True. With more and more games borrowing RPG conventions like levels and abilities, the RPG label is slapped on everything. CoD has levels, XP and character builds. RPG!
Sports games are the best RPGs.
True. With more and more games borrowing RPG conventions like levels and abilities, the RPG label is slapped on everything. CoD has levels, XP and character builds. RPG!
RPG is a truly meaningless term in video games these days, unless you're referring to rocket-propelled grenades. Everything is an RPG now.
Bloodborne probably fits far better in the Action/Adventure category.
Bloodborne should have at least won best RPG. Seriously does critics give a shit about gameplay today?
Sports games are the best RPGs.
My biggest issue is I don't really think the combat is fun. However I'm getting an alpha in a week or so and I intend to finish my play through. I want to make the combat more interesting though and my current build is very melee focused with quen spell in the mix.
I might find this all a tad more fun if I limit the sword play and try and bit of magic and alchamy out. Has that helped anyone here who found the melee a bit dull?
Maybe up igni and bombs or something? While keeping the dodge invincibility and maybe a couple of point in fast attack. I dunno. Any tips would be welcome.
I'm hoping I can make a build that makes combat fun so I am tempted to get the DLC and do more side quests or try NG+
What difficulty do you play on?
Bloodborne should have at least won best RPG. Seriously does critics give a shit about gameplay today?
Most critics don't have the patience for it, even if its their job. Only explanation
Bloodborne should have at least won best RPG. Seriously does critics give a shit about gameplay today?
Haha
I sent the W3 back to Boomerang rentals after 2 days because it wasn't for me, Combat was just clunky and annoying, And the map just seemed filled with icons to go too.
Each to there own i guess.
Well-deserved. And glad to see that the Bethesda bullshit doesn't seem to fly anymore.
I would have given it to bloodborne but I can see how witcher would win this... these awards arent exactly a symposium of industry intellectuals. Not that witcher 3 isn't worthy of praise.
If anything, it should have won "best action game".
But there was no "best action game" award and the action/adventure award went to MGS5. tough luck.
Bloodborne should've won Best Action and Best Art Direction at least.
Geralt's theme is god-tier music, bringing everything the franchise is together into one song. Incredible stuff.
If I'm honest I don't really remember much about the music from MGSV other than the licensed tracks(which I ended up using original music like Dragon Sound's Friends anyways). Sins of the Father and Nuclear were pretty great though. Alternatively, I loved Ori's soundtrack and fucking adored Witcher 3's Ambient Music and pretty much every other track as well. I put that soundtrack on as background music all the time at work.
Well-deserved. And glad to see that the Bethesda bullshit doesn't seem to fly anymore.
Mad max would like to have a word with you. My personal goty.Nothing came close to the Witcher 3 in 2015. Well deserved!
Mad max would like to have a word with you. My personal goty.
Hey! I like my games easy!Mad Max, AKA: Checklist The Game.
Lol, no.
For one thing, it is one of the least 'icons on a map'-ey open world game out there. There are icons, but A) most of them are meaningful (great places with great stories and characters and situations), B) they're all in unique, exciting places to explore, C) you can skip them very easily).
But more importantly, how long did you play for? And did you play the previous games? They dropped the ball badly with the opening couple of hours:
1. The combat is least balanced in the first few hours, so it feels clunkiest. As the hours roll by you get better and better gear and abilities which balance it out quickly and it starts getting more fun.
2. If you haven't played the previous games, I think they messed up introducing new players to the series. The opening hour is mainly junk about characters you won't care about.
Push through those aspects though? To hour 5-6-7? You will start having a great time. Then you'll have 100+ hours to go of sheer wonder.
This thread is evidence of what I'm saying here. (Aside from personal study of the game of course.)
Damn straight man. I appreciate Bethesda greatly but I think they've been playing the game wrong since Morrowind.
So The Witcher 3 isn't "intellectual"? Whatever that means?
The Bloodborne high horse is riding strong ITT.
Game of the decade so far
I agree using the word intellectuals is a bit odd because there isn't anything more intellectual about bloodborne. If anything w3 is prob more intellectual because of how story focused it is. However I don't like the bloodborne high horse comment either as that's the first high horse comment I have seen.
I also feel bloodborne was the best game this year and its pretty much my fav game ever now. But I get why this won. Both games target very different audiences and bloodborne is definitely more niche.
I would have giving BB best game and w3 best RPG because it is a lot more RPG than BB is. I think action / adventure is a bit to broad a category but I guess BB would fit that more. Mechanics wise MGSV could take best shooter for me.
Most of those posts are reasonable opinions. Preferring Bloodborne to The Witcher 3 isn't bad, nor is wanting your favorite game to win. I think TGA could have used some more categories tbh.
![]()
It's a solid 4.5/10.
shit sux
![]()
It was alright I guess.
![]()
Why does it matter what the mass market appeal is?
Most critics don't have the patience for it, even if its their job. Only explanation