Washington Post calls GameCube "obsolete", recommends PS2/Xbox for Holiday gifts...

Redbeard said:
And if someone isn't interested in quirky Nintendo games? What will the Gamecube have to offer such an individual aside from Zelda?

Well those weren't the conditions of his post, were they? No reason to get all defensive.
 
Does anyone have a perception on what casual gamers want? It's not like everyone looks 8 months into the future and see's 40 games and starts downloading video's for them.
The gamecube has, Madden-check, need for speed- check, tony hawk- check, Fifa=check, bond games- check. You see where im heading. You can't realisticly say it's not worth it for a 15 yr old kid to get a gamecube with Tony hawk underground, need for speed and the sims, when likely thatys what he woulda got on the ps2.
How many people do you know that buy more than 5-6 games a year, people on this forum are the minorit.
*PS* i only red first 3 pages mainly.
 
MrparisSM said:
Ummm, what about KOTOR II?? Forza?? Unreal Championship 2?? Doom 3?? That Mech Wolf game?? Splinter Cell Chaos Theory??? Those plus the ones you mentioned are PLENTY for anybody.

KOTOR II - I'm buying the PC version.
Forza - Let's be real, it's no Gran Turismo.
Unreal Championship 2 - Unreal in 3rd person? No thanks. I'll stick with UT2004.
Doom 3 - An average game at best. At least the PC version has impressive graphics.
Mech Wolf - never heard of it, can't comment
SCPT - Also available for the PC, PS2, and GC plus the PC version will probably be $30 or less a month after it's released.

None of those games are really worth buying a new system over IMO.
 
"I think he meant besides racers and online games. And shooters too I guess."

And Sports games. Oh wait. We have just eliminated 80% of the market. And in that 20% are die hard RPG fans. Jade Empire. Ever heard of it?

"None of those games are really worth buying a new system over IMO."

That's why Halo 2 is on the system. That's the seller. You're just listing the icing on the cake, as is the case with nearly every consoles lineup in history. The thing is if things happen as rumored then the Xbox will also get MGS3 and GTA:SA next year as well. Not only will it have the best looking 3rd party titles, it will also have a very attractive lineup of games for anyone wanting to buy a console. You're talking about selling this console to someone when these games are already out. You can make a top 10 Xbox list in the middle of 2005 that's as good as the PS2. That's saying a lot for the console market.
 
MrparisSM said:
Ummm, what about KOTOR II?? Forza?? Unreal Championship 2?? Doom 3?? That Mech Wolf game?? Splinter Cell Chaos Theory??? Those plus the ones you mentioned are PLENTY for anybody.
KotOR II comes out Tues. :D

Chaos Theory will be as exclusive as RE4.

GCN owners aren't interested in the other games you mentioned. As they aren't Iron Phoenix, SW: Republic Commando, and Advent Rising which could be great too.

Monkey Ball DX, Dragon Ball Z Sagas, King of Fighters 02/03, Wrestlmania XXI, and Winning Eleven are also listed on EB for next year though.
 
AniHawk said:
Well those weren't the conditions of his post, were they? No reason to get all defensive.

That sounded defensive? I was just trying to show the absurdity of his statement; if you exclude the area/s in which a certain console excels, then yes, the list of "interesting exclusives" dwindles down.
 
CrimsonSkies said:
"I think he meant besides racers and online games. And shooters too I guess."

And Sports games. Oh wait. We have just eliminated 80% of the market. And in that 20% are die hard RPG fans. Jade Empire. Ever heard of it?

He never said sports (those are actually on the GC :lol). Online isn't too big (yet, but it's growing fast).

Shooters and realistic racers (if that encompasses arcade, sim, offroad, snowboarding, and Waverace type games, I don't know. Probably though) are a pretty big part of the industry though.

Redbeard said:
That sounded defensive? I was just trying to show the absurdity of his statement; if you exclude the area/s in which a certain console excels, then yes, the list of "interesting exclusives" dwindles down.

Well it did, but thanks for clarifying, and I'm sorry for the misunderstanding. It just sounded like an "OH YEAH!? WELL..." type of post to me.
 
Subitai said:
No.

"Originally Posted by ManaByte:
EB Games upcoming GCN releases: 27
EB Games upcoming Xbox releases: 76
EB Games upcoming PS2 releases: 93 "

Going by casual interests and tastes, XBX is a better deal for the upcoming year. Even going by snob tastes in here, saying half the PS2 and XBX games are trash and every GCN is at least decent, that's still more games for XBX and almost double for PS2.


Man, this is setting GCN up for something really insulting if XBX sells more this time next year than GCN after the Xenon launch. It's like when PSOne was almost selling more in 02.
Last January some punk used EBGames list as proof only twentysomething games were to be released throughout 2004 for the GameCube. GAF had a thread in the hundreds about that list.

Look at the games in EB's database and it just becomes a joke. Kameo is coming out January 3rd on Xbox! Acclaim are publishing Worms 3D for Xbox on January 11th!

I don't have the time to pick out later examples but there are suspiciously a lot of stuck in development hell games like Fast and the Furious that have been put in early 2005 just because EB has nowhere else to put 'em. On the flipside THQ and Activision have announced most of their 2005 line-ups for GameCube neither the second or third biggest third party publishers have a game listed in EB's database.

Those statistics are worthless.
 
APerfectCircle said:
Does anyone have a perception on what casual gamers want? It's not like everyone looks 8 months into the future and see's 40 games and starts downloading video's for them.
The gamecube has, Madden-check, need for speed- check, tony hawk- check, Fifa=check, bond games- check. You see where im heading. You can't realisticly say it's not worth it for a 15 yr old kid to get a gamecube with Tony hawk underground, need for speed and the sims, when likely thatys what he woulda got on the ps2.
How many people do you know that buy more than 5-6 games a year, people on this forum are the minorit.
*PS* i only red first 3 pages mainly.
Casuals want GTA: SA. The latest Dragon Ball and Smackdown help too.

The other stuff in demand is good too, but the problem is more selection they see than what is really available. I said in another post GCN has the smallest shelf space by a significant margin at most retailers. That's where they're losing people. Not having a game like Halo 2 this holiday hurts too.
 
"He never said sports (those are actually on the GC ). Online isn't too big (yet, but it's growing fast)."

Captain AniObviousHawk strikes again! I filled in the blank there as sports are also strong on the console.
 
For people who are saying their favourite piece of hardware is not obsolete, they are spending a lot of time trolling other pieces of hardware and not playing games.
 
CrimsonSkies said:
"He never said sports (those are actually on the GC ). Online isn't too big (yet, but it's growing fast)."

Captain AniObviousHawk strikes again! I filled in the blank there as sports are also strong on the console.

Oh, I see. It was just you putting words into his mouth. I gotcha now.
 
cja said:
Last January some punk used EBGames list as proof only twentysomething games were to be released throughout 2004 for the GameCube. GAF had a thread in the hundreds about that list.

Look at the games in EB's database and it just becomes a joke. Kameo is coming out January 3rd on Xbox! Acclaim are publishing Worms 3D for Xbox on January 11th!

I don't have the time to pick out later examples but there are suspiciously a lot of stuck in development hell games like Fast and the Furious that have been put in early 2005 just because EB has nowhere else to put 'em. On the flipside THQ and Activision have announced most of their 2005 line-ups for GameCube neither the second or third biggest third party publishers have a game listed in EB's database.

Those statistics are worthless.
It's not just EB. That was just a quick dirty example.

Casuals care about what they can get, and I keep saying MS has done a much better job at keeping close to Sony's releases than Nintendo. The result is most retailers have more space for XBX games. XBX has released ~150 more games in the US than GCN. Crap or not, it's made XBX and alternative to PS2 for casuals who do pick up or like the possibility of picking up "trash" like Wheel of Fortune, Risk, Barbie Horse Adventure, The Guy Game, and Chessmaster.


Back to your main point. For the ambivilent readers looking for gift advice. XBX isn't a bad deal for their tastes, and is better over the next year than GCN. If MS keeps mildly supporting XBX and the EA/Activision/THQ ports keep coming casuals might still be going for XBX in 2 years.
 
I'm a multi-console owner and own all three systems, though I've always been a huge Nintendo fan and I still am.

Regardless, when my two best friends told me they were buying systems (this was probably two years ago) and I asked them which, they said GC. Now these guys are casual as casual could be. I told them, despite my love for N-games, that they would probably be better served with PS2 or Xbox, but they wouldn't listen. "I always liked Nintendo games best", they said. Okay, I can't argue with that, so I didn't try to stop them. Now they are selling their cubes and buying Xboxes and PS2s. The lack of big name 3rd party games and deficiencies in certain genres has killed the Cube. These two guys don't give a crap about the color of the console or what the disc capacity is or any of that crap. They just want certain games and they aren't getting them.

Nintendo again dropped the ball and there's no denying it. The reasons are numerous and would fill several posts, so we won't get into that. The point is that that's two in a row and it's going to be a cold day in hell before any casual plops down 200-300 for a Nintendo system again. Two years ago I hated it when people suggested that Nintendo go the Sega third party route for console games, now I think that it's the absolute best thing that N could do. They need to make games, that's what they're good at, and maybe release their own controllers for each console (I love the cube controller, dislike the DS2, but that's me). Concentrate on hand-held hardware and leave the console hardware to somebody else.

The only thing that puzzles me is this. I know why Cube-owners rush to the N's defense, but why do cube-haters exist? Why do they care what happens to the console that they don't own? If so few games are coming out and it's "all over" then why all the attacks? I can think of two reasons:

1) Some folks are just mean and enjoy heaping suffering and torment on others

2) Many haters *wish* that they could play certain Nintendo-exclusive games but refuse to be bothered with the expense or trouble of a second or third console. The quicker Nintendo gives up, the quicker they get their wish. Perfectly logical.
 
ohwell1.jpg


I don't know why I put a Vodafone sticker on it
 
SolidSnakex said:
"While others are talking, Nintendo is acting. Let me ask you a question: what company right now is driving category sales? If you said someone other than Nintendo, you're wrong. We have momentum -- have had it since late last year, and if you don't feel it yet, you will. I promise you that." Reggie

Momentum can go downwards too.
 
I don't see why anyone would sell their consoles this late in the game.. you just don't get any money for it.

I disagree. You can get $60 for a working cube and one controller at GameRush\Blockbuster. That's a damn fine deal for a used $100 system. IMO, of course.
 
This thread is seriously lacking in the crying children pics department.

Jk, I do fell bad for my ex-fellow Nbots.
 
I encourage all who are upset and discouraged by this WP piece to take the time to drop an email, make a phone call, or write a letter:


The Washington Post
1150 15th Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20071

703-469-2500
webnews@washingtonpost.com


With any luck, our concerns about this reckless attitude towards Nintendo and Nintendo fans will persuade the Washington Post to issue a retraction.

Happy hunting. :)
 
Gahiggidy said:
I encourage all who are upset and discouraged by this WP piece to take the time to drop an email, make a phone call, or write a letter:


The Washington Post
1150 15th Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20071

703-469-2500
webnews@washingtonpost.com


With any luck, our concerns about this reckless attitude towards Nintendo and Nintendo fans will persuade the Washington Post to issue a retraction.

Happy hunting. :)

Don't you dare.

edit: Oh, I thought you posted his personal info. So sorry. Go ahead and be as obnoxious as you want, it only makes you look like bigger ner-- I mean, more passionate hobbyists.!
 
Cube haters exist because it's easy and fun to kick someone while they are down... duh.
 
While the Gamecube is a terrible choice for a first console, I'd say it's arguably the best choice as a companion console. There are still pleanty of reasons to own one.
 
The thing is if things happen as rumored then the Xbox will also get MGS3 and GTA:SA next year as well.

Rumored by whom? It's rumored that Halo 2 will come to the PS2 in superior form. It's also rumored that Bungie is jumping ship, joining Nintendo as a 1st party. It goes both ways. There have been ZERO rumblings to lead anyone to believe MGS3 is headed to the Xbox. Given the eventual ports of GTA3 and GTA:VC, I think it's a foregone conclusion that GTA:SA will head to the Xbox -- though, likely not until next winter. Right now, however, only the PC version has been mentioned -- and that is said to arrive at the end of the summer.

You can make a top 10 Xbox list in the middle of 2005 that's as good as the PS2

Subjectively, you can. However you cannot in any quantifiable and qualitative sense make such an absurd statement.
 
cja said:
Last January some punk used EBGames list as proof only twentysomething games were to be released throughout 2004 for the GameCube. GAF had a thread in the hundreds about that list.

Look at the games in EB's database and it just becomes a joke. Kameo is coming out January 3rd on Xbox! Acclaim are publishing Worms 3D for Xbox on January 11th!

I don't have the time to pick out later examples but there are suspiciously a lot of stuck in development hell games like Fast and the Furious that have been put in early 2005 just because EB has nowhere else to put 'em. On the flipside THQ and Activision have announced most of their 2005 line-ups for GameCube neither the second or third biggest third party publishers have a game listed in EB's database.

Those statistics are worthless.

Hey, i think that punk was me. Its funny, because to me its a legit fact, the gc has less titles coming out when compared to ps2 and xbox. The ratio of cube to xbox and ps2 titles has been consistently been getting worse as each year passes. To me it showed the same mistake nintendo made last generation with n64, lack of 3rd party support. The ratio this year only backs up the trends I noticed last year.

I never claimed the list was perfect, or the dates would be correct, or all these titles will definately be released. But I think its a good guideline about future prospects that will most likely be released at some point, and the percentage of titles that will be delayed or canceled on the lists is probably close to the same on all systems. I think the ps2 has double the amount of games the GC has now, and the xbox has more than 200 games. I dont know if its greed or bad develper relationships, but this is the biggest reason that nintendo has lost all its market share imo. Sorry that info upset you, but I think it was relevant info.
 
Xbox has been agressive in the last few months. They've been selling at a similar level to PS2.

Which is why he probably said "equal", because their sure aint a console thats come close to PS2 in a long while (handhelds dont count, different market)

Good to see positive Xbox press, finally turning heads
 
Kobun Heat said:
An anagram of "Washington Post" is "Town gasp: no shit!"

Thank you.

is there a website where you can do that? Do anagrams? That's pretty cool. I never understood how some people can do anagrams off the top of their heads. I was watching this show and they had people who could look at a phrase and come up with anagrams. SHOCK AND AWE.


I hope you guys realise my momentum comment was meant to be ironic.
 
XS+ said:
Subjectively, you can. However you cannot in any quantifiable and qualitative sense make such an absurd statement.

Of course a top ten list is going to be completely subjective. How is his opinion an absurd statement?
 
briefcasemanx said:
Of course a top ten list is going to be completely subjective. How is his opinion an absurd statement?

Because if one were to take the ten highest rated titles in 2004, from the respective systems, the PS2 would be at the top. It saw the most AAA (according to rating) titles this year. Is it because the PS2 has more support? Probably, but that doesn't subtract from the falsity of painting the PS2 and Xbox as equals.
 
The Cube has had a great year. The only thing I would have liked is a sequel to Animal Crossing, which is apparently coming to the DS now. :(
 
XS+ said:
Because if one were to take the ten highest rated titles in 2004, from the respective systems, the PS2 would be at the top. It saw the most AAA (according to rating) titles this year. Is it because the PS2 has more support? Probably, but that doesn't subtract from the falsity of painting the PS2 and Xbox as equals.

Rated by whom? Is everyone now supposed to go to gamerankings.com to form their opinions? IMO (if i'm still allowed to have one), it is not that far off base. I would say if you took the top 8 than that would be a more accurate statement FOR ME.

As far as ratings, if that's what you want, xbox has 5 AAA titles (>or= 90%) in 2004 according to gamerankings. PS2 has 6, GC has 2.
 
XS+ said:
Because if one were to take the ten highest rated titles in 2004, from the respective systems, the PS2 would be at the top. It saw the most AAA (according to rating) titles this year. Is it because the PS2 has more support? Probably, but that doesn't subtract from the falsity of painting the PS2 and Xbox as equals.

Could you please provide factual support to your statement instead of pulling things out your ass? I've shown you how many titles were AAA according to IGN, where's your list? Might we use Gamerankings? I'm sure you'll be surprised by the outcome.
 
Subitai said:
Back to your main point. For the ambivilent readers looking for gift advice. XBX isn't a bad deal for their tastes, and is better over the next year than GCN. If MS keeps mildly supporting XBX and the EA/Activision/THQ ports keep coming casuals might still be going for XBX in 2 years.
I almost replied to this with a list! :p Nintendo are supporting the GC with software for the next year, maybe two. Microsoft are supporting for the next three months, maybe a year. Microsoft have three confirmed Xbox games they're publishing from 2005 onwards; Nintendo of America have six games with another half-a-dozen announced by NCL which are likely to get released in the west. One console costs 50% more than the other. EA/Activision/THQ are irrelevant, they're largely supporting both. Third party exclusives are almost non-existant on either, Oddworld versus RE4, no contest. I don't see how the Xbox is a no.1 choice out of the three unless your favourite genre is shooters or you have to be online for multiplayer action.

For gift advice I'd say give what the receiver wants, and that probably will be Xbox over the GameCube. Doesn't necessarily make it the most entertaining or value purchase though.

Flatbread said:
Hey, i think that punk was me. Its funny, because to me its a legit fact, the gc has less titles coming out when compared to ps2 and xbox. The ratio of cube to xbox and ps2 titles has been consistently been getting worse as each year passes. To me it showed the same mistake nintendo made last generation with n64, lack of 3rd party support. The ratio this year only backs up the trends I noticed last year.

I never claimed the list was perfect, or the dates would be correct, or all these titles will definately be released. But I think its a good guideline about future prospects that will most likely be released at some point, and the percentage of titles that will be delayed or canceled on the lists is probably close to the same on all systems. I think the ps2 has double the amount of games the GC has now, and the xbox has more than 200 games. I dont know if its greed or bad develper relationships, but this is the biggest reason that nintendo has lost all its market share imo. Sorry that info upset you, but I think it was relevant info.
A legit fact that GC has fewer games, yes, I don't see anyone disputing that. But neither Manabyte's numbers nor yours were used for this purpose, even if they were intended as such. The lists are/were used to say the GameCube had only three more months of games left, that it is "obsolete".

I'd argue that the lists fundamentally skew and exaggerate the difference. You have the first quarter releases, okay, but from April, the next financial year, forward most big, publicly listed, game publishers have yet to reveal their release information. There are a glut of games planned for the previous year that get dropped back and these are usually from the smaller, less organised, publishers who either have bad planning or don't strictly adhere to release dates whatever the quality of product. Unlike bigger publishers who get games out on time.

Imho GameCube hasn't lost marketshare due to lack of support. EA/THQ/Activision have 49% of the entire PS2 market all three support GC with almost their entire PS2 line-up. GameCube has lost marketshare simply because it isn't seen as a cool console. Why else would people buy virtually the same EA games on PS2 or Xbox in far greater numbers than on a far cheaper alternative?
 
As i keep saying to people. Go to ebgames.com goto ps2... go to show complete list for upcoming games... goto xbox... do the same thing... go to gamecube...

PS2 has 9 pages of upcoming titles
Xbox has 7 pages
GameCube has 3
 
cja said:
A legit fact that GC has fewer games, yes, I don't see anyone disputing that. But neither Manabyte's numbers nor yours were used for this purpose, even if they were intended as such. The lists are/were used to say the GameCube had only three more months of games left, that it is "obsolete".

I'd argue that the lists fundamentally skew and exaggerate the difference. You have the first quarter releases, okay, but from April, the next financial year, forward most big, publicly listed, game publishers have yet to reveal their release information. There are a glut of games planned for the previous year that get dropped back and these are usually from the smaller, less organised, publishers who either have bad planning or don't strictly adhere to release dates whatever the quality of product. Unlike bigger publishers who get games out on time.

Imho GameCube hasn't lost marketshare due to lack of support. EA/THQ/Activision have 49% of the entire PS2 market all three support GC with almost their entire PS2 line-up. GameCube has lost marketshare simply because it isn't seen as a cool console. Why else would people buy virtually the same EA games on PS2 or Xbox in far greater numbers than on a far cheaper alternative?


well truth be told there is more than one factor contributing to nintys gc failures, but I really dont think its "not cool" is a big factor at all, what is a bigger factor right now though is the xbox is the new in thing with halo 2, and the ps2 is just continuing its unrivaled popularity, leaving nintendo in the unfortunate category of third wheel.

I think your underestimating the importance of 3rd party support, its lack of sports titles and shooter action titles has hurt it badly. If you look at sales 3rd party games sell horribly on gc, much worse than its user base market share.

that said I have been thinking of getting a GC, i only own an xbox and have played lots and lots of games but would like to play metroid prime 1 & 2, zelda, mario sunshine, pikmen 1 and 2 and viewtiful joe, plus whatever else might be worthwhile.
 
TheGreenGiant said:
is there a website where you can do that? Do anagrams? That's pretty cool. I never understood how some people can do anagrams off the top of their heads. I was watching this show and they had people who could look at a phrase and come up with anagrams. SHOCK AND AWE.
http://www.wordsmith.org/anagram/ , though I'm sure there are others.

XS+ said:
Because if one were to take the ten highest rated titles in 2004, from the respective systems, the PS2 would be at the top. It saw the most AAA (according to rating) titles this year.
But noone can even agree what AAA means. For instance, I wouldn't say AAA is greater than 90%. Does that make a 97% an AAAAAAA?
 
DopeyFish said:
As i keep saying to people. Go to ebgames.com goto ps2... go to show complete list for upcoming games... goto xbox... do the same thing... go to gamecube...

PS2 has 9 pages of upcoming titles
Xbox has 7 pages
GameCube has 3


So? More doesn't necessarily mean better. How many of these listing is for hardware and strategy guides and such nonsense.

I'm sure when E3 rolls around, all three systems will see a nice big list of upcoming titles.

For myself, as it currently stands, the Cube has the most titles I plan on buying next year. Donkey Kong Jungle Beat, StarFox Assault, Fire Emblem, and Zelda Next. The PS2 follows closely behind with Wanda and Dragon Quest 8 if it makes it here next year. For the Xbox, only Jade Empire. After Halo 2 and KOTOR 2, can you really blame me? :)
 
Gahiggidy said:
I encourage all who are upset and discouraged by this WP piece to take the time to drop an email, make a phone call, or write a letter:


The Washington Post
1150 15th Street Northwest
Washington, DC 20071

703-469-2500
webnews@washingtonpost.com


With any luck, our concerns about this reckless attitude towards Nintendo and Nintendo fans will persuade the Washington Post to issue a retraction.

Happy hunting. :)

:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol

When you wake up in the morning, do you try to figure out new and dramatic ways to look stupid?

TheGreenGiant said:
TheGreenGiant: well.. let see...

xbox is not on shelves
ps2 is not on shelves
(or hard to find)

GC is everywhere by the sounds of it. I think I hear the gears of the momentum train chugging into 2005.

No.
 
Oh god, this reminds me far too much of the pain Dreamcast fans had to endure...

Let go. Start saving up for either Xenon or PS3 and don't look back, it will make it a lot easier.

Nintendo has no mind share anymore, not even in Japan.
 
Washington Post is correct.

Aside from Nintendo-based titles there are really no new games coming for the GameCube exclusively being announced and really there probably isn't going to be any.

Even loyal supporters like Capcom are jumping off the ship.

I mean of course there's a controversial slant to it, but it reminds me of how riled up people got when Next Generation magazine ran a cover story with the title "What's Wrong With The Nintendo 64?" (with the cracked glass image of Mario).

Nintendo fans were up in arms about it, but really it was just Next Generation stating the obvious -- without CD-ROM support, the N64 would struggle to get a big enough library for the next four years.

Don't cry for Nintendo though, they're no where near like Sega. They're incredibly wealthy, will probably end up being successful with animated films, and are set to make almost a $1 billion dollar yearly profit next March even with the GCN struggling.

I hope Nintendo's next console is really, really out there. Even moreso than the DS. Like totally crazy and very different from any traditional console.
 
Top Bottom