Gove has admitted that he can only give £100m in savings per week ( which remain said was closer to our cost of membership) to the NHS, this means that any drop of more than 1% of GDP caused by leaving the biggest market in the world will have wiped out all the savings in one go.
Well done lads, well done.
I wonder why they would try to bring in nurses from outside of Europe when it was easier to get them in eastern europe.Non-EU immigrants are required for Britain to function. Most of those non-EU migrants are either students which provide huge sums of money for our universities, health workers who fill roles in the NHS and international business people who bring investment and jobs
I'm not 100% sure,but I think it allows for a more thorough check of competence.I wonder why they would try to bring in nurses from outside of Europe when it was easier to get them in eastern europe.
been a life-long Labour voter, I can not stand by those policies.
its the Lib Dems or Greens for me
And the only way to function without that is better education for the general population ~~ which isn't going to happen with the spending cuts.
Cameron should say he's canceling his departure, call immediately for elections, says the Tories will run for a remain mandate and anyone in his party who wants the UK to exit to leave the party. He would win. UKIP would get some votes, but the conservatives would win because they'd get all the remain votes + those that regret voting leave + a bunch of labour votes since that party is in shambles.
Boris is out, Labour is out, all people would have left is to vote for UKIP, and they wouldn't win, and the UK could throw this whole Brexit thing in the trash since Cameron could say he won the mandate to stay, which clearly supplants the non-binding poll-referendum, and run his campaign on how the leave campaigners had lie and how the proof is that when they won their leading chearleader quit because he never wanted it to win anyway and that it was just a power grab.
The citizen's initiative started by BB Sebastian has already been signed by over 25000 people!
What? Lots of the people opposing Corbyn are Blairites.