Can you please explain what you mean by the above statement?
They run their business more cautiously than an entertainment company should. They run it like they have a particular commodity - games. As long as they have a specific set of games with a specific number of sales, then they're good and their business model tends to reflect the same type of performance that one would expect from a utility company or maybe landline telephone companies.
The hardware, as unique as it often seems, is made for economic reasons and the ability to play the games as they are in Nintendo's head at the time without a care in the world for others. This too is not that big of a deal except that they routinely make it sound like they want 3rd party involvement when they really don't, or at least not so much that they will change their original plans by much.
I hope & pray WiiU is different & 3rd parties are head over heels in love with the thing, but I'm not that concerned about 3rd Party as it's 1st Party I buy Nintendo for. This is why I say I wish Nintendo would just focus on dominating everybody if they don't focus on embracing most. That said, it never hurts to be on par with your competitors and/or if your software competitors abandon you, you have to be prepared to produce across most/all genres and on a regular basis.
Otherwise your business strategy sucks and a company relies on its own hubris or new stuff that doesn't connect with the regular buyers (Aka hardcore or people who think they're hardcore).
I'm rambling so I'll say more if it's warranted.