bobbychalkers
Member
Power of a new Zelda game, people are going to talk about it. As disappointed I was when Nintendo announced their E3 plans, I ate every second of coverage up wide-eyed.
Crash Bandicoot at 7th, yet we still can't get a new game. The market is there, people.
It looks like it's the third most viewed trailer from E3 though which is impressive.I mean, the game had hours of gameplay presented. So it had more time for people to talk about. That means nothing.
Look at the hysterical hyperbole in these Zelda threads, people losing their shit over a game that looks and plays like it's from 2008, and tell me who is the one smoking.
I'm actually a little embarrassed for GAF for losing it's objectivity over this game. If it was being released by Ubisoft and called The Legend of Belda it would be written off as an outdated, mediocre looking action RPG.
I am by no means a Zelda hater and was looking forward to seeing what Nintendo had to offer, I am flabbergasted at the reaction from GAF. People urinating themselves over a companion locked behind an Amiibo like it is some kind of extreme revolution in gaming, and claiming the graphics are incredible because there are some ok looking explosion effects. I don't think I have ever seen anything like it, all the other big games announced at E3 have had fanboys and counter-fanboys and somewhere in between is the reality, but with Zelda it's full on kool aid psychosis.
I very much doubt the paying public will share this mentality unless the NX version is significantly, significantly better across the board.
It means the combat looks simplistic and basically unchanged bar weapon durability and a simplistic stealth system that should not be considered newsworthy and enemy AI that looked extremely dense. The open world looked sparse and the ways in which you interact with it, and the new crafting system, look like something that wouldn't have been revolutionary in a PS2 title let alone a marquis game in 2016.
I am not saying it looks like trash, I'm just saying it looks extremely mediocre.
But no, apparently the fact that you can beat it without engaging in the story is enough to cause fans to defecate themselves and worthy of it's own thread.
Look at the mounted combat in Horizon. Do you see people making their own threads proclaiming it the second coming of christ because you can fire an arrow from a mount? And yet with Zelda it becomes a game of the show worthy feature.
In all honesty it's laughable.
There are much more impressive games on display and Nintendo don't deserve so much praise for introducing derivative features that weren't cutting edge even years ago, or designing what appears to be an incredibly sparse open world that has been vastly surpassed by other devs. That's what I'm saying.
I'm not saying people shouldn't be happy and excited but claiming this is the game of E3 is an affront to the fact that many developers have already done what this game does, for years, and they are here at this E3 don't far more and not getting the same praise...
It's obviously not just a portion of this particular forum that is interested in the game, judging from the chart. What's so shocking about it?In a Nintendo official forum I wouldn't expect otherwise but from GAF?? I am genuinely shocked.
They will show their other games today, including mario party, paper mario, fire emblem, a new unannounced RPG for 3DS etc.However, I'm still a bit worried for Nintendo. I get that they've abandoned the Wii U, but where was Paper Mario? Nothing else in the pipeline at all?
Well, they demoed it online for like 6 hrs so that may have something to do with it.
Wait what.
Is that the stasis function used on the boulder to lock it in place and every time you hit it with the hammer the boulder gains stored energy which is released when you remove stasis?
Wait what.
Is that the stasis function used on the boulder to lock it in place and every time you hit it with the hammer the boulder gains stored energy which is released when you remove stasis?
Wait what.
Is that the stasis function used on the boulder to lock it in place and every time you hit it with the hammer the boulder gains stored energy which is released when you remove stasis?
Look at the hysterical hyperbole in these Zelda threads, people losing their shit over a game that looks and plays like it's from 2008, and tell me who is the one smoking.
I'm actually a little embarrassed for GAF for losing it's objectivity over this game. If it was being released by Ubisoft and called The Legend of Belda it would be written off as an outdated, mediocre looking action RPG.
I am by no means a Zelda hater and was looking forward to seeing what Nintendo had to offer, I am flabbergasted at the reaction from GAF. People urinating themselves over a companion locked behind an Amiibo like it is some kind of extreme revolution in gaming, and claiming the graphics are incredible because there are some ok looking explosion effects. I don't think I have ever seen anything like it, all the other big games announced at E3 have had fanboys and counter-fanboys and somewhere in between is the reality, but with Zelda it's full on kool aid psychosis.
I very much doubt the paying public will share this mentality unless the NX version is significantly, significantly better across the board.
It means the combat looks simplistic and basically unchanged bar weapon durability and a simplistic stealth system that should not be considered newsworthy and enemy AI that looked extremely dense. The open world looked sparse and the ways in which you interact with it, and the new crafting system, look like something that wouldn't have been revolutionary in a PS2 title let alone a marquis game in 2016.
I am not saying it looks like trash, I'm just saying it looks extremely mediocre.
But no, apparently the fact that you can beat it without engaging in the story is enough to cause fans to defecate themselves and worthy of it's own thread.
Look at the mounted combat in Horizon. Do you see people making their own threads proclaiming it the second coming of christ because you can fire an arrow from a mount? And yet with Zelda it becomes a game of the show worthy feature.
In all honesty it's laughable.
I am by no means a Zelda hater and was looking forward to seeing what Nintendo had to offer, I am flabbergasted at the reaction from GAF.
Wait what.
Is that the stasis function used on the boulder to lock it in place and every time you hit it with the hammer the boulder gains stored energy which is released when you remove stasis?
You should check out the other videos.Really? It looked really dull from the trailer. Just another open-world game only by Nintendo this time.
They will show their other games today, including mario party, paper mario, fire emblem, a new unannounced RPG for 3DS etc.
It starts in 2 hours
Wait what.
Is that the stasis function used on the boulder to lock it in place and every time you hit it with the hammer the boulder gains stored energy which is released when you remove stasis?
Well, what other games had a five hour-long stream all to themselves?
I wonder how this is measured, exactly.
Really? It looked really dull from the trailer. Just another open-world game only by Nintendo this time.
![]()
And the winner for most embarrassing poster of this year's E3 is..
Yesss thank you for this gif. I couldn't find it, so I was about to make it myself.
Wait what.
Is that the stasis function used on the boulder to lock it in place and every time you hit it with the hammer the boulder gains stored energy which is released when you remove stasis?
It is
That's exactly it, yep.
You got it.
Super derivative. I'm not sure from what but I'm 100% sure it is.
Maybe Skyrim. Probably Skyrim. Definitely Skyrim.
It means the combat looks simplistic and basically unchanged bar weapon durability and a simplistic stealth system that should not be considered newsworthy and enemy AI that looked extremely dense. The open world looked sparse and the ways in which you interact with it, and the new crafting system, look like something that wouldn't have been revolutionary in a PS2 title let alone a marquis game in 2016.
I am not saying it looks like trash, I'm just saying it looks extremely mediocre.
But no, apparently the fact that you can beat it without engaging in the story is enough to cause fans to defecate themselves and worthy of it's own thread.
Look at the mounted combat in Horizon. Do you see people making their own threads proclaiming it the second coming of christ because you can fire an arrow from a mount? And yet with Zelda it becomes a game of the show worthy feature.
In all honesty it's laughable.
Super derivative. I'm not sure from what but I'm 100% sure it is.
Maybe Skyrim. Probably Skyrim. Definitely Skyrim.
That's geordie "Splatoon isn't a real shooter because I can't feather my gun" mp, just ignore him
You don't have to like it, but terrible? Is there absolutely no gray area when it comes to evaluating games for you?
Anyone putting stock in the OPs chart will certainly believe Zelda will save the Wii U, right?
I must have missed the part in PS2 games where people set fire to grass and let the wind carry it to an enemy base. Or where we froze objects in time and built up their energy by striking them. Or used a magnet to move a sword through the air to damage enemies. Or rolled bombs downhill strategically to achieve goals or fish. Or seriously any of the unique shit we're seeing in gameplay footage so far.
Well, what other games had a five hour-long stream all to themselves?
I wonder how this is measured, exactly.
Super derivative. I'm not sure from what but I'm 100% sure it is.
Maybe Skyrim. Probably Skyrim. Definitely Skyrim.